Analyzing Frictions in Generalized Second-Price Auction Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1187

References

  • Adam MT, Krämer J, Jähnig C, Seifert S, Weinhardt C (2011) Understanding auction fever: A framework for emotional bidding. Electronic Marketing 21(3):197–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2006) Computational feedback mechanisms for iterative multiunit multiattribute auctions. 16th Workshop Inform. Tech. Systems (Social Science Research Network), 205–210.Google Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2013a) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):956–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Curley SP, Zhang J (2014) De-biasing user preference ratings in recommender systems. RecSys 2014 Workshop on Joint Workshop Interfaces Human Decision Making Recommender Systems (IntRS 2014), 2–9.Google Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 58(4):811–830.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2013b) Impact of information feedback in continuous combinatorial auctions: An experimental study of economic performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(1):55–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2015) Do organic results help or hurt sponsored search performance? Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):695–713.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T (2014) Information frictions in trade. Econometrica 82(6):2041–2083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Desai PS, Shin W (2015) Keyword search advertising and first-page bid estimates: A strategic analysis. Management Sci. 61(3):507–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anenberg E (2016) Information frictions and housing market dynamics. Internat. Econom. Rev. 57(4):1449–1479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Animesh A, Ramachandran V, Viswanathan S (2010) Research note—Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):190–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Animesh A, Viswanathan S, Agarwal R (2011) Competing “creatively” in sponsored search markets: The effect of rank, differentiation strategy, and competition on performance. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):153–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arnon A, Mansour Y (2011) Repeated budgeted second price ad auction. Internat. Sympos. Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer), 7–18.Google Scholar
  • Bae J, Kagel JH (2019) An experimental study of the generalized second price auction. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 63:44–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi RP, Davis FD, Warshaw PR (1992) Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7):659–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Barua A, Mani D, Mehra A (2010) Research commentary—Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):785–795.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bassi V, Nansamba A (2017) Information frictions in the labor market: Evidence from a field experiment in Uganda. Working paper, University College London.Google Scholar
  • Bichler M, Shabalin P, Ziegler G (2013) Efficiency with linear prices? A game-theoretical and computational analysis of the combinatorial clock auction. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):394–417.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Botvinick MM, Niv Y, Barto AG (2009) Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement learning perspective. Cognition 113(3):262–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowling M, Veloso M (2001) Rational and convergent learning in stochastic games. Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.), 1021–1026.Google Scholar
  • Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai H, Ren K, Zhang W, Malialis K, Wang J, Yu Y, Guo D (2017) Real-time bidding by reinforcement learning in display advertising. Proc. 10th ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, 661–670.Google Scholar
  • Calvano E, Calzolari G, Denicolo V, Pastorello S (2020) Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):3267–3297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capasso S (2008) Endogenous information frictions, stock market development and economic growth. Manchester School 76(2):204–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason TN, Kannan KN, Siebert R (2011) An experimental study of information revelation policies in sequential auctions. Management Sci. 57(4):667–688.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekhar AG, Xandri JP (2022) A note on payments in the laboratory for infinite horizon dynamic games with discounting. Econom. Theory, 1–38.Google Scholar
  • Che Y-K, Choi S, Kim J (2017) An experimental study of sponsored-search auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 102:20–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Feng J, Whinston AB (2010) Keyword auctions, unit price contracts, and the role of commitment. Production Oper. Management 19(3):305–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W, Liu T-Y, Yang X (2016b) Reinforcement learning behaviors in sponsored search. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 32(3):358–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016a) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X (2012) Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium. Management Sci. 58(10):1952–1962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper DJ, Fang H (2008) Understanding overbidding in second price auctions: An experimental study. Econom. J. (London.) 118(532):1572–1595.Google Scholar
  • Deng X, Yu J (2009) A new ranking scheme of the GSP mechanism with Markovian users. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer), 583–590.Google Scholar
  • Devanur NR, Kakade SM (2009) The price of truthfulness for pay-per-click auctions. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM), 99–106.Google Scholar
  • Du X, Su M, Zhang XM, Zheng X (2017) Bidding for multiple keywords in sponsored search advertising: Keyword categories and match types. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):711–722.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dudharejia M (2018) Four ways you can use AI to optimize your AdWords campaigns. Accessed May 23, 2021, https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2018/06/13/four-ways-you-can-use-ai-to-optimize-your-adwords-campaigns/.Google Scholar
  • Edelman B, Schwarz M (2010) Optimal auction design and equilibrium selection in sponsored search auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):597–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars’ worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng J, Bhargava HK, Pennock DM (2007) Implementing sponsored search in web search engines: Computational evaluation of alternative mechanisms. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(1):137–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Filiz-Ozbay E, Ozbay EY (2007) Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1407–1418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fukuda E, Kamijo Y, Takeuchi A, Masui M, Funaki Y (2013) Theoretical and experimental investigations of the performance of keyword auction mechanisms. RAND J. Econom. 44(3):438–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao B, Pavel L (2017) On the properties of the softmax function with application in game theory and reinforcement learning. Preprint, submitted April 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00805.Google Scholar
  • Gatti N, Lazaric A, Trovò F (2012) A truthful learning mechanism for contextual multi-slot sponsored search auctions with externalities. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM), 605–622.Google Scholar
  • Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh KH, Bockstedt JC (2013) The framing effects of multipart pricing on consumer purchasing behavior of customized information good bundles. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):334–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Good P (2013) Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 19(2):213–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A, Hall K, Serrano R (2003) Correlated q-learning. ICML, vol. 3, 242–249.Google Scholar
  • Greenwald A, Kannan K, Krishnan R (2010) On evaluating information revelation policies in procurement auctions: A Markov decision process approach. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):15–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guerci E, Kirman A, Moulet S (2014) Learning to bid in sequential Dutch auctions. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 48:374–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo Z, Koehler GJ, Whinston AB (2012) A computational analysis of bundle trading markets design for distributed resource allocation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):823–843.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A, Kannan K, Sanyal P (2018) Economic experiments in information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):595–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hou K, Moskowitz TJ (2005) Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(3):981–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchings C (2014) Reasons to never use Google ads automatic bidding. Accessed March 1, 2022, https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/11/11/never-use-automatic-bidding-in-adwords.Google Scholar
  • Jerath K, Ma L, Park Y-H, Srinivasan K (2011) A “position paradox” in sponsored search auctions. Marketing Sci. 30(4):612–627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel JH, Levin D (2001) Behavior in multi-unit demand auctions: Experiments with uniform price and dynamic Vickrey auctions. Econometrica 69(2):413–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel JH, Harstad RM, Levin D (1987) Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica 55(6):1275–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel JH, Levin D, Harstad RM (1995) Comparative static effects of number of bidders and public information on behavior in second-price common value auctions. Internat. J. Game Theory 24(3):293–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamijo Y (2013) Bidding behaviors for a keyword auction in a sealed-bid environment. Decision Support Systems 56:371–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kempe D, Mahdian M (2008) A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer), 585–596.Google Scholar
  • Ketter W, Collins J, Gini M, Gupta A, Schrater P (2012) Real-time tactical and strategic sales management for intelligent agents guided by economic regimes. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1263–1283.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kiose D, Voudouris V (2015) The ACEWEM framework: An integrated agent-based and statistical modelling laboratory for repeated power auctions. Expert Systems Appl. 42(5):2731–2748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littman ML (1994) Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 157, 157–163.Google Scholar
  • McLaughlin K, Friedman D (2016) Online ad auctions: An experiment. Working Paper 16-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute, Orange, CA.Google Scholar
  • Noti G, Nisan N, Yaniv I (2014) An experimental evaluation of bidders’ behavior in ad auctions. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web ACM, 619–630.Google Scholar
  • Qin T, Chen W, Liu T-Y (2015) Sponsored search auctions: Recent advances and future directions. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 5(4):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romero J, Rosokha Y (2019) A model of adaptive reinforcement learning. Preprint, submitted April 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3350711.Google Scholar
  • Rosokha Y, Younge K (2020) Motivating innovation: The effect of loss aversion on the willingness to persist. Rev. Econom. Stat. 102(3):569–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm TW, Crites RH (1996) Multiagent reinforcement learning in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Biosystems 37(1–2):147–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanyal P (2016) Characteristics and economic consequences of jump bids in combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):347–364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sheremeta RM (2010) Experimental comparison of multi-stage and one-stage contests. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):731–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shteingart H, Loewenstein Y (2014) Reinforcement learning and human behavior. Current Opinion Neurobiology 25:93–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silvetti M, Verguts T (2012) Reinforcement learning, high-level cognition, and the human brain. Neuroimaging—Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience (Chapter 14) (IntechOpen), 283–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonov A, Nosko C, Rao JM (2018) Competition and crowd-out for brand keywords in sponsored search. Marketing Sci. 37(2):200–215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Statista (2022) Advertising revenue of Google from 2001 to 2021. Accessed March 1, 2022, https://www.statista.com/statistics/266249/advertising-revenue-of-google/.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(6):1163–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (2009) Online ad auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):430–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watkins CJ, Dayan P (1992) Q-learning. Machine Learn. 8(3–4):279–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu D, Chen X, Yang X, Wang H, Tan Q, Zhang X, Xu J, Gai K (2018) Budget constrained bidding by model-free reinforcement learning in display advertising. Proc. 27th ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management, 1443–1451.Google Scholar
  • Xu L, Chen J, Whinston A (2012) Effects of the presence of organic listing in search advertising. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1284–1302.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Feng J (2011) Cyclical bid adjustments in search-engine advertising. Management Sci. 57(9):1703–1719.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou Y, Chakrabarty D, Lukose R (2008) Budget constrained bidding in keyword auctions and online knapsack problems. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer), 566–576.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.