Analyzing the Impact of Public Buyer–Seller Engagement During Online Auctions

References

• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews T, Benzing C (2007) The determinants of price in internet auctions of used cars. Atlantic Econom. J. 35:43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Simonson I (2003) Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):113–123.Google Scholar
• Ba S, Pavlou PA (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly. 26(3):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2003) The winner’s curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):329–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Dellarocas C, Zervas G (2021) Interacting user-generated content technologies: How questions and answers affect consumer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 58(4):742–761.Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Muylle S (2003) Authentication in e-commerce. Comm. ACM 46(12):159–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A (2019) Markets for information: An introduction. Annual Rev. Econom. 11:85–107.Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Bond S (2002) Dynamic panel data models: A guide to microdata methods and practice. Working Paper CWP09/02, Cemmap, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y (2014) What happens when word of mouth goes mobile? Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, 1–18. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2519931.Google Scholar
• Butler JK (1995) Behaviors, trust, and goal achievement in a win-win negotiating role play. Group Organ. Management 20(4):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Hortaçsu A (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from eBay. J. Indust. Econom. 58(1):54–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter M, Tams S, Grover V (2017) When do I profit? Uncovering boundary conditions on reputation effects in online auctions. Inform. Management 54(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JAJ, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood C (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quart. 36(2):395–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ducarroz C, Yang S, Greenleaf EA (2016) Understanding the impact of in-process promotional messages: An application to online auctions. J. Marketing 80(2):80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Escalas JE (2007) Self‐referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. J. Consumer Res. 33(4):421–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrin DL, Dirks KT, Shah PP (2006) Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4):870–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton JJ, Golden J (2018) Reputation inflation. Preprint, submitted March 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136473.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Franco Valdez AD, Valdez Cervantes A, Motyka S (2018) Beauty is truth: The effects of inflated product claims and website interactivity on evaluations of retailers’ websites. J. Bus. Res. 90:67–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D (2004) Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32(6):407–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27(1):51–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghasemkhani H, Goes PB, Tripathi AK (2021) Effect of market information on bidder attrition in online auction markets. Preprint, submitted June 15, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866286.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Karuga GG, Tripathi AK (2010) Understanding willingness-to-pay formation of repeat bidders in sequential online auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):907–924.Link, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Karuga GG, Tripathi AK (2012) Bidding behavior evolution in sequential auctions: Characterization and analysis. MIS Quart. 36(4):1021–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Pathak B, Tripathi AK, Ying F (2006) From Fatwallet to eBay: An investigation of online deal-forums and sales promotions. J. Retailing 82(2):155–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Ye Q (2014) First step in social media—Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production Oper. Management 23(4):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Yadav MS, Varadarajan R (2009) How task-facilitative interactive tools foster buyers’ trust in online retailers: A process view of trust development in the electronic marketplace. J. Retailing 85(2):159–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4):1029–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ (2005) Competition and disclosure incentives: An empirical study of HMOs. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):93–112.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempf DS, Smith RE (1998) Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):325–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Ghasemkhani H, Dandan Q, Kannan K (2022) The impact of online Q&As on product sales: The case of Amazon answer. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2794149.Google Scholar
• Konovsky MA, Pugh SD (1994) Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Acad. Management J. 37(3):656–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2002) Para-social presence and communication capabilities of a web site: A theoretical perspective. e-Service J. 1(3):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Qiu L, Kumar S (2018) Exit, voice, and response on digital platforms: An empirical investigation of online management response strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):849–870.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis G (2011) Asymmetric information, adverse selection and online disclosure: The case of eBay motors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1535–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Bridger D (2001) The Soul of the New Consumer (Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Li Y, Srinivasan A, Tripathi A (2017) Exploring information disclosure in online auctions. Proc. Mediterranean Conf. Inform. Systems. AIS eLibrary, https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2017/43.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tripathi A, Srinivasan A (2016) Challenges in short text classification: The case of online auction disclosure. Proc. Mediterranean Conf. Inform. Systems. AIS eLibrary, https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2016/18.Google Scholar
• Liu C, Arnett KP (2000) Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Inform. Management 38(1):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):534–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masclet D, Pénard T (2012) Do reputation feedback systems really improve trust among anonymous traders? An experimental study. Appl. Econom. 44(35):4553–4573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mickey R (2010) The impact of a seller’s eBay reputation on price. Amer. Econom. 55(2):162–169.Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Tucker C (2013) Active social media management: The case of health care. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Moreno A, Terwiesch C (2014) Doing business with strangers: Reputation in online service marketplaces. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):865–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing 58(3):20–38.Google Scholar
• Muthitachareon A, Barut M, Saeed KA (2014) The role of uncertainty stemming from product monetary value in online auctions: The case of search goods. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 19(1):65–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell SJ (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou Pa, Dimoka A (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):392–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Ou CX, Pavlou PA, Davison RM (2014) Swift guanxi in online marketplaces. MIS Quart. 38(1):209–230.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principle–agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Comput. Human Behav. 20(2):201–223.Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG (1981) Negotiation Behavior, 1st ed. (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rafaeli S, Noy A (2005) Social presence: Influence on bidders in internet auctions. Electronic Markets 15(2):158–175.Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K (2006) The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experment. Econom. 9:79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009) How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 9(1):86–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sage A (1981) Behavioral and organizational considerations in the design of information systems and processes for planning and decision support. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 11(9):640–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2005) Posting versus lurking: Communication in a multiple audience context. J. Consumer Res. 32(2):260–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurr PH, Ozanne JL (1985) Influences on exchange processes: Buyers’ preconceptions of a seller’s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. J. Consumer Res. 11(4):939–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shahbaznezhad H, Tripathi AK (2015) Customer and firm interactions on social media. Proc. Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems. (AIS eLibrary, https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Shen KN, Khalifa M (2008) Exploring multidimensional conceptualization of social presence in the context of online communities. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction. 24(7):722–748.Google Scholar
• Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (John Wiley & Sons, London).Google Scholar
• Sumer HC, Knight PA (1996) Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: Effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. J. Appl. Psych. 81(4):436–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas JB, Peters CO, Howell EG, Robbins K (2012) Social media and negative word of mouth: Strategies for handing unexpecting comments. Atlantic Marketing J. 1(2):87–108.Google Scholar
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2012) Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Sci. 31(2):198–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Tu CH (2000) On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. J. Network Computer Appl. 23(1):27–37.Google Scholar
• Wolf JR, Muhanna WA (2005) Adverse selection and reputation systems in online auctions: Evidence from eBay motors. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems), 847–858. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=icis2005.Google Scholar
• Wolf JR, Muhanna WA (2011) Feedback mechanisms, judgment bias, and trust formation in online auctions. Decision Sci. 42(1):43–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wongkitrungrueng A, Assarut N (2020) The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J. Bus. Res. 117(3):543–556.Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R, Adams C (2010) The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci. 29(6):964–987.Link, Google Scholar