Digital Multisided Platforms and Women’s Health: An Empirical Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Lending and Abortion Rates

References

• Abel KM, Susser ES, Brocklehurst P, Webb RT (2012) Abortion and mental health: Guidelines for proper scientific conduct ignored. British J. Psychiatry 200(1):74–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Addante AN, Paul R, Dorsey M, McNicholas C, Madden T (2021) Differences in financial and social burdens experienced by patients traveling for abortion care. Women’s Health Issues 31(5):426–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Yellen JL, Katz ML (1996) An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. Quart. J. Econom. 111(2):277–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcorn R (2000) Pro-life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Books, Colorado Springs, CO).Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Christakis NA (2006) Fixed-effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociol. Methodology 36(1):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76(375):598–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvis J-F, Shepherd B (2013) The Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator: A solution to the ‘adding up’ problem in gravity models. Appl. Econom. Lett. 20(6):515–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacon R, Finke R, Jones D (2018) Merging the religious congregations and membership studies: A data file for documenting American religious change. Rev. Religious Res. 60(3):403–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y (1997) Reducing search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Barry J (2013) Crossing the digital divide: Is access to the internet an economic right? Preprint, submitted August 26, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2315307.Google Scholar
• Bearak JM, Burke KL, Jones RK (2017) Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA. Lancet Public Health 2(11):e493–e500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beauchamp A (2016) Abortion costs, separation, and non-marital childbearing. J. Family Econom. Issues 37(2):182–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitler M, Zavodny M (2002) Child Abuse and Abortion Availability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(2):363–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boonstra HD (2016) Abortion in the lives of women struggling financially: Why insurance coverage matters. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 19:46–52.Google Scholar
• Borgmann CE (2009) Abortion, the undue burden standard, and the evisceration of women’s privacy. William & Mary J. Race Gender Soc. Justice 16:291–325.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Smith MD (2003) Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. 49(11):1580–1596.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Chan J (2019) Investigating the relationship between medical crowdfunding and personal bankruptcy in the United States: Evidence of a digital divide. MIS Quart. 43(1):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood B (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmon I, Knizhnik S (2015) Notorious RBG (Dey St. Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Chakravorti S, Roson R (2006) Platform competition in two-sided markets: The case of payment networks. Rev. Network Econom. 5(1):118–142.Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A (2014) Internet’s dirty secret: Assessing the impact of online intermediaries on HIV transmission. MIS Quart. 38(4):955–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A, Seamans R (2016) The internet and racial hate crime: Offline spillovers from online access. MIS Quart. 40(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Mojumder P, Ghose A (2019) The digital Sin City: An empirical study of Craigslist’s impact on prostitution trends. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):219–238.Google Scholar
• Collins C, Alagiri P, Summers T, Morin SF (2002) Abstinence Only vs. Comprehensive Sex Education: What Are the Arguments? What Is the Evidence? (AIDS Research Institute, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Connolly MP, Pollard MS, Hoorens S, Kaplan BR, Oskowitz SP, Silber SJ (2008) Long-term economic benefits attributed to IVF-conceived children: A lifetime tax calculation. Amer. J. Managed Care 14(9):598–604.Google Scholar
• Conover C (2015) Are American taxpayers paying for abortion? Forbes (October 2), https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2015/10/02/are-american-taxpayers-paying-for-abortion/?sh=77b7d1736a4b.Google Scholar
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2016) Proposal on payday, vehicle title, and certain high-cost installment loans. Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 12 CFR Part 1041.Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD (2014) Gone in 60 seconds: The impact of the megaupload shutdown on movie sales. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 33:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobkin LM, Gould H, Barar RE, Ferrari M, Weiss EI, Foster DG (2014) Implementing a prospective study of women seeking abortion in the United States: Understanding and overcoming barriers to recruitment. Women's Health Issues. 24(1):e115–e123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donald SG, Lang K (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue J, Levitt S (2001) The impact of legalized abortion on crime. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):379–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doran F, Nancarrow S (2015) Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. BMJ Sexual Reproductive Health 41(3):170–180.Google Scholar
• Dreweke J (2016) New clarity for the U.S. abortion debate: A steep drop in unintended pregnancy is driving recent abortion declines. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 19:16–22.Google Scholar
• Ellison MA (2003) Authoritative knowledge and single women’s unintentional pregnancies, abortions, adoption, and single motherhood: Social stigma and structural violence. Medical Anthropology Quart. 17(3):322–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flores RE, Yoeun SW, Mesian O, Kaiser BN, McMenamin SB, Su HI (2021) Designing and implementing state-level fertility preservation health insurance benefit mandates. Preprint, submitted June 21, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.13.21258849.Google Scholar
• Freedman S, Jin GZ (2008) Dynamic learning and selection: The early years of Prosper.com. Working paper, University of Maryland and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ginsburg RB (1985) Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade. North Carolina Law Rev. 63:375–386.Google Scholar
• Gohmann SF, Ohsfeldt RL (1993) Effects of price and availability on abortion demand. Contemporary Econom. Policy 11(4):42–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Greenwood B, Song Y (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes Benz: An empirical investigation of the sharing economy and durable goods purchase. Preprint, submitted May 20, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971072.Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood B, Agarwal R (2016) Matching platforms and HIV incidence: An empirical investigation of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Management Sci. 62(8):2281–2303.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood B, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood B, Burtch G, Carnahan S (2017) Unknowns of the gig-economy. Comm. ACM. 60(7):27–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Marketplace or reseller? Management Sci. 61(1):184–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Harper CC, Henderson JT, Darney PD (2005) Abortion in the United States. Annual Rev. Public Health 26:501–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haviland AM, Nagin DS (2005) Causal inferences with group based trajectory models. Psychometrika 70(3):557–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henne MB, Bundorf MK (2008) Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertility Sterility 89(1):66–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hock-Long L, Herceg-Baron R, Cassidy AM, Whittaker PG (2003) Access to adolescent reproductive health services: Financial and structural barriers to care. Perspect. Sex. Reproductive Health 35(3):144–147.Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth LD (2000) Who seeks to adopt a child? Findings from the National Survey of Family Growth (1995). Adoption Quart. 3(3):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2016) The tragedy of your upstairs neighbors: Is the Airbnb negative externality internalized? Preprint, submitted December 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05688.Google Scholar
• Hydari Z, Adjerid I, Striegel A (2019) Health wearables, gamification, and healthful activity. Preprint, written June 15, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3429947 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3429947.Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Khwaja AI, Luttmer EFP, Shue K (2016) Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Management Sci. 62(6):1554–1577.Link, Google Scholar
• Jerman J, Jones RK (2014) Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: Gestational age limits, cost, and harassment. Women’s Health Issues 24(4):e419–e424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jerman J, Jones RK, Onda T (2016) Characteristics of US Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes since 2008 (Guttmacher Institute, New York).Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Jerman J (2014) Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect. Sexual Reproductive Health 46(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Jerman J (2017) Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014. Amer. J. Public Health 107:1904–1909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Kooistra K (2011) Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008. Perspect. Sexual Reproductive Health 43(1):41–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Zolna M (2008) Do numbers matter? Changes in abortion providers between 2000 and 2005. Contraception 78(2):189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Finer LB, Singth S (2010) Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008. (Guttmacher Institute, New York).Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA (2013) At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women. Women’s Health Issues 23(3):e173–e178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EMH (2009) Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture Health Sexuality 11(6):625–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2016) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Littman LL, Zarcadoolas C, Jacobs AR (2009) Introducing abortion patients to a culture of support: A pilot study. Archives Women’s Mental Health 12(6):419–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Major B, Appelbaum M, Beckman L, Dutton MA, Russo NF, West C (2009) Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. Amer. Psychologist 64(9):863–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthews S, Ribar D, Wilhelm M (1997) The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspect. 29(2):52–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medoff MH (2008) The response of abortion demand to changes in abortion costs. Soc. Indicators Res. 87(2):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller S, Wherry LR, Foster DG (2020) The economic consequences of being denied an abortion. NBER Working Paper No. 26662, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morse A (2015) Peer-to-peer crowdfunding: Information and the potential for disruption in consumer lending. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 7:463–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, Kavanaugh ML, De Zordo S, Becker D (2011) Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues 21(3 suppl):S49–S54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn R, Doty MM, Moulds D, Sarnak DO, Shah A (2017) Older Americans were sicker and faced more financial barriers to healthcare than counterparts in other countries. Health Affairs 36(12):2123–2132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Potts M (2010) Abortion perspectives. Eur. J. Contraception Reproductive Health Care 15(3):157–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn DM, Chaudoir SR (2009) Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: The impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma on psychological distress and health. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(4):634–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts SCM, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG (2014) Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States. Women’s Health Issues 24(2):e211–e218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J, Tirole J (2004) Two-sided markets: An overview. Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle.Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider EA (1993) Workability of the undue burden test. Temple Law Rev. 66(3):1003.Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Silva S, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha A, Snow C (2017) Financial regulation case study: Lending Club. Harvard Law School Case Study CSP-028.Google Scholar
• Sitzmann T, Campbell EM (2021) The hidden cost of prayer: Religiosity and the gender wage gap. Acad. Management J. 64(4):1016–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stegman MA (2007) Payday lending. J. Econom. Perspectives 21(1):169–190. Google Scholar
• Steinauer J, Sufrin C (2014) Legislating abortion care. AMA J. Ethics 16:265–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen A, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: A field experiment. Marketing Sci. 29(5):805–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Overby E (2021) How does online lending influence bankruptcy filings? Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 27, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4045.Google Scholar
• Warschauer M (2004) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Lin M (2017) Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 63(12):4236–4257.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (2009) On Roe anniversary, Obama vows to reduce abortions, The Hill (January 22), https://thehill.com/homenews/news/17896-on-roe-anniversary-obama-vows-to-reduce-abortions.Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2018) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar
• Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW (2017) The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. J. Marketing Res. 54(5):687–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziegler M (2017) Liberty and the politics of balance: The undue-burden test after Casey/Hellerstedt. Harvard Civil Rights 52:421–468.Google Scholar