The Path to Hedonic Information System Use Addiction: A Process Model in the Context of Social Networking Sites

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1109

References

  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson M, Jiang J (2018) Teens, social media & technology. Accessed December 15, http://www.pewinternet.org//05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018.Google Scholar
  • Andreassen CS (2015) Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Rep. 2(2):175–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S (2012) Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psych. Rep. 110(2):501–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashby WR (1961) An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman & Hall, London).Google Scholar
  • Avgerou C (2013) Social mechanisms for causal explanation in social theory based IS research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(8):399–419.Google Scholar
  • Baler RD, Volkow ND (2006) Drug addiction: The neurobiology of disrupted self-control. Trends Molecular Medicine 12(12):559–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3):497–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beard KW (2005) Internet addiction: A review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsych. Behav. 8(1):7–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaption. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benaroch M, Lichtenstein Y, Robinson K (2006) Real options in information technology risk management: An empirical validation of risk-option relationships. MIS Quart. 30(4):827–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biglan A, Lichtenstein E (1984) A behavior‐analytic approach to smoking acquisition: Some recent findings. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 14(3):207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau MC, Gefen D, Straub DW (2001) Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. 25(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MNJN, Reviews B (2016) Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific internet-use disorders: An interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience Biobehav. Rev. 71:252-266.Google Scholar
  • Buckland MK (1991) Information and Information Systems (ABC-CLIO, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, Volkoff O (2017) How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):468–489.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, McLean ER, Monod E (2015) Theoretical perspectives in IS research: From variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(6):664–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills JE, Douglas AC, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Lee SK, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M (2009) Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996-2006 quantitative research. Cyberpsych. Behav. 12(2):203–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplan SE (2002) Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Comput. Human Behav. 18(5):553–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplan SE (2006) Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use. Cyberpsych. Behav. 10(2):234–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver CS (1979) A cybernetic model of self-attention processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8):1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (2001) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (2012) Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chak K, Leung L (2004) Shyness and locus of control as predictors of internet addiction and internet use. Cyberpsych. Behav. 7(5):559–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charlton JP, Danforth IDW (2010) Validating the distinction between computer addiction and engagement: Online game playing and personality. Behav. Inform. Tech. 29(6):601–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen A, Roberts N (2019) Connecting personality traits to social networking site addiction: The mediating role of motives. Inform. Tech. People 33(2):633–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Zhang KZ, Gong X, Zhao SJ, Lee MK, Liang L (2017) Examining the effects of motives and gender differences on smartphone addiction. Comput. Human Behav. 75(October):891–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi SB, Lim MS (2016) Effects of social and technology overload on psychological well-being in young South Korean adults: The mediatory role of social network service addiction. Comput. Human Behav. 61(August):245–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chou HL, Chou C (2019) A quantitative analysis of factors related to Taiwan teenagers’ smartphone addiction tendency using a random sample of parent-child dyads. Comput. Human Behav. 99(October):335–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chou TJ, Ting CC (2003) The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyberpsych. Behav. 6(6):663–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clement J (2019) Daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2018 (in minutes). Accessed May 30, https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/.Google Scholar
  • Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of Qualitative Research (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Coughlin SS (1990) Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J. Clinical Epidemiology 43(1):87–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis RA, Flett GL, Besser A (2002) Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsych. Behav. 5(4):331–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Jonge KM, Rietzschel EF, Van Yperen NW (2018) Stimulated by novelty? The role of psychological needs and perceived creativity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(6):851–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer R, Fraser S (2016) Addicting via hashtags: How is Twitter making addiction? Contemporary Drug Problems 43(1):79–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagle N, Pentland AS (2006) Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 10(4):255–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein S (1998) Cognitive-experiential self-theory. Barone DF, Hersen M, Van Hasselt VB, eds. Advanced Personality (Springer, Boston), 211–238.Google Scholar
  • Flores SE (2014) Facehooked: How Facebook Affects Our Emotions, Relationships, and Lives (Reputation Books).Google Scholar
  • Gerlach J, Cenfetelli RT (2020) Constant checking is not addiction: A grounded theory of it-mediated state-tracking. MIS Quart. 44(4):1705–1732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, classic ed. (Psychology Press, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
  • Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R (2011) Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):565–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman A (1990) Addiction: Definition and implications. Br. J. Addiction 85(11):1403–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green SG, Welsh MA (1988) Cybernetics and dependence: Reframing the control concept. Acad. Management Rev. 13(2):287–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths M, Kuss D (2017) Adolescent social media addiction (revisited). Ed. Health 35(3):49–52.Google Scholar
  • Grover A, Kamins MA, Martin IM, Davis S, Haws K, Mirabito AM, Mukherjee S, Pirouz D, Rapp J (2011) From use to abuse: When everyday consumption behaviours morph into addictive consumptive behaviours. J. Res. Consumers 19:1–6.Google Scholar
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart L (2018) Facebook: A case study in ethics. CMSWire (December 20), https://www.cmswire.com/digital-marketing/facebook-a-case-study-in-ethics/.Google Scholar
  • Hassouneh D, Brengman M (2014) A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users. Comput. Human Behav. 33(April):330–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hawi NS (2012) Internet addiction among adolescents in Lebanon. Comput. Human Behav. 28(3):1044–1053.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heylighen F, Joslyn C (2001) Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Meyers RA, ed. Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, New York), 155–170. Google Scholar
  • Hjørland B (1997) Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science (Greenwood, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
  • Jaccard J, Jacoby J (2019) Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists (Guilford publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • James TL, Lowry PB, Wallace L, Warkentin M (2017) The effect of belongingness on obsessive-compulsive disorder in the use of online social networks. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(2):560–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiow HJ, Lim SS (2012) The evolution of video game affordances and implications for parental mediation. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 32(6):455–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jung Y, Lyytinen K (2014) Toward an ecological account of media choice: A case study on pluralistic reasoning while choosing email. Inform. Systems J. 24(3):271–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA (2006) Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Karahanna E, Xu SX, Zhang N (2015) Psychological ownership motivation and use of social media. J. Marketing Theory Practice 23(2):185–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karahanna E, Xu SX, Xu Y, Zhang N (2018) The needs-affordances-features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42(3):737–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kayiş AR, Satici SA, Yilmaz MF, Şimşek D, Ceyhan E, Bakioğlu F (2016) Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Comput. Human Behav. 63(October):35–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King D, Delfabbro P, Griffiths M (2010) Video game structural characteristics: A new psychological taxonomy. Internat. J. Mental Health Addiction 8(1):90–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein HJ (1989) An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(2):150–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koob GF, Le Moal M (2008) Neurobiological mechanisms for opponent motivational processes in addiction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363(1507):3113–3123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krasnova H, Widjaja T, Buxmann P, Wenninger H, Benbasat I (2015) Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuss DJ, Griffiths M (2011) Online social networking and addiction—A review of the psychological literature. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 8(9):3528–3552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwon HE, So H, Han SP, Oh W (2016) Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: A rational addiction perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):919–939.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lalande DR, Ladouceur R (2011) Can cybernetics inspire gambling research? A limit-based conceptualization of self-control. Internat. Gambling Stud. 11(2):237–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Google Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A (2009) Studying processes in and around organizations. Buchanan D, Bryman A, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (SAGE, London), 409–429.Google Scholar
  • Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart. 29(3):461–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaRose R, Lin CA, Eastin MS (2003) Unregulated internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psych. 5(3):225–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson R (1993) Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1515–1546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quart. 37(3):749–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X (2012) Classification accuracy and cut point selection. Statist. Medicine 31(23):2676–2686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Gaskin J, Twyman N, Hammer B, Roberts T (2012) Taking “fun and games” seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(11):617–671.Google Scholar
  • Lysaught E, Wodarski JS (1996) Model: A dual focused intervention for depression and addiction. J. Child Adolescent Substance Abuse 5(1):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 19(1):38–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of it effects: A new look at Desanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(10):609–632.Google Scholar
  • Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Donovan DM, Kivlahan DR (1988) Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment. Annual Rev. Psych. 39(1):223–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall TC, Lefringhausen K, Ferenczi N (2015) The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality Individual Differences 85(October):35–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin K (2016) Understanding privacy online: Development of a social contract approach to privacy. J. Bus. Ethics 137(3):551–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin IM, Kamins MA, Pirouz DM, Davis SW, Haws KL, Mirabito AM, Mukherjee S, Rapp JM, Grover A (2013) On the road to addiction: The facilitative and preventive roles of marketing cues. J. Bus. Res. 66(8):1219–1226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehroof M, Griffiths M (2010) Online gaming addiction: The role of sensation seeking, self-control, neuroticism, aggression, state anxiety, and trait anxiety. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networking 13(3):313–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F (2013) Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: A literature review and analysis of affordances. J. Biomedical Informatics 46(6):957–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Moqbel M, Kock N (2018) Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction. Inform. Management 55(1):109–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P (2000) Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Comput. Human Behav. 16(1):13–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers MD (2013) Qualitative Research in Business and Management (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Nevo S, Wade MR (2010) The formation and value of it-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. 34(1):163–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niemz K, Griffiths M, Banyard P (2005) Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the general health questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsych. Behav. 8(6):562–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norušis MJ (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Statistical Procedures Companion (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ohlheiser A (2018) You want to quit Facebook, but will you really click the button? These folks tried. Washington Post (March 21), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/03/21/its-easy-to-hate-facebook-its-much-tougher-to-quit/?utm_term=.0c8eef40b263.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osatuyi B, Turel O (2020) Conceptualisation and validation of system use reduction as a self-regulatory IS use behaviour. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 29(1):44–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patton MQ (2014) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Paré G, Bourdeau S, Marsan J, Nach H, Shuraida S (2008) Re-examining the causal structure of information technology impact research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(4):403–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):711–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Rev. General Psych. 7(1):84–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL, Serrano C, Thatcher JB, Matthews K (2018) Understanding social networking site (SNS) identity from a dual systems perspective: An investigation of the dark side of SNS use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(5):600–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Potenza MN (2006) Should addictive disorders include non‐substance‐related conditions? Addiction 101(S1):142–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quiñones-García C, Korak-Kakabadse N (2014) Compulsive internet use in adults: A study of prevalence and drivers within the current economic climate in the UK. Comput. Human Behav. 30:171–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rachlin H (1990) Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses? Psych. Sci. 1(5):294–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rappaport RA (1971) Ritual, sanctity, and cybernetics 1. Amer. Anthropologist 73(1):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivard S, Lapointe L (2010) A cybernetic theory of the impact of implementers' actions on user resistance to information technology implementation. Proc. 43rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. Kauai, HI, 1–10.Google Scholar
  • Romm CT, Pliskin N (1999) The office tyrant-social control through email. Inform. Tech. People 12(1):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoenebeck SY (2014) Giving up Twitter for Lent: How and why we take breaks from social media. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems Toronto 773–782.Google Scholar
  • Seah M, Cairns P (2008) From immersion to addiction in videogames. People Comput. XXII Culture, Creativity, Interaction (British Computer Society, London), 55–63.Google Scholar
  • Serenko A, Turel O (2020) Directing technology addiction research in information systems: Part i. Understanding behavioral addictions. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 51(3):81–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soliman W, Rinta-Kahila T (2019) Toward a refined conceptualization of IS discontinuance: Reflection on the past and a way forward. Inform. Management 57(2):103167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soror AA, Hammer BI, Steelman ZR, Davis FD, Limayem MM (2015) Good habits gone bad: Explaining negative consequences associated with the use of mobile phones from a dual‐systems perspective. Inform. Systems J. 25(4):403–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spangler T (2018) Hooked on hardware? Tech giants face tough questions over device addiction. Variety (March 13), http://variety.com/2018/digital/features/smartphone-addiction-apps-apple-facebook-google-1202724489/.Google Scholar
  • Stein MK, Newell S, Wagner EL, Galliers RD (2015) Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation and non-conforming use patterns. MIS Quart. 39(2):367–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone-Romero EF (2009) Implications of research design options for the validity of inferences derived from organizational research. Buchanan D, Bryman A, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (SAGE, London), 302–327.Google Scholar
  • Strong DM, Johnson SA, Tulu B, Trudel J, Volkoff O, Pelletier LR, Bar-On I, Garber L (2014) A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(2):53–85.Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R (2010) Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):346–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, D’Arcy J, Turel O, Gupta A (2015) The dark side of information technology. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 56(2):61–70.Google Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2020) Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Inform. Systems J. 30(1):96–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas DM, Bostrom RP (2010) Vital signs for virtual teams: An empirically developed trigger model for technology adaptation interventions. MIS Quart. 34(1):115–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toates FM (1981) Homeostasis, regulation and control. Systems Behavior, 208-213.Google Scholar
  • Treem J, Leonardi PM (2012) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 36(1):143–189.Google Scholar
  • Turel O (2015) Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: A theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(4):431–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Qahri-Saremi H (2016) Problematic use of social networking sites: Antecedents and consequence from a dual-system theory perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1087–1116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Serenko A (2010) Is mobile email addiction overlooked? Comm. ACM 53(5):41–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Serenko A (2012) The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(5):512–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Qahri-Saremi H, Vaghefi I (2021) Dark sides of digitalization. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 25(2):127–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Serenko A, Giles P (2011) Integrating technology addiction and adoption: An empirical investigation of online auction websites. MIS Quart. 35(4):1043–1061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, Negoita B (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quart. 41(4):1179–1205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaghefi I, Lapointe L, Boudreau-Pinsonneault C (2017) A typology of user liability to it addiction. Inform. Systems J. 27(2):125–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaghefi I, Qahri-Saremi H, Turel O (2020) Dealing with social networking site addiction: A cognitive-affective model of discontinuance decisions. Internet Res. 30(5):1427–1453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Den Eijnden RJ, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM (2016) The social media disorder scale. Comput. Human Behav. 61(August):478–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. 28(4):695–704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Rooij AJ, Ferguson CJ, Van de Mheen D, Schoenmakers TM (2017) Time to abandon internet addiction? Predicting problematic internet, game, and social media use from psychosocial well-being and application use. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 14(1):113–121.Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Sykes T, Chan FK, Thong JY, Hu PJ (2019) Children’s internet addiction, family-to-work conflict, and job outcomes: A study of parent-child dyads. MIS Quart. 43(3):903–927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman SMK, Cheung C, Lee ZWD, Davis F, Venkatesh V (2018) The “Darth” side of technology use: An inductively derived typology of cyberdeviance. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1060–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quart. 37(3):819–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volkoff O, Strong DM (2017) Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. Galliers RD, Stein M-K, eds. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge, London), 232–245.Google Scholar
  • von Eye A, Mun EY (2005) Analyzing Rater Agreement: Manifest Variable Methods (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Lee MK (2020) Why we cannot resist our smartphones: Investigating compulsive use of mobile SNS from a stimulus-response-reinforcement perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(1):175–200.Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Lee MK, Hua Z (2015) A theory of social media dependence: Evidence from microblog users. Decision Support Systems 69(January):40–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics. Sci. Amer. 179(5):14–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wigley S (2007) Automaticity, consciousness and moral responsibility. Philos. Psych. 20(2):209–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu J, Du H (2012) Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(6):680–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Tan BC (2012) Why do I keep checking Facebook: Effects of message characteristics on the formation of social network services addiction. Proc. 32th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  • Xu Z, Turel O, Yuan Y (2012) Online game addiction among adolescents: Motivation and prevention factors. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(3):321–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang SC, Tung CJ (2007) Comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Comput. Human Behav. 23(1):79–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S, Liu Y, Wei J (2016) Social capital on mobile SNS addiction. Internet Res. 26(4):982–1000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young KS (1998) Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsych. Behav. 1(3):237–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young KS, Rogers RC (1998) The relationship between depression and internet addiction. Cyberpsych. Behav. 1(1):25–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang KZ, Chen C, Lee MK (2014) Understanding the role of motives in smartphone addiction. Proc. 18th Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems, Chengdu, China, 131.Google Scholar
  • Zhu J, Zhang W, Yu C, Bao Z (2015) Early adolescent internet game addiction in context: How parents, school, and peers impact youth. Comput. Human Behav. 50(September):159–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.