The Hidden Costs and Benefits of Monitoring in the Gig Economy

References

• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Sci. 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Balebako R, Brandimarte L, Cranor LF, Komanduri S, Leon PG, Sadeh N, Schaub F, Sleeper M (2017) Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Surveys 50(3):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams A, Berg J (2017) When home affects pay: An analysis of the gender pay gap among crowdworkers. Preprint, submitted October 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048711.Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2013) Sleights of privacy: Framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. Proc. Ninth Sympos. Usable Privacy Security (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–11.Google Scholar
• Akerlof G (1984) Gift exchange and efficiency-wage theory: Four views. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):79–83.Google Scholar
• Alge BJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):797–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson A, Sojourner A, Umyarov A (2020) Can reputation discipline the gig economy? Experimental evidence from an online labor market. Management Sci. 66(5):1802–1825.Link, Google Scholar
• Berg J, Furrer M, Harmon E, Rani U, Silberman MS (2018) Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Toward decent work in the online world (International Labour Organization, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks JL (2012) Counterbalancing for serial order carryover effects in experimental condition orders. Psych. Methods 17(4):600–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Chauvin K (1991) An interplant test of the efficiency wage hypothesis. Quart. J. Econom. 106(3):769–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Horton JJ (2016) Research note—Are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):403–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan SP (2012) Incentives work: Getting teachers to come to school. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1241–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner G, Maciejovsky B (2007) Risk attitude and market behavior: Evidence from experimental asset markets. J. Econom. Psych. 28(3):338–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filippin A, Crosetto P (2016) A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Sci. 62(11):3138–3160.Link, Google Scholar
• Foxman ER, Kilcoyne P (1993) Information technology, marketing practice, and consumer privacy: Ethical issues. J. Public Policy Marketing 12(1):106–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland N (1982) A note on tax evasion as a function of the quality of information about the magnitude and credibility of threatened fines: Some preliminary research. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 12(1):54–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandy OH Jr (1993) The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information, Critical Studies in Communication and in the Cultural Industries (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Scharkow M (2013) The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psych. Sci. 24(10):1918–1927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedegaard MS, Tyran JR (2018) The price of prejudice. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 10(1):40–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbaugh EE, Everett MK (2013) The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. J. Comput. Comm. 18(3):283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoy MG, Milne G (2010) Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. J. Interactive Advertising 10(2):28–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2020) Unemployment and worker participation in the gig economy: Evidence from an online labor market. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):431–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Hubbard TN (2000) The demand for monitoring technologies: The case of trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 115(2):533–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BCF (2013) Research note—Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• John LK, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2010) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karwatzki S, Dytynko O, Trenz M, Veit D (2017) Beyond the personalization–privacy paradox: Privacy valuation, transparency features, and service personalization. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(2):369–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kays K, Gathercoal K, Buhrow W (2012) Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items? Comput. Human Behav. 28(1):251–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin KD, Borah A, Palmatier RW (2017) Data privacy: Effects on customer and firm performance. J. Marketing 81(1):36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martín-Fernández J, del Cura-González MI, Gómez-Gascón T, Oliva-Moreno J, Domínguez-Bidagor J, Beamud-Lagos M, Pérez-Rivas FJ (2010) Differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for visits by a family physician: A contingent valuation study. BMC Public Health 10(1):236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Pallais A (2017) Valuing alternative work arrangements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3722–3759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(4):1999–2022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore S, Hayes LJB (2018) The electronic monitoring of care work—The redefinition of paid working time. Humans and Machines at Work (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17(c):22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng J (2022) Identification of causal mechanisms from randomized experiments: A framework for endogenous mediation analysis. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print March 4, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1113.Google Scholar
• Sheehan KB (1999) An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. J. Interactive Marketing 13(4):24–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton JM (2000) Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance 13(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton JM, Weiss EM (2000) Electronic monitoring in their own words: An exploratory study of employees’ experiences with new types of surveillance. Comput. Human Behav. 16(4):423–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (1987) The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on price. J. Econom. Literature 25(1):1–48.Google Scholar
• Strack F, Mussweiler T (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(3):437–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend AM, Bennett JT (2003) Privacy, technology, and conflict: Emerging issues and action in workplace privacy. J. Labor Res. 24(2):195–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiswall M, Zafar B (2018) Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):457–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC, Agarwal R (2012) Research note—Effects of individual self-protection, industry self-regulation, and government regulation on privacy concerns: A study of location-based services. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1342–1363.Link, Google Scholar