Software Components and Product Variety in a Platform Ecosystem: A Dynamic Network Analysis of WordPress

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Autor DH, Lyle D (2004) Women, war, and wages: The effect of female labor supply on the wage structure at midcentury. J. Political Econom. 112(3):497–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal CC, Reddy CK(2014) Data clustering. Algorithms and Applications, CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series (Chapman Hall, London).Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bakken TE, Jorstad NL, Hu Q, Lake BB, Tian W, Kalmbach BE, Crow M (2021) Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. Nature 598(7879):111–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules. The power of modularity, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, MacCormack A, Rusnak J (2014) Hidden structure: Using network methods to map system architecture. Res. Policy 43(8):1381–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barde BV, Bainwad AM (2017) An overview of topic modeling methods and tools. Internat. Conf. Intelligent Comput. Control Systems (IEEE).Google Scholar
• Battke B, et al. (2016) Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies. Res. Policy 45(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (2005) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM (2012) Probabilistic topic models. Comm. ACM. 55(4):77–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Everett MG (2000) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks 21(4):375–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2015) “Open” disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Res. Policy 44(1):4–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswicker S, Almirall E, Majchrzak A (2019) Optimizing and satisficing: The interplay between platform architecture and producers’ design strategies for platform performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1249–1277.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Burford N, Shipilov AV, Furr NR (2021) How ecosystem structure affects firm performance in response to a negative shock to interdependencies. Strategic Management J. 43(1):30–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves RE (2000) Creative Industries: Contract Between Art and Commerce (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clauset A, et al. (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(6):066111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csermely P, London A, Wu L-Y, Uzzi B (2013) Structure and dynamics of core/periphery networks. J. Complex Networks 1(2):93–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doncheva NT, Assenov Y, Domingues FS, Albrecht M (2012) Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures. Nature Protocols 7(4):670–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doreian P, Batagelj V, Ferligoj A (2005) Generalized Blockmodeling (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):217–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design 6(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J (2020) Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference. Management Sci. 66(10):4772–4787.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google Photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Fortuna MA, Bonachela JA, Levin SA (2011) Evolution of a modular software network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(50):19985–19989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman TL (2017) Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations. (Picador, New York).Google Scholar
• Gallagher RJ, Young JG, Foucault Welles B, et al. (2021) A clarified typology of core-periphery structure in networks. Sci. Adv. 7(12):eabc9800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (1995) Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. 16(S1):93–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Google Scholar
• Gong J, Abhishek V, Li B (2018) Examining the impact of keyword ambiguity on search advertising performance: A topic model approach. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):805–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, India).Google Scholar
• Haefliger S, Von Krogh G, Spaeth S (2008) Code reuse in open source software. Management Sci. 54(1):180–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(2):71.Google Scholar
• Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: J. Econometric Society 1029–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Shen EH, Ng L, Miller JA, van de Lagemaat LN, et al. (2012) An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489(7416):391–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2018) Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy 47(8):1391–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horvath S (2011) Weighted Network Analysis: Applications in Genomics and Systems Biology (Springer Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika 87(3):706–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kojaku S, Masuda N (2017) Finding multiple core-periphery pairs in networks. Phys. Rev. E 96(5):052313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kojaku S, Masuda N (2018) Core-periphery structure requires something else in the network. New J. Phys. 20(4):043012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krzanowski WJ (1975) Discrimination and classification using both binary and continuous variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 70(352):782–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyriakou H, Nickerson JV, Sabnis G (2017) Knowledge reuse for customization: Metamodels in an open design community for 3D printing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):315–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster K (1990) The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. 9(3):189–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9(1):559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larremore DB, et al. (2014) Efficiently inferring community structure in bipartite networks. Phys. Rev. E 90(1):012805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter AJ (2014) The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Res. Policy 43(5):867–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., PMLR.Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Marino A (2015) Three facets of organizational adaptation: Selection, variety, and plasticity. Organ. Sci. 26(3):743–755.Link, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Rose G, Yoo Y (2010) Learning routines and disruptive technological change. Inform. Tech. People 23(2):165–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Manning C, et al. (2014) The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Proc. 52nd Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics: System Demonstrations.Google Scholar
• Mousavi R, Gu B (2019) The impact of Twitter adoption on lawmakers’ voting orientations. Inform. Systems. Res. 30(1):133–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D, et al. (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.Link, Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Papoulis A, Saunders H (1989) Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiao D, Lee SY, Whinston AB, Wei Q (2020) Financial incentives dampen altruism in online prosocial contributions: A study of online reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1361–1375.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramsey JB (1969) Tests for specification errors in classical linear least‐squares regression analysis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 31(2):350–371.Google Scholar
• Rajarajan P, Borrman T, Liao W, Schrode N, Flaherty E, Casiñosamuel Powell C, Yashaswini C, et al. (2018) Neuron-specific signatures in the chromosomal connectome associated with schizophrenia risk. Sci. 362(6420):eaat4311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasz E, Barabási AL (2003) Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 67(2):026112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Sci. 297(5586):1551–1555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Ramaprasad J (2019) The effects of asymmetric social ties, structural embeddedness, and tie strength on online content contribution behavior. Management Sci. 65(7):3398–3422.Link, Google Scholar
• Rombach MP, Porter MA, Fowler JH, Mucha PJ (2014) Core-periphery structure in networks. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 74(1):167–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schubert C et al. (2013) The means of managing momentum: Bridging technological paths and organisational fields. Res. Policy 42(8):1389–1405.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2004) The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. 50(12):1674–1689.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Mihm J, Browning TR (2013) Linking cyclicality and product quality. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):473–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanko MA (2016) Toward a theory of remixing in online innovation communities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):773–791.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2018) Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):829–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L (1992) Organizational determinants of technological-change-toward a sociology of technological evolution. Res. Organ. Behav. 14:311–347.Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E, Von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilkie FG, Kitchenham BA (2000) Coupling measures and change ripples in C++ application software. J. Systems Software 52(2–3):157-164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams G (2017) Linear Algebra with Applications (Jones & Bartlett Learning).Google Scholar
• Xue L, Song P, Rai A, Zhang C, Zhao X (2019) Implications of application programming interfaces for third‐party new app development and copycatting. Production Oper. Management 28(8):1887–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang K, Kannan PK et al.(2021) Identifying market structure: A deep network representation learning of social engagement. J. Marketing 86(4).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yip AM, Horvath S (2007) Gene network interconnectedness and the generalized topological overlap measure. BMC Bioinformatics 8(1):22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Gaiteri C, Bodea LG, Wang Z, McElwee J, Podtelezhnikov AA, Zhang C, Xie T (2013) Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 153(3):707–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Langfelder P, Fuller T, Dong J, Li A, Hovarth S (2010) Weighted gene coexpression network analysis: State of the art. J. Biopharmaceutical Statist. 20(2):281–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou T, et al. (2007) Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. Phys. Rev. E 76(4):046115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM, Wan X (2017) Product variety, sourcing complexity, and the bottleneck of coordination. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1569–1587.Crossref, Google Scholar