How Network Embeddedness Affects Real-Time Performance Feedback: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Abramis D (1994) Work role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and job performance: Meta-analyses and review. Psych. Rep. 75:1411–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Addady M (2015) GE replaces annual performance reviews with an app. Fortune (August 13), accessed January 5, 2022, http://fortune.com/2015/08/13/performance-reviews/.Google Scholar
• Ali-Hassan H, Nevo D, Wade M (2015) Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(2):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amjad T, Ding Y, Xu J, Zhang C, Daud A, Tang J, Song M (2017) Standing on the shoulders of giants. J. Informetrics 11(1):307–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337:337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Brett JF (2006) 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group Organ. Management 31(5):578–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Benner MJ, Qiu L (2019) Nurturing online communities: An empirical investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(2):425–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Qiu L, Rice S (2017) Repeated interactions vs. social ties: Quantifying the economic value of trust, forgiveness, and reputation using a field experiment. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(3):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Bastos MW, Fletcher C (1995) Exploring the individual’s perception of sources and credibility of feedback in the work environment. Internat. J. Selected Assessment 3(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bear JB, Cushenbery L, London M, Sherman GD (2017) Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership. Leadership Quart. 28(6):721–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker T, Klimoski R (2006) A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance. Personality Psych. 42:343–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Anchor Books).Google Scholar
• Bol JC (2011) The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1549–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (2007) Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Soc. Networks 29:555–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks 27(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):518–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckingham M, Goodall A (2015) Reinventing performance management. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://hbr.org/2015/04/reinventing-performance-management.Google Scholar
• Buckingham M, Goodall A (2019) The feedback fallacy. Harvard Business Review. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://hbr.org/2019/03/the-feedback-fallacy.Google Scholar
• Burkhardt ME (1994) Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Acad. Management J. 37(4):869–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1997) A note on social capital and network content. Soc. Networks 19(4):355–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Sevilir M (2012) Board connections and M&A transactions. J. Financial Econom. 103(2):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calder B (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. Staw B, Salancik G, eds. New Directions in Organizational Behavior, (St. Clair Press, Chicago), 179–204.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Conyon MJ (2018) What do performance appraisals do? Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 71(1):88–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Tavis A (2016) The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution?referral=03759&cm_vc=rr_item_page.bottom.Google Scholar
• Cardy RL, Dobbins GH (1994) Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives (South-Western Publishing Company, Cincinnati, OH).Google Scholar
• Charles KK, Guryan J (2008) Prejudice and wages: An empirical assessment of Becker’s The Economics of Discrimination. J. Political Econom. 116(5):773–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2012) Regression Analysis by Example, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li S (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Williams O (2020) Individual performance management in the COVID-19 world. McKinsey (December 3). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-organization-blog/individual-performance-management-in-the-covid-19-world.Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357(4):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008) The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England J. Medicine 358(21):2249–2258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn MA, Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW (2004) Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psych. Sci. 15:68793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeNisi AS, Murphy KR (2017) Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dilenschneider C (2018) Which social media platforms are most important for organizations. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.colleendilen.com/2018/10/24/social-media-platforms-important-organizations-data-update/.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Zukin S (1990) Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Gangl M (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol. Methodology 34:271–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doreian P (1989) Network autocorrelation models: Problems and prospects. Griffith DA, ed. Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, Future (Michigan Document Services, Ann Arbor, MI), 369–389.Google Scholar
• Economy P (2019) The (millennial) workplace of the future is almost here. Inc (January 15). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.inc.com/peter-economy/the-millennial-workplace-of-future-is-almost-here-these-3-things-are-about-to-change-big-time.html.Google Scholar
• Elejalde-Ruiz A (2016) Companies are scrapping annual performance reviews for real-time feedback. Chicago Tribune (April 22). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-performance-reviews-overhaul-0424-biz-20160421-story.html.Google Scholar
• Engelberg J, Gao P, Parsons CA (2012) Friends with money. J. Financial Econom. 103(1):169–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewenstein B, Hancock B, Komm A (2016) Ahead of the curve: The future of performance management. McKinsey Quart. 2:64–73.Google Scholar
• Feng H, Jiang Z, Li M, Feng N (2020) First- or second-mover advantage? The case of IT-enabled platform markets. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1107–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. BMJ 338(7685):23–31.Google Scholar
• Franceschet M, Costantini A (2010) The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. J. Informetrics 4(4):540–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freifeld L (2017) Tech talk. Training Mag. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://trainingmag.com/tech-talk-march-april-2017/.Google Scholar
• Gaujoux R, Seoighe C (2020) NMF: Algorithms and framework for nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NMF/vignettes/NMF-vignette.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Pavlou P (2012) The boundaries of trust and risk: The quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):940–959.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Sundararajan A (2006) The dimensions of reputation in electronic markets. Preprint, submitted March 20, 2009, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.885568.Google Scholar
• Gibbons DE (2004) Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):238–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodwin B (2016) Mobile apps could put an end to ‘hated’ staff appraisals. Computer Weekly (February 16). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.computerweekly.com/news/4500272768/Mobile-apps-could-put-an-end-to-hated-staff-appraisals.Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood B, Adjerid I, Angst CM (2022) How unbecoming of you: Online experiments uncovering gender biases in perceptions of ridesharing performance. J. Bus. Ethics. 175:499–518.Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Lilien GL, Mallapragada G (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Liao J, Liao S, Zhang Y (2014) The mediating role of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between developmental feedback and employee job performance. Soc. Behav. Personality 42:731–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hao L, Guo H, Easley RF (2017) A mobile platform’s in-app advertising contract under agency pricing for app sales. Production Oper. Management 26(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harber KD, Stafford R, Kennedy KA (2010) The positive feedback bias as a response to self-image threat. British J. Soc. Psych. 49(1):207–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Saad N, Rousalova I, Sreter K (2017) How to give and receive feedback effectively. Breathe (Sheffield) 13(4):327–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Steelman ZR, Sabherwal S (2019) Relationships between information technology and other investments: A contingent interaction model. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):291–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Heinrich C, Maffioli A, Vázquez G (2010) A primer for applying propensity-score matching (Technical notes No. IDB-TN-161). Inter-American Development Bank. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://publications.iadb.org/en/primer-applying-propensity-score-matching.Google Scholar
• Hoff P, Fosdick B, Volfovsky A, Stovel K (2012) Likelihoods for fixed rank nomination networks. Network Sci. 1(3):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman B, Lance C, Bynum B, Gentry W (2010) Rater source effects are alive and well after all. Personality Psych. 63:119–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1951) The Human Group (Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA, Wang K, Shi N (2017) On the role of fairness and social distance in designing effective social referral systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(3):787–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsia L-H, Huang I, Hwang G-J (2016) Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students’ performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Comput. Edu. 96:55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsueh J-T, Lin N-P, Li H-C (2010) The effects of network embeddedness on service innovation performance. Service Industry J. 30(10):1723–1736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Hong Y, Burtch G (2017) Social network integration and user content generation: Evidence from natural experiments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Andrews SB (1993) Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Barnes-Farrell JL, McKellin DB (1993) Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 54(3):321–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishii J, Xuan Y (2014) Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. J. Financial Econom. 112(3):344–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Mookerjee VS, Sarkar S (2005) Lying on the web: Implications for expert systems redesign. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):131–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Jung JH, Schneider C, Valacich J (2010) Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Sci. 56(4):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacewicz E, Pennebaker JW, Davis M, Jeon M, Graesser AC (2014) Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. J. Language Soc. Psych. 33:125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly L (2018) 4 reasons your organization needs a strong social media presence. Boxcast (February 26). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.boxcast.com/blog/4-reasons-your-organization-needs-a-strong-social-media-presence.Google Scholar
• Khoros (2021) The 2021 social media demographics guide. Accessed January 5, 2022, https://khoros.com/resources/social-media-demographics-guide.Google Scholar
• Khurana S, Qiu L, Kumar S (2019) When a doctor knows, it shows: An empirical analysis of doctors’ responses in a Q&A forum of an online healthcare portal. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):872–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (1990) The interpersonal structure of decision making: A social comparison approach to organizational choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(2):270–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kluegel J (1978) The causes and cost of racial exclusion from job authority. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43(3):285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Kilduff M (1990) Friendship patterns and culture: The control of organizational diversity. Amer. Anthropology 92(1):142–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Stern RN (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Qiu L (2022) Social Media Analytics and Practical Applications: The Change to the Competition Landscape (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Qiu L, Kumar S (2018a) Exit, voice, and response on digital platforms: An empirical investigation of online management response strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):849–870.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Qiu L, Kumar S (2022) A hashtag is worth a thousand words: An empirical investigation of social media strategies in trademarking hashtags. Inform. Systems Res., Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Venugopal D, Qiu L, Kumar S (2018b) Detecting review manipulation on online platforms with hierarchical supervised learning. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):350–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Venugopal D, Qiu L, Kumar S (2019) Detecting anomalous online reviewers: An unsupervised approach using mixture models. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(4):1313–1346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Neter J, Li W (2005) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, So EC, Wang CCY (2013) Boardroom centrality and firm performance. J. Accounting Econom. 55(2):225–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (1989) The dynamic interplay between employees’ feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors’ delivery of performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):408–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR (1989) Self-presentational processes in leadership emergence and effectiveness. Giacalone RA, Rosenfeld P, eds. Impression Management in the Organization (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 363–375.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Seung H (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401:788–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GM, Qiu L, Whinston AB (2016) A friend like me: Modeling network formation in a location-based social network. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1008–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leenders R (2002) Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Soc. Networks 24(1):21–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefroy J, Roberts N, Molyneux A, Bartlett M, Gay S, McKinley R (2017) Utility of an app-based system to improve feedback following workplace-based assessment. Internat. J. Medical Edu. 8:207–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X (2016) Could deal promotion improve merchants’ online reputations? The moderating role of prior reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• London M (1997) Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Maher KJ (1991) Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance, vol. 1 (Unwin Hyman, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ma H, Yang H, Lyu M, King I (2008) SoRec: Social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. Shanahan J, Amer-Yahia S, Manolescu I, Zhang Y, Evans D, Kolcz A, Choi K, et al., eds. Proc. 17th ACM Conf. on Inform. and Knowledge Management (ACM Press, New York), 931–940.Google Scholar
• Maas VS, Torres-González R (2011) Subjective performance evaluation and gender discrimination. J. Bus. Ethics 101(4):667–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McArthur L, Baron R (1983) Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psych. Rev. 90:215–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dixon AL, Brass DJ, Robertson B (2006) The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ. Sci. 17(1):64–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Meindl JR, Ehrlich S, Dukerich JM (1985) The romance of leadership. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30:78–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M, Galaskiewicz J (1993) Networks of interorganizational relations. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1):46–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS, Potts BB (1998) Centrality and power revisited: Actor success in group decision making. Soc. Networks 20(4):353–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2002) Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicol DJ, Macfarlane‐Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. Higher Edu. 31(2):199–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Networks 32:245–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Qiu L (2022) How ride‐sharing is shaping public transit system: A counterfactual estimator approach. Production Oper. Management, Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor J-C, Meindl JR, Mayo M (2002) A network effects model of charisma attributions. Acad. Management J. 45:410–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K (2015) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 (University of Texas at Austin, Austin).Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Frazee J, Lavergne GM, Beaver DI (2014) When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS One 9:110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrucci T, Rivera M, Tironi C (2016) DevelapMe (Version 2.1) [Software]. Accessed January 5, 2022, http://www.develapme.com.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1977) The ambiguity of leadership. Acad. Management Rev. 2:104–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccinin SJ (2003) Feedback: Key to Learning (Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Halifax).Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Farh J-L (1989) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Ahuja G, Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Huang K, Milward HB (2009) The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 19(4):873–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pu J, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2020) Does identity disclosure help or hurt user content generation? Social presence, inhibition, and displacement effects. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):297–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Pu J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2022) What questions are you inclined to answer? Effects of hierarchy in corporate Q&A communities. Inform. Systems Res., Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Kumar S (2017) Understanding voluntary knowledge provision and content contribution through a social-media-based prediction market: A field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Cheng HK, Pu J (2017) Hidden profiles in corporate prediction markets: The impact of public information precision and social interactions. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1249–1273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Rui H, Whinston A (2013) Social network-embedded prediction markets: The effects of information acquisition and communication on predictions. Decision Support Systems 55(4):978–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Rui H, Whinston AB (2014a) Effects of social networks on prediction markets: Examination in a controlled experiment. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(4):235–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Rui H, Whinston AB (2014b) The impact of social network structures on prediction market accuracy in the presence of insider information. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):145–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Shi Z, Whinston AB (2018) Learning from your friends’ check-ins: An empirical study of location-based social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):1044–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravindran K, Susarla A, Mani D, Gurbaxani V (2015) Social capital and contract duration in buyer-supplier networks for information technology outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):379–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivera M, Qiu L, Kumar S, Petrucci T (2021) Are traditional performance reviews outdated?: An empirical analysis on continuous real-time mobile feedback in the workplace. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):517–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Romo F, Schwartz M (1995) The structural embeddedness of business decisions: The migration of manufacturing plants in New York state, 1960 to 1985. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 60(6):874–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (1995) Observational Studies, 1st ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roslansky R (2021) You need a skills-based approach to hiring and developing talent. Harvard Business Review (June 8). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://hbr.org/2021/06/you-need-a-skills-based-approach-to-hiring-and-developing-talent.Google Scholar
• Saal F, Downey R, Lahey M (1980) Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psych. Bull. 88:413–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos C (2017) Real time performance feedback? They have an app for that. Chief Learning Officer (February 9). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2017/02/09/real-time-performance-feedback-app/.Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw ME (1964) Communication networks. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 1:111–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Whinston A (2013) Network structure and observational learning: Evidence from a location-based social network. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(2):185–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi C, Hu P, Fan W, Qiu L (2021) How learning effects influence knowledge contribution in online Q&A community? A social cognitive perspective. Decision Support Systems 149:113610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Thornton GC (1986) Effects of gender on self- and supervisory ratings. Acad. Management J. 29(1):115–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman RE (2016) GE re-engineers performance reviews, pay practices. Wall Street Journal (June 8). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.wsj.com/articles/ge-re-engineers-performance-reviews-pay-practices-1465358463.Google Scholar
• Silverman D, Silverman JH (1971) Theory of Organisations (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Sahoo N, Mukhopadhyay T (2014) How to attract and retain readers in enterprise blogging? Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):35–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2011) Network effects: The influence of structural capital on open source project success. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):813–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith BYA, Anderson M (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Centre (March 1), http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.Google Scholar
• Spaeth JL (1985) Job power and earnings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50(5):603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman L, Rutkowski K (2004) Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. J. Management Psych. 19:6–18.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):668–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Shi L, Viswanathan S, Zheleva E (2019) Motivating effective mobile app adoptions: Evidence from a large-scale randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):523–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Susarla A (2012) Contractual flexibility, rent seeking and renegotiation design: An empirical analysis of information technology outsourcing contracts. Management Sci. 58(7):1388–1407.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Mookerjee V, Singh P (2007) Social capital, structural holes and team composition: Collaborative networks of the open source software community. ICIS 2007 Proc. (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 155.Google Scholar
• Tankovska H (2021) Number of social network users worldwide from 2017 to 2025. Statistia (January 28). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/.Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Language Soc. Psych. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1983) Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision making: A sociometric analysis. Management Sci. 29(1):12–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Twenge J (2017) iGen (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente TW, Coronges K, Lakon C, Costenbader E (2008) How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections 28(1):16–28.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Du R, Shen W, Qiu L, Fan W (2022) Product reviews: A benefit, a burden, or a trifle? How seller reputation affects the role of product reviews. Management Inform. Systems Quart., Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu L (2013) Social network effects on productivity and job security: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):30–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang HJ, Wang G (2016) Understanding crowdfunding processes: A dynamic evaluation and simulation approach. J. Electron. Commerce Res. 17(1):47.Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Dresner M, Palmer JW (2009) Impact of boundary‐spanning information technology and position in chain on firm performance. J. Supply Chain Management 45(4):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye S, Gao G, Viswanathan S (2014) Strategic behavior in online reputation systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):1033–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yohn DL (2019) Employee feedback is good for employee engagement; Action is better. Forbes (August 6). Accessed January 5, 2022, https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2019/08/06/employee-feedback-is-good-for-employee-engagement-action-is-better.Google Scholar
• Yue X, Liu J (2006) Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174(1):646–667.Crossref, Google Scholar