Complementarity Between Investment in Information Technology (IT) and IT Human Resources: Implications for Different Types of Firm Innovation

References

• Agarwal R, Ferratt TW (2001) Crafting an HR strategy to meet the need for IT workers. Comm. ACM 44(7):58–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S, Slaughter S (2004) Turnover of information technology professionals: The effects of internal labor market strategies. Database Adv. Inform. Systems 35(3):11–27.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities and firm performance: How resources allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18:763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashraf M, Michas PN, Russomanno D (2020) The impact of audit committee information technology expertise on the reliability and timeliness of financial reporting. Accounting Rev. 95(5):23–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 32(5):2485–1504.Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Langer N, Mehra A, Gopal R, Gupta A (2013) Human capital investments and employee performance: An analysis of IT services industry. Management Sci. 59(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Barczak G, Sultan F, Hultink EJ (2007) Determinants of IT usage and new product performance. J. Production Innovative Management 24(6):600–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Drev M, Kwon N (2019) Get with the program: Software-driven innovation in traditional manufacturing. Management Sci. 65(2):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE (2005) Industry clockspeed and the pace of new product development. Production Oper. Management 14(2):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T (2018) The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 23(6):1241–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Computerworld (2014a) Computerworld: The voice of business technology. Accessed April 27, 2019, https://www.computerworld.com/about/about.html.Google Scholar
• Computerworld (2014b) About Computerworld’s best places to work in IT. Accessed April 27, 2019, https://www.computerworld.com/article/2539833/it-management-best-places-to-work-in-it.html.Google Scholar
• Crossan MM, Apaydin M (2010) A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. J. Management Stud. 47(6):1154–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custódio C, Ferreira MA, Matos P (2019) Do general managerial skills spur innovation? Management Sci. 65(2):459–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Behrens DM (2005) When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy 34(5):717–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1991) The theory of the firm revisited. Williamson OE, Winter SG, eds. The Nature of the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York), 159–178.Google Scholar
• Di Benedetto AC, DeSarbo WS, Song M (2008) Strategic capabilities and radical innovation: An empirical study in three countries. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 55(3):420–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1467–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE, Bridges WP, O’Keefe RD (1984) Organization strategy and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Sci. 30(6):682–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang VW, Tian X, Tice S (2014) Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? J. Finance 69(5):2085–2125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Henfridsson O, Jarvenpaa S (2018) Editorial on generating business and social value from digital entrepreneurship and innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27(4):275–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkner P, Runde J (2019) Theorizing the digital object. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1279–1302.Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Gkeredakis E, Levina N (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):302–323.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Amit R, Villalonga B (2016) Corporate divestitures and family control. Strategic Management J. 37(3):429–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferratt TW, Prasad J, Enns HG (2012) Synergy and its limits in managing information technology professionals. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1175–1194.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferratt TW, Agarwal R, Brown CV, Moore JE (2005) IT human resource management configurations and IT turnover: Theoretical synthesis and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):237–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A (2020) Concentration and agglomeration of IT innovation and entrepreneurship: Evidence from patenting. NBER Working Paper No. 27338, National Burearu of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gao G, Hitt LM (2012) Information technology and trademarks: Implications for product variety. Management Sci. 58(6):1211–1226.Link, Google Scholar
• Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. J. Production Innovative Management 19(2):110–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon SR, Tarafdar M (2010) The IT audit that boosts innovation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. Summer:39–47.Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Kohli R (2012) Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(1):225–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No., National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J (2012) Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Anal. 20(1):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He JJ, Tian X (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):856–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu M (2022) Extending digital ventures through templating. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):285–310.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36:1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2019) Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyriakou H, Nickerson J, Sabnis G (2017) Knowledge reuse for customization: Metamodels in an open design community for 3D printing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):315–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2012) Car Crashes Without Cars: Lessons About Simulation Technology and Organizational Change From Automotive Design (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou B, Wu L (2021) AI on drugs: Can artificial intelligence accelerate drug development? Evidence from a large-scale examination of bio-pharma firms. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3):1451–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):155–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMullin JL, Schonberger B (2020) Entropy-balanced accruals. Rev. Accounting Stud. 25(1):84–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Langer N, Bapna R, Gopal RD (2014) Estimating returns to training in the knowledge economy: A firm level analysis of small and medium enterprises. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(3):757–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2-3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Qian Y, Roberts J (1991) Complementarities, momentum, and the evolution of modern manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):84–88.Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2008) Human capital and institutional effects in the compensation of information technology professionals in the United States. Management Sci. 54(3):415–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Singh M, Žaldokas A (2017) Do corporate taxes hinder innovation? J. Financial Econom. 124(1):195–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S (2003) Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S (2013) Information technology and product/service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(4):215–226.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Baron RA (2009) Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. J. Production Innovative Management 26(4):388–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm-The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter H (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peppard J (2018) Rethinking the concept of the IS organisation. Inform. Systems J. 28(1):76–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peppard J, Edwards C, Lambert R (2011) Clarifying the ambiguous role of the CIO. MIS Quart. Executive 10(1):31–44.Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Ritala P, Harmelinna-Lankkamen P (2013) Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition: The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. J. Production Innovative Management 30(1):154–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom R, Abernathy W (1982) The climate for innovation in industry: The role of management attitudes and practices in consumer electronics. Res. Policy 11:209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Sahaym A, Mithas S, Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Lee HH (2020) Turning liabilities of global operations into assets: IT-enabled social integration capacity and exploratory innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):361–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Stam W (2009) When does community participation enhance the performance of open source software companies? Res. Policy 38:1288–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):239–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson EB, Ramiller NC (2004) Innovating mindfully with in formation technology. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(4):553–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Gordon SR (2007) Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 16(4):253–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Tanriverdi H (2018) Impact of the information technology unit on information technology-embedded product innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):716–751.Google Scholar
• Tian X, Wang TY (2014) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):211–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sorenson C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Trantopoulos K, von Krogh G, Wallin MW, Woerter M (2017) External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viceira L, Ciechanover A (2017) The Wealthfront generation. Harvard Business School Case 216–085, Harvard Business Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
• Voigt C (2020) Synthetic biology 2020-2030: Six commercially-available products that are changing our world. Nature Comm. 11:1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Hitt L, Lou B (2020) Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity. Management Sci. 66(5):2017–2039.Link, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar