Juggling Information Technology (IT) Exploration and Exploitation: A Proportional Balance View of IT Ambidexterity

References

• Aiken L, West S, Reno R (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4):696–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 6(1):3–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2015) Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award—“Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later. Acad. Management Rev. (40:4):497–514.Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Gupta K (2013) Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Acad. Management Perspectives 27(4):287–298.Google Scholar
• Bloomberg J (2015) Bimodal IT: Gartner’s recipe for disaster. Created September 26, 2015, www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2015/09/26/bimodal-it-gartners-recipe-for-disaster/#21aaab05dd75.Google Scholar
• Bozarth CC, Warsing DP, Flynn BB, Flynn EJ (2009) The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. J. Oper. Management 27(1):78–93.Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H (2009) Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ. Sci. 20(4):781–796.Link, Google Scholar
• Chakravarty A, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V (2013) Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):976–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen DQ, Mocker M, Preston DS, Teubner A (2010) Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quart. 34(2):233–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarksons (2013) Shipping market overview. Created October 29, 2013, http://www.clarksons.net/archive/research/freestuff/Moore%20Stephens%20Market%20Presentation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Psychology Press, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dess G, Beard D (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dove R (2001) Response Ability: The Language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Drasgow F, Schmitt N, eds. Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 350–400.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Parry ME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1577–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2018) Bimodal. Retrieved January 20, https://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/bimodal.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Rigdon EE, Straub D (2011) An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quart. 35(2):iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mähring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):57–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Kohli R, Ramanlal P (2018) Being mindful in digital initiatives. MIS Quart. Executive 17(3):5.Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Heinemann F, Brettel M, Hungeling S (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management J. 31(12):1337–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haffke I, Kalgovas B, Benlian A (2017) Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Quart. Executive 16(2):101–120.Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4):481–494.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Bastiansen E, Strandenes SP (2013) The international competitiveness of China’s shipbuilding industry. Transportation Res. Part E: Logistics Transportation Rev. 60(0):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kharabe A, Lyytinen KJ (2012) Is implementing ERP like pouring concrete into a company? Impact of enterprise systems on organizational agility. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Lee OK, Sambamurthy V, Lim KH, Wei KK (2015) How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):398–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang HG, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue YJ (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Wang N, Xue Y, Ge S (2017) Unraveling the alignment paradox: How does business–IT alignment shape organizational agility? Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):863–879.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Peng Z, Xue Y, Guo X, Wang N (2015) Employees’ exploration of complex systems: An integrative view. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(1):322–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Wang N, Xue Y, Ge S, Ransbotham S (2018) Can IT be too in sync with business strategy? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 59(3):1–5.Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Ramamurthy K (2011) Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quart. 35(4):931–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Markus ML (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Comm. ACM 26(6):430–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N, Ramirez R (2008) Information technology innovation diffusion: An information requirements paradigm. Inform. Systems J. 18(3):247–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montealegre R, Iyengar K, Sweeney J (2019) Understanding ambidexterity: Managing contradictory tensions between exploration and exploitation in the evolution of digital infrastructure. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(5):1.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. (41:1):223–238.Google Scholar
• Nazir S, Pinsonneault A (2012) IT and firm agility: An electronic integration perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(3):150–171.Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Wade M (2010) The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. 34(1):163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Nwankpa JK, Datta P (2017) Balancing exploration and exploitation of IT resources: The influence of digital business intensity on perceived organizational performance. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(5):469–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh W, Lucas HC (2006) Information technology and pricing decisions: Price adjustments in online computer markets. MIS Quart. 30(3):755–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overby E, Bharadwaj A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(2):120–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park Y, El Sawy OA, Fiss P (2017) The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: A configurational approach. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(9):648–686.Google Scholar
• Pelham AM (1999) Influence of environment, strategy, and market orientation on performance in small manufacturing firms. J. Bus. Res. 45(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prashant Kale HS (2007) Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management J. 28(10):981–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan A, Zu X, Grover V (2008) A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation. Omega 36(6):1105–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Lertwongsatien C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(4):237–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Grover V (2012) Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(4):231–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Chan YE (2001) Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Inform. Systems Res. 12(1):11–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Kwok-Kee W, Lim K, Lee D (2007) IT-Enabled Organizational Agility and Firms’ Sustainable Competitive Advantage ICIS 2007 Proc. 91, https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2007/91.Google Scholar
• Schmalensee RC (1985) Do markets differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (75:3):341–351.Google Scholar
• Sharp BM, Bergh DD, Li M (2013) Measuring and testing industry effects in strategic management research: An update, assessment, and demonstration. Organ. Res. Methods. 16(1):43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):273–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman ZR, Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S (2019) Performance consequences of information technology investments: Implications of emphasizing new or current information technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):204–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Subramani M (2004) How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. 28(1):45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR (2012) Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Management J. 55(2):314–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quart. 35(2):463–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Peteraf M, Leih S (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Rev. (58:4):13–35.Google Scholar
• Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T, Zahra SA (2009) Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management J. 30(2):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quart. 34(2):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I, Ward K (2013) The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: The case for IS adaptability. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(6):283–311.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li J (2008) Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. J. Manage. 34(5):925–951.Google Scholar
• Wang N, Xue Y, Liang H, Ge S (2011) The road to business-IT alignment: A case study of two Chinese companies. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 28(1):415–436.Google Scholar
• Wang N, Liang H, Zhong W, Xue Y, Xiao J (2012) Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study on business value of information technology. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):325–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Liang H, Boulton WR, Snyder CA (2005) ERP implementation failures in China: Case studies with implications for ERP vendors. Internat. J. Production Econom. 97(3):279–295.Crossref, Google Scholar