The Attraction Effect in Crowdfunding

References

• Acquisti A (2009) Nudging privacy: The behavioral economics of personal information. Security Privacy Econom. 7(6):82–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adam M, Wessel M, Benlian A (2019) Of early birds and phantoms: How sold-out discounts impact entrepreneurial success in reward-based crowdfunding. Rev. Management Sci. 13(3):545–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos YJ (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee P, Chatterjee P (2020) Stimulus characteristics and attraction effect: Role of qualitative and quantitative attribute values. Proc. 17th AIMS Internat. Conf. Management (Association of Indian Management Scholars International, Vadodara, India), 1141–1147.Google Scholar
• Bapna S (2019) Complementarity of signals in early-stage equity investment decisions: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 65(2):933–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Bhargava S (2020) How digital design drives user behavior. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February 3), https://hbr.org/2020/02/how-digital-design-drives-user-behavior.Google Scholar
• Bhargava M, Kim J, Srivastava RK (2000) Explaining context effects on choice using a model of comparative judgment. J. Consumer Psych. 9(3):167–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Competition for attention. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):481–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G (2011) Herding behavior as a network externality. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1061–1076.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quart. 38(3):773–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Liu D (2018) The role of provision points in online crowdfunding. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):117–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang W, Yan X, Jin J (2020) The life-cycle influence mechanism of the determinants of financing performance: An empirical study of a Chinese crowdfunding platform. Rev. Management Sci. 14(1):287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Marcolin B, Kelley H, Higgins C (2012) Research commentary—Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1093–1109.Link, Google Scholar
• Cornelius PB, Gokpinar B (2020) The role of customer investor involvement in crowdfunding success. Management Sci. 66(1):452–472.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Zhang DJ (2019) Prosocial goal pursuit in crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter. J. Marketing Res. 56(3):498–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du Z, Li M, Wang K (2019) “The more options, the better?” Investigating the impact of the number of options on backers’ decisions in reward-based crowdfunding projects. Inform. Management 56(3):429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Lee L, Baskin E (2014) The limits of attraction. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):487–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydrych D, Bock AJ, Kinder T, Koeck B (2014) Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital 16(3):247–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Kannan K, Sanyal P (2018) Economic experiments in information systems. MIS Quart. 42(2):595–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha YW, Park S, Ahn HK (2009) The influence of categorical attributes on choice context effects. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):463–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath TB, Chatterjee S (1995) Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality vs. higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. J. Consumer Res. 22(3):268–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedgcock W, Rao AR, Chen HA (2009) Could Ralph Nader’s entrance and exit have helped Al Gore? The impact of decoy dynamics on consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. 46(3):330–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Hu Y, Burtch G (2018) Embeddedness, pro-sociality, and social influence: Evidence from online crowdfunding. MIS Quart. 42(4):1211–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA, Wang K, Shi N (2017) On the role of fairness and social distance in designing effective social referral systems. MIS Quart. 41(3):787–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Li X, Shi M (2015) Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Sci. 34(3):331–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Payne JW, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. 9(1):90–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Payne JW, Puto CP (2014) Let’s be honest about the attraction effect. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):520–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Wang Z, Yang L, Shen J, Hahn J (2021) How rewarding are your rewards? A value-based view of crowdfunding rewards and crowdfunding performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 45(3):562–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ho YC(C), Yan X, Tan Y (2018) Investor platform choice: Herding, platform attributes, and regulations. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):86–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Josiam BM, Hobson JP (1995) Consumer choice in context: The decoy effect in travel and tourism. J. Travel Res. 34(1):45–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaminski JC, Hopp C (2019) Predicting outcomes in crowdfunding campaigns with textual, visual, and linguistic signals. Small Bus. Econom. 55(4):627–649.Google Scholar
• Kickstarter (2021) Stats. Accessed August 19, 2022, https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats?ref=global-footer.Google Scholar
• Kim K, Hann IH (2019) Crowdfunding and the democratization of access to capital—An illusion? Evidence from housing prices. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):276–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Koch JA, Siering M (2019) The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns. Electronic Marketing 29(4):661–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruschke JK, Liddell TM (2018) Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 25(1):155–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL (2017) Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? J. Bus. Venturing 32(1):72–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichters M, Bengart P, Sarstedt M, Vogt B (2017) What really matters in attraction effect research: When choices have economic consequences. Marketing Lett. 28(1):127–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichters M, Sarstedt M, Vogt B (2015) On the practical relevance of the attraction effect: A cautionary note and guidelines for context effect experiments. AMS Rev. 5(1–2):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Bryce C, Hagmann D, Rajpal S (2015) Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behav. Sci. Policy 1(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkoc SA, Hedgcock W, Hoeffler S (2013) Between a rock and a hard place: The failure of the attraction effect among unattractive alternatives. J. Consumer Psych. 23(3):317–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra AN, Konana P, Barua A (2007) Antecedents and consequences of internet use in procurement: An empirical investigation of U.S. manufacturing firms. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):103–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray A, Kotha S, Fisher G (2020) Community-based resource mobilization: How entrepreneurs acquire resources from distributed non-professionals via crowdfunding. Organ. Sci. 31(4):960–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(28):485–500.Google Scholar
• Overby E (2008) Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organ. Sci. 19(2):277–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Schielzeth H, Nakagawa S (2013) Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model era. Methods Ecology Evolution 4(1):14–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Weinmann M, vom Brocke J (2018) Digital nudging: Guiding online user choices through interface design. Comm. ACM 61(7):67–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons A, Weinmann M, Tietz M, vom Brocke J (2017) Which reward should I choose? Preliminary evidence for the middle-option bias in reward-based crowdfunding. Proc. 50th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 4344–4353.Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Bailey J, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Understanding Digital Markets: Review and Assessment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1976) Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Tams S, Thatcher JB, Grover V (2018) Concentration, competence, confidence, and capture: An experimental study of age, interruption-based technostress, and task performance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(9):857–908.Google Scholar
• Trueblood JS (2012) Multialternative context effects obtained using an inference task. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 19(5):962–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trueblood JS, Pettibone JC (2017) The phantom decoy effect in perceptual decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 30(2):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trueblood JS, Brown SD, Heathcote A, Busemeyer JR (2013) Not just for consumers: Context effects are fundamental to decision making. Psych. Sci. 24(6):901–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinmann M, Tietz M, Simons A, vom Brocke J (2017) Get it before it’s gone? How limited rewards influence backers’ choices in reward-based crowdfunding. Proc. 38th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/Peer-to-Peer/Presentations/18.Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Tan X, Dong M, Qi J (2014) How to design your project in the online crowdfunding market? Evidence from Kickstarter. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/EconomicsandValue/12.Google Scholar
• Xu J, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2020) The relative effect of the convergence of product recommendations from various online sources. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(3):788–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Wang Z, Hahn J (2020) Scarcity strategy in crowdfunding: An empirical exploration of reward limits. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1107–1131.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lynn M (2014) More evidence challenging the robustness and usefulness of the attraction effect. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):508–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi C, Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2017) Designing for diagnosticity and serendipity: An investigation of social product-search mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):413–429.Link, Google Scholar