The Impact of Social Reputation Features in Innovation Tournaments: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

References

• Acar OA (2018) Harnessing the creative potential of consumers: Money, participation, and creativity in idea crowdsourcing. Marketing Lett. 29(2):177–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archak N (2010) Money, glory and cheap talk: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web, (Association of Computing Machinery), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772694.Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Twenge JM (2003) The social self. Millon T, Lerner MJ, eds. Personality and Social Psychology. Handbook of Psychology (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL (2013) Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Sci. 59(1):226–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL (2003) Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. 88(6):989–1004.Google Scholar
• Berger L, Klassen KJ, Libby T, Webb A (2013) Complacency and giving up across repeated tournaments: Evidence from the field. J. Management Accounting Res. 25(1):143–167.Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2015) Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture. J. Oper. Management 36:187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosu A, Corley CS, Heaton D, Chatterji D, Carver JC, Kraft NA (2013). Building reputation in StackOverflow: An empirical investigation. Proc. IEEE Internat. Working Conf. on Mining Software Repositories, 89–92.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank-order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Zhu D (2016) Reputation in an open source software community: Antecedents and impacts. Decision Support Systems 91:103–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Jin GZ, Liu C, Zhou LA (2014) Seller reputation: From word-of-mouth to centralized feedback. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 34(1):51–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camacho N, Nam H, Kannan PK, Stremersch S (2019) Tournaments to crowdsource innovation: The role of moderator feedback and participation intensity. J. Marketing 83(2):138–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Came S (2018) 2016 update to the TripAdvisor Popularity Index algorithm Q&A by Sarah Came on Hotel Tech Report. Retrieved April 26, 2020, https://hoteltechreport.com/news/2016-update-to-the-tripadvisor-popularity-index-algorithm-qa.Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu H, Phan TQ, Cavusoglu H, Airoldi EM (2016) Assessing the impact of granular privacy controls on content sharing and disclosure on Facebook. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):848–879.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wei X, Zhu K (2017) Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden Markov model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):83–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2012) GE’s ecomagination challenge: An experiment in open innovation. California Management Rev. 54(3):140–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Roth Y, Lemoine JF (2015) The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):189–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford J, Jussim L, Pilanski J (2014) How (not) to interpret and report main effects and interactions in multiple regression: Why Crawford and Pilanski did not actually replicate Lindner and Nosek (2009). Political Psych. 35:(6):857–862.Google Scholar
• de Beer J, McCarthy IP, Soliman A, Treen E (2017) Click here to agree: Managing intellectual property when crowdsourcing solutions. Bus. Horizons 60(2):207–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deodhar SJ, Babar Y, Burtch G (2019) Falling from digital grace: Participation in online software contests following loss of status. Proc. 52nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (University of Hawaii at Manoa). https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/59883.Google Scholar
• Dickerson SS, Gruenewald TL, Kemeny ME (2004) When the social self is threatened: Shame, physiology, and health. J. Personality 72(6):1191–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dissanayake I, Zhang J, Gu B (2015) Task division for team success in crowdsourcing contests: Resource allocation and alignment effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(2):8–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dissanayake I, Zhang J, Yasar M, Nerur SP (2018) Strategic effort allocation in online innovation tournaments. Inform. Management 55(3):396–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Huang L, Hou J, Liu Y (2020) Continuous content contribution in virtual community: The role of status-standing on motivational mechanisms. Decision Support Systems 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Neufeld D (2009) Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. J. Management Inform. Systems 25:9–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feuerverger A, He Y, Khatri S (2012) Statistical significance of the Netflix challenge. Statist. Sci. 27(2):202–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Yeung C-MA (2014) “Popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Hammer B (2017) Feature launch: Follow your favorite Kaggle Users | Kaggle. Retrieved January 25, 2019, https://www.kaggle.com/general/33512.Google Scholar
• Havakhor T, Sabherwal R (2018) Team processes in virtual knowledge teams: The effects of reputation signals and network density. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):266–318.Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck B (2018) Online reputation mechanisms and the decreasing value of chain affiliation. J. Marketing Res. 55(5):636–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutter K, Füller J, Hautz J, Bilgram V, Matzler K (2015) Machiavellianism or morality: Which behavior pays off in online innovation contests? J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jabr W, Mookerjee R, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2014) Leveraging philanthropic behavior for customer support: The case of user support forums. MIS Quart. 38(1):187–208.Google Scholar
• Jain S, Deodhar SJ (2021) Social mechanisms in crowdsourcing contests: A literature review. Behav. Inform. Tech. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1880638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin J, Li Y, Zhong X, Zhai L (2015) Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community. Inform. Management 52(7):840–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Lee HCB, Ba S, Stallaert J (2021) Winning by learning? Effect of knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):836–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Karamouzis F, Jivan R, Doering K, van der Heiden G, Rold C, Maurer W, Anderson E (2014) Predicts 2015: Sourcing strategies shift from “built to last” to “built to adapt.” Retrieved April 10, 2019, https://www.gartner.com/doc/2925517/predicts-sourcing-strategies-shift.Google Scholar
• Khasraghi HJ, Wang X, Hirschheim R (2017) Sustaining participant involvement in crowdsourcing contests through collaboration. Proc. Amer. Conf. on Inform. Systems: A Tradition of Innovation (Association of Information Systems). https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/Virtual/Presentations/15/.Google Scholar
• Klein TJ, Lambertz C, Stahl KO (2016) Market transparency, adverse selection, and moral hazard. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1677–1713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kokkodis M, Ipeirotis P (2016) Reputation transferability in online labor markets. Management Sci. 62(6):1687–1706.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.Link, Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemus J, Marshall G (2021) Dynamic tournament design: Evidence from prediction contests. J. Political Econom. 129(2):383–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Munro M (2012) Systematic analysis of centralized online reputation systems. Decision Support Systems 52(2):438–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ravichandran T (2015) Alliance experience, IT-enabled knowledge integration, and ex-ante value gains. Organ. Sci. 26(2):511–530.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Santhanam R, Webster J (2017) Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quart. 41(4):1011–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62:3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Mazzola E, Acur N, Piazza M, Perrone G (2018) “To own or not to own?” A study on the determinants and consequences of alternative intellectual property rights arrangements in crowdsourcing for innovation contests. J. Production Innovative Management 35(6):908–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mcfarland LA, Ployhart RE (2015) Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1653–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Mills B, Carter O, Rudd C, Claxton L, O’Brien R (2016) An experimental investigation into the extent social evaluation anxiety impairs performance in simulation-based learning environments amongst final-year undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Edu. Today 45:9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2018) Know when to run: Recommendations in crowdsourcing contests. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moqri M, Mei X, Qiu L, Bandyopadhyay S (2018) Effect of “following” on contributions to open source communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1188–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson L (2017) Google makes changes to star rating system. Retrieved April 26, 2020, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/google-makes-changes-star-rating-system-laura-e-nelson.Google Scholar
• Pan Z, Lu Y, Wang B, Chau PYK (2017) Who do you think you are? Common and differential effects of social self-identity on social media usage. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(1):71–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pétavy F (2017) 2017 state of crowdsourcing report: Welcome to the age of ideation. Accessed December 10, 2021, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2017-state-crowdsourcing-report-welcome-age-ideation-pétavy.Google Scholar
• Pollok P, Lüttgens D, Piller FT (2019) Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status. Res. Policy 48(1):98–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Arikan I, Pye J, Tiwana A (2015) Fit and misfit of plural sourcing strategies and IT-enabled process integration capabilities: Consequence of firm performance in The U.S. Electric Utility Industry. MIS Quart. 39(4):865–886.Google Scholar
• Rhue L, Sundararajan A (2019) Playing to the crowd: Digital visibility and the social dynamics of purchase disclosure. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1127–1141.Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Woolley A (2017) Teams vs. crowds: A field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and emergent collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Acad. Management Discovery 3(4):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers W (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech. Bull. 3:19–23.Google Scholar
• Rohleder N, Beulen SE, Chen E, Wolf JM, Kirschbaum C (2007) Stress on the dance floor: The cortisol stress response to social-evaluative threat in competitive ballroom dancers. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33(1):69–84.Google Scholar
• Tausczik Y, Wang P (2017) To share, or not to share? Community-level collaboration in open innovation contests. Proc. ACM Human Comput. Interactions 1(2):1–23.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem-solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber S (2010) Bacon: An effective way to detect outliers in multivariate data using Stata (and Mata). Stata J. 10(3):331–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whisman MA, Mcclelland GH (2005) Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. Psych. Assoc. 19(1):111–120.Google Scholar
• Williams RL (2000) A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 56(2):645–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood SL, Lynch JG (2002) Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning. J. Consumer Res. 29(3):416–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO (2022) Leaps in innovation: The bolt versus bannister effect in contests. SSRN Electronic J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376350.Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye S, Gao G, Siva V (2014) Strategic behavior in online reputation systems: Evidence from revoking on Ebay. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):1033–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Singh P, Ghose A (2019) A structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li D, Hou W (2011) Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 15(4):57–88.Crossref, Google Scholar