Pushing Yourself Harder: The Effects of Mobile Touch Modes on Users’ Self-Regulation

References

• Ackerman JM, Nocera CC, Bargh JA (2010) Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Sci. 328(5986):1712–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):796–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Antoine A, Malacria S, Casiez G (2017) Forceedge: Controlling autoscroll on both desktop and mobile computers using the force. Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM), 3281–3292.Google Scholar
• Arigo D, Brown MM, Pasko K, Suls J (2020) Social comparison features in physical activity promotion apps: Scoping meta-review. J. Medical Internet Res. 22(3):e15642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(2):147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Morsella E (2008) The unconscious mind. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(1):73–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:617–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Tice DM (2007) The strength model of self-control. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 16(6):351–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bickmore T, Mauer D, Crespo F, Brown T (2007) Persuasion, task interruption and health regimen adherence. Internat. Conf. Persuasive Tech. (Springer), 1–11.Google Scholar
• Brasel SA, Gips J (2014) Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. J. Consumer Psych. 24(2):226–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brengman M, Willems K, Van Kerrebroeck H (2019) Can’t touch this: The impact of augmented reality versus touch and non-touch interfaces on perceived ownership. Virtual Reality 23(3):269–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briñol P, Petty RE, Santos D, Mello J (2017) Meaning moderates the persuasive effect of physical actions: Buying, selling, touching, carrying, and cleaning thoughts as if they were commercial products. J. Assoc. Consumer Res. 2(4):460–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Priester JR, Berntson GG (1993) Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (2001) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Cesario J, Grant H, Higgins ET (2004) Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(3):388–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Price A (2009) Healthy living with persuasive technologies: Framework, issues, and challenges. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 16(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Baird A, Straub D (2019) Fostering participant health knowledge and attitudes: An econometric study of a chronic disease-focused online health community. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):194–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi B, Jiang Z (2018) Encouraging active lifestyle with social sharing: A study on mobile fitness app. Proc. 2018 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS). Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar
• Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine Sci. Sports Exercise 35(8):1381–1395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Ferguson MJ (2016) “Whether I like it or not, it’s important”: Implicit importance of means predicts self-regulatory persistence and success. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(6):818–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dourish P (2004) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Elder RS, Mohr GS (2016) The crunch effect: Food sound salience as a consumption monitoring cue. Food Quality Preference 51:39–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enkavi AZ, Eisenberg IW, Bissett PG, Mazza GL, MacKinnon DP, Marsch LA, Poldrack RA (2019) Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(12):5472–5477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etkin J (2016) The hidden cost of personal quantification. J. Consumer Res. 42(6):967–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GJ (2008) Death to Dichotomizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fogarty JS, Youngs GA (2000) Psychological reactance as a factor in patient noncompliance with medication taking: A field experiment. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 30(11):2365–2391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A (2013) The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 10(1):e1001363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frost JH, Massagli MP (2008) Social uses of personal health information within Patientslikeme, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another’s data. J. Medical Internet Res. 10(3):e15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulham E, Mullan B (2011) Hygienic food handling behaviors: Attempting to bridge the intention-behavior gap using aspects from temporal self-regulation theory. J. Food Protection 74(6):925–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gailliot MT, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Maner JK, Plant EA, Tice DM, Brewer LE, Schmeichel BJ (2007) Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(2):325–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons FX, Buunk BP (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(1):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB (2013) Editor’s comments: Information systems research and behavioral economics. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):iii–viii.Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow S, Beilock SL (2010) Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 5(6):664–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez P, Borges A, Pechmann CC (2013) Avoiding poor health or approaching good health: Does it matter? The conceptualization, measurement, and consequences of health regulatory focus. J. Consumer Psych. 23(4):451–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenaway KH, Storrs KR, Philipp MC, Louis WR, Hornsey MJ, Vohs KD (2015) Loss of control stimulates approach motivation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 56:235–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Botti S, Faro D (2013) Turning the page: The impact of choice closure on satisfaction. J. Consumer Res. 40(2):268–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadi R, Valenzuela A (2014) A meaningful embrace: Contingent effects of embodied cues of affection. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):520–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NL, Harris J (2006) The process by which relative autonomous motivation affects intentional behavior: Comparing effects across dieting and exercise behaviors. Motivation Emotion 30(4):306–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones C, Schmeichel BJ, Mennitt E, Harmon-Jones E (2011) The expression of determination: Similarities between anger and approach-related positive affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 100(1):172–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heo S, Lee G (2011) Force gestures: Augmenting touch screen gestures with normal and tangential forces. Proc. 24th Annual ACM Sympos. User Interface Software Tech. (ACM), 621–626.Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30:1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollands GJ, Marteau TM, Fletcher PC (2016) Non-conscious processes in changing health-related behaviour: A conceptual analysis and framework. Health Psych. Rev. 10(4):381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H (2011) An extension of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) in television health news: The influence of health consciousness on individual message processing and acceptance. Health Comm. 26(4):343–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horne R, Weinman J (2002) Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: Exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining non-adherence to preventer medication. Psych. Health 17(1):17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hostetter AB, Alibali MW (2008) Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 15(3):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hung IW, Labroo AA (2011) From firm muscles to firm willpower: Understanding the role of embodied cognition in self-regulation. J. Consumer Res. 37(6):1046–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurtienne J, Israel JH (2007) Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Tangible Embedded Interaction (ACM), 127–134.Google Scholar
• Hurtienne J, Löffler D, Gadegast P, Hußlein S (2015) Comparing pictorial and tangible notations of force image schemas. Proc. Ninth Internat. Conf. Tangible, Embedded Embodied Interaction (ACM), 249–256.Google Scholar
• Inzlicht M, Werner KM, Briskin JL, Roberts BW (2021) Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Rev. Psych. 72:319–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ipsos (2020) Optimism and anxieties during Covid-19 outbreak. Accessed September 21, 2021, https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2020-03/optimism_and_anxieties_during_covid-19_outbreak_0312_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Iversen AC, Kraft P (2006) Does socio-economic status and health consciousness influence how women respond to health related messages in media? Health Ed. Res. 21(5):601–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janz NK, Becker MH (1984) The health belief model: A decade later. Health Ed. Quart. 11(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Hariharan S (2017) Public health awareness: Knowledge, attitude and behaviour of the general public on health risks during the H1N1 influenza pandemic. J. Public Health 25(3):333–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller PA (2006) Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. J. Consumer Res. 33(1):109–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenkel DS (1991) Health behavior, health knowledge, and schooling. J. Political Econom. 99(2):287–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsh D (2013) Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interaction 20(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A, Schwarz N (2013) Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction. J. Consumer Psych. 24(3):159–168.Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Adaval R (2018) Going against the flow: The effects of dynamic sensorimotor experiences on consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 44(6):1358–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labroo AA, Nielsen JH (2009) Half the thrill is in the chase: Twisted inferences from embodied cognitions and brand evaluation. J. Consumer Res. 37(1):143–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert F (2021) Tesla’s new steering wheel comes with autopilot sensor-based drive modes, force touch buttons, and more. Accessed March 21, 2021, https://electrek.co/2021/01/27/tesla-new-steering-wheel-force-touch-buttons-autopilot-sensors/.Google Scholar
• Landau MJ, Meier BP, Keefer LA (2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psych. Bull. 136(6):1045–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):212–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Aaker JL (2004) Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(2):205–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Schwarz N (2010) Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Sci. 328(5979):709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Schwarz N (2012) Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(5):737–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C-W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2019) Unraveling the “social” in social norms: The conditioning effect of user connectivity. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1272–1295.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jiang Z (2020) Harder and smoother on touchscreens? How interaction mode affects consumer product judgment. Proc. 2020 Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS). Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jiang Z, Chan HC (2019) Touching products virtually: Facilitating consumer mental imagery with gesture control and visual presentation. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(3):823–854.Google Scholar
• Loef M, Walach H (2012) The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine 55(3):163–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo C, Shen Y, Liu Y, Jiang Z (2019) Look and feel: The importance of sensory feedback in virtual product experience. Proc. 2019 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS). Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar
• Madzharov AV (2019) Self-control and touch: When does direct versus indirect touch increase hedonic evaluations and consumption of food. J. Retailing 95(4):170–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann T, De Ridder D, Fujita K (2013) Self-regulation of health behavior: Social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psych. 32(5):487–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall P, Antle A, Hoven EVD, Rogers Y (2013) Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interaction 20(1):1–3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauney D, Howarth J, Wirtanen A, Capra M (2010) Cultural similarities and differences in user-defined gestures for touchscreen user interfaces. CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM), 4015–4020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier BP, Schnall S, Schwarz N, Bargh JA (2012) Embodiment in social psychology. Topics Cognitive Sci. 4(4):705–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metcalfe J, Mischel W (1999) A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psych. Rev. 106(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milyavskaya M, Inzlicht M, Hope N, Koestner R (2015) Saying “no” to temptation: Want-to motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 109(4):677–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mischel W (1996) From Good Intentions to Willpower (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Ayduk O, Berman MG, Casey B, Gotlib IH, Jonides J, Kross E, Teslovich T, Wilson NL, Zayas V (2011) “Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Soc. Cognitive Affective Neuroscience 6(2):252–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muraven M, Baumeister RF, Tice DM (1999) Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. J. Soc. Psych. 139(4):446–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murgraff V, Walsh J, McDermott M (2000) The application of Bagozzi & Edwards’s theory of self-regulation to the prediction of low-risk single-occasion drinking. Psych. Health Medicine 5(4):451–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray E, Hekler EB, Andersson G, Collins LM, Doherty A, Hollis C, Rivera DE, West R, Wyatt JC (2016) Evaluating digital health interventions: Key questions and approaches. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 5(51):843–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newsom JT, McFarland BH, Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Zani B (2005) The health consciousness myth: Implications of the near independence of major health behaviors in the North American population. Soc. Sci. Medicine 60(2):433–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niedenthal PM (2007) Embodying emotion. Sci. 316(5827):1002–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niedenthal PM, Barsalou LW, Winkielman P, Krauth-Gruber S, Ric F (2005) Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 9(3):184–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LA, Leventhal H, Leventhal EA (2012) Physicians’ communication of the common‐sense self‐regulation model results in greater reported adherence than physicians’ use of interpersonal skills. British J. Health Psych. 17(2):244–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinder C, Vermeulen J, Beale R, Hendley R (2015) Exploring nonconscious behaviour change interventions on mobile devices. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Human-Comput. Interaction Mobile Devices Services Adjunct (ACM), 1010–1017.Google Scholar
• Pinder C, Vermeulen J, Cowan BR, Beale R (2018) Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interaction 25(3):1–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plank RE, Gould SJ (1990) Health consciousness, scientific orientation and wellness: An examination of the determinants of wellness attitudes and behaviors. Health Marketing Quart. 7(3–4):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn P (2019) Estimating touch force with barometric pressure sensors. Proc 2019 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM), 689.Google Scholar
• Reimann M, Feye W, Malter AJ, Ackerman JM, Castano R, Garg N, Kreuzbauer R, Labroo AA, Lee AY, Morrin M (2012) Embodiment in judgment and choice. J. Neuroscience Psych. Econom. 5(2):104–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rippetoe PA, Rogers RW (1987) Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(3):596–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubino D (2021) Haptic touchpads are finally coming to Windows laptops. Here’s why it matters. Accessed March 21, 2021, https://www.windowscentral.com/sensel-haptic-touchpad-windows-pc.Google Scholar
• Sapp SG, Jensen HH (1997) Reliability and validity of nutrition knowledge and diet-health awareness tests developed from the 1989–1991 diet and health knowledge surveys. J. Nutrition Ed. 29(2):63–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (2011) Feelings-as-information theory. Lange PAMV, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 289–308.Google Scholar
• Sheeran P, Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (2013) Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psych. 32(5):460–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen H, Zhang M, Krishna A (2016) Computer interfaces and the “direct-touch” effect: Can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? J. Marketing Res. 53(5):745–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson RJ (2016) Psychological correlates of habitual diet in healthy adults. Psych. Bull. 143(1):53–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sultan AJ, Joireman J, Sprott DE (2012) Building consumer self-control: The effect of self-control exercises on impulse buying urges. Marketing Lett. 23(1):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talmy L (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Sci. 12(1):49–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh B, Schmitt J, Warlop L (2011) Embodied myopia. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1033–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Baumeister RF (2004) Understanding Self-Regulation: An Introduction (Guildford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• von Lengerke T, Lutze B, Graf K, Krauth C, Lange K, Schwadtke L, Stahmeyer J, Chaberny I (2015) Psychosocial determinants of self-reported hand hygiene behaviour: A survey comparing physicians and nurses in intensive care units. J. Hospital Infection 91(1):59–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisie F (2004) Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann. Behav. Medicine 27(2):107–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinmann M, Schneider C, vom Brocke J (2016) Digital nudging. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 58(6):433–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werner KM, Milyavskaya M (2019) Motivation and self‐regulation: The role of want‐to motivation in the processes underlying self‐regulation and self‐control. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 13(1):e12425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White PA (2012) The experience of force: The role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments. Psych. Bull. 138(4):589–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LE, Bargh JA, Nocera CC, Gray JR (2009) The unconscious regulation of emotion: Nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. Emotion 9(6):847–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9(4):625–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolff P, Ritter S, Holmes K (2014) Causation, force, and the sense of touch. Proc. Cognitive Sci. Soc.Google Scholar
• Yi C, Jiang ZJ, Izak B (2015) Enticing and engaging consumers via online product presentations: The effects of restricted interaction design. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):213–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi C, Jiang Z, Li X, Lu X (2019) Leveraging user-generated content for product promotion: The effects of firm-highlighted reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):711–725.Google Scholar
• Zell E, Alicke MD (2009) Self-evaluative effects of temporal and social comparison. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(1):223–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Risen JL (2014) Embodied motivation: Using a goal systems framework to understand the preference for social and physical warmth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(6):965–977.Crossref, Google Scholar