Satisfaction to Stay, Regret to Switch: Understanding Post-adoption Regret in Choosing Competing Technologies When Herding

References

• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory (Prentice-Hall, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay D, Higgins CA, Thompson RL (1995) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. 2(2):285–309.Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quart. 34(4):689–A683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Park SC (2014) Why end-users move to the cloud: A migration-theoretic analysis. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(3):357–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quart. 28(2):229–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Limayem M, Cheung CMK (2012) User switching of information technology: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test. Inform. Management 49(7-8):327–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Sharma S (2000) Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Econom. Rev. 47(3):279–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boles TL, Messick DM (1995) A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 61(3):262–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bougie R, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M (2003) Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 31(4):377–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang IC, Liu CC, Chen K (2014) The push, pull and mooring effects in virtual migration for social networking sites. Inform. Systems J. 24(4):323–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaplin JP (1975) Dictionary of Psychology (Dell, New York).Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22:1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Thatcher JB, Wright RT (2012) Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quart. 36(3):1003–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Thatcher JB, Wright RT, Steel D (2013) Controlling for common method variance in PLS analysis: The measured latent marker variable approach. New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods (Springer, New York), 231–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V, Karahanna E (2008) The relative advantage of electronic channels: A multidimensional view. MIS Quart. 32(1):179–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: Science and Practice (Pearson, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. 23(2):145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly T, Zeelenberg M (2002) Regret in decision making. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 11(6):212–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das N, Kerr AH (2010) Woulda, coulda, shoulda: A conceptual examination of the sources of postpurchase regret. J. Marketing Theory Practice 18(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2009) Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 33(1):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Biswas A, Grewal D (2011) Regret from postpurchase discovery of lower market prices: Do price refunds help? J. Marketing 75(6):124–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Claggett JL, Karahanna E, Kar Yan T (2022) A randomized field experiment to explore the impact of herding cues as catalysts for adoption. MIS Quart. 46(2):1135–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu M, Xiong B, Lim E, Tan C-W, Wang W (2021) Catching audiences’ attention through narrative sensory cues on digital distribution platforms. Proc. Pacific Asia Conf. on Inform. Systems. (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16:91–109.Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Medvec VH (1995) The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psych. Rev. 102(2):379–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Han S, Lerner JS, Keltner D (2007) Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal‐tendency framework. J. Consumer Psych. 17(3):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 43(1):115–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho CK, Ke W, Liu H, Chau PY (2020) Separate versus joint evaluation: The roles of evaluation mode and construal level in technology adoption. MIS Quart. 44(2):725–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inbar Y, Botti S, Hanko K (2011) Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(3):533–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman JJ, Zeelenberg M (2002) Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. J. Consumer Res. 29(1):116–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman JJ, Dyer JS, Jia JM (1997) A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation. Marketing Sci. 16(2):97–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Miller DT (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psych. Rev. 93(2):136–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang YS, Hong S, Lee H (2009) Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret. Comput. Human Behav. 25(1):111–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Xu SX, Zhang N (2015) Psychological ownership motivation and use of social media. J. Marketing Theory Practice 23(2):185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keaveney SM (1995) Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. J. Marketing 59(2):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keaveney SM, Huber F, Herrmann A (2007) A model of buyer regret: Selected prepurchase and postpurchase antecedents with consequences for the brand and the channel. J. Bus. Res. 60(12):1207–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelman HC (1961) Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. 25(1):57–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Son J-Y (2009) Out of dedication or constraint? A dual model of post-adoption phenomena and its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quart. 33(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Viswanathan S (2019) The experts in the crowd: The role of experienced investors in a crowdfunding market. MIS Quart. 43(2):347–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu L (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. MIS Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y, Pinsonneault A, Yu W (2019) What users do besides problem-focused coping when facing IT security threats: An emotion-focused coping perspective. MIS Quart. 43(2):373–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao C, Lin H-N, Luo MM, Chea S (2017) Factors influencing online shoppers’ repurchase intentions: The roles of satisfaction and regret. Inform. Management 54(5):651–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao C, Liu CC, Liu YP, To PL, Lin HN (2011) Applying the expectancy disconfirmation and regret theories to online consumer behavior. CyberPsych. Behav. Soc. Networking 14(4):241–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M, Sabine Gabriele H, Cheung CMK (2007) How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quart. 31(4):705–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin J, Yin J, Wei KK, Chan HC, Teo HH (2022) Comparing competing systems: An extension of the information systems continuance model. MIS Quart. 46(4):1851–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. 92(368):805–824.Google Scholar
• Lowry PB, Gaskin JE, Moody GD (2015) Proposing the multimotive information systems continuance model (MISC) to better explain end-user system evaluations and continuance intentions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(7):515–579.Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in mis and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Thatcher JB, Sun H, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2021) Social networking site use resumption: A model of return migration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(4):1037–1075.Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1981) Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Amer. Behav. Scientist 25(2):179–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A, Markus ML (2009) Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quart. 33(3):433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SC, Keil M, Bock GW, Kim JU (2016) Winner’s regret in online C2C auctions: An automatic thinking perspective. Inform. Systems J. 26(6):613–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker JR, Lehmann DR, Xie Y (2016) Decision comfort. J. Consumer Res. 43(1):113–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peck J, Shu SB (2009) The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):434–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Zeelenberg M (2005) On bad decisions and deciding badly: When intention-behavior inconsistency is regrettable. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97(1):18–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Google Scholar
• Qahri-Saremi H, Turel O (2020) Ambivalence and coping responses in post-adoptive information systems use. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(3):820–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roseman IJ, Wiest C, Swartz TS (1994) Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(2):206–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz B (2004) The tyranny of choice. Scientific Amer. 290(4):70–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen XL, Li YJ, Sun Y, Wang F (2021) Good for use, but better for choice: A relative model of competing social networking services. Inform. Management 58(3):103448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shu SB, Peck J (2011) Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. J. Consumer Psych. 21(4):439–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1992) The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):105–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H (2013) A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. MIS Quart. 37(4):1013–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Fang Y (2010) Toward a model of mindfulness in technology acceptance. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Sun H, Fang Y, Zou HM (2016) Choosing a fit technology: Understanding mindfulness in technology adoption and continuance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(6):377–412.Google Scholar
• Sun H, Luo F, London J, Jiao X (2014) Fashionable technology, fashion waves, and post-adoption regret and satisfaction. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Inform. (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Taylor K (1997) A regret theory approach to assessing consumer satisfaction. Marketing Lett. 8(2):229–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsiros M (1998) Effect of regret on post-choice valuation: The case of more than two alternatives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(1):48–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsiros M, Mittal V (2000) Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 26(4):401–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turel O (2015) Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: A theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(4):431–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijk E, Zeelenberg M (2005) On the psychology of ‘if only’: Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97(2):152–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijk WW, van der Pligt J, Zeelenberg M (1999) Effort invested in vain: The impact of effort on the intensity of disappointment and regret. Motivation Emotion 23(3):203–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Trijp HCV, Hoyer WD, Inman JJ (1996) Why switch? Product category–level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 33(3):281–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walden EA, Browne GJ (2009) Sequential adoption theory: A theory for understanding herding behavior in early adoption of novel technologies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(1):31–62.Google Scholar
• Wright RT, Campbell DE, Thatcher JB, Roberts N (2012) Operationalizing multidimensional constructs in structural equation modeling: Recommendations for IS research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 30(1):367–412.Google Scholar
• Xiong B, Fu M, Wang W (2019) How story works in mobile app stores? Exploring the same-side effect from the storytelling perspective. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond S, Zhang H (2014) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quart. 38(2):539–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M (1999) The use of crying over spilled milk: A note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philosophical Psych. 12(3):325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (1999) Comparing service delivery to what might have been behavioral responses to regret and disappointment. J. Service Res. 2(1):86–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (2004) Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services. J. Bus. Res. 57(4):445–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (2007) A theory of regret regulation 1.0. J. Consumer Psych. 17(1):3–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Van Dijk WW, Manstead AS, van der Pligt J (1998) The experience of regret and disappointment. Cognition Emotion 12(2):221–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg M, Van Dijk WW, Manstead AS, van der Pligt J (2000) On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition Emotion 14(4):521–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Benbasat I, Jiang Z (2010) Let’s shop online together: An empirical investigation of collaborative online shopping support. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):872–891.Link, Google Scholar