Does Social Influence Change with Other Information Sources? A Large-Scale Randomized Experiment in Medical Crowdfunding

References

• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex: Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashar YK, Andrews-Hanna JR, Yarkoni T, Sills J, Halifax J, Dimidjian S, Wager TD (2016) Effects of compassion meditation on a psychological model of charitable donation. Emotion 16(5):691–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S (2019) Complementarity of signals in early-stage equity investment decisions: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 65(2):933–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R, Wiepking P (2011) A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 40(5):924–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnkrant RE, Cousineau A (1975) Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 2(3):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Chan J (2019) Investigating the relationship between medical crowdfunding and personal bankruptcy in the United States: Evidence of a digital divide. MIS Quart. 43(1):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Charles S (2021) What the rise of GoFundMe's to pay medical bills say about US healthcare system. The Grio (September 23), https://thegrio.com/2021/09/23/gofundme-medical-bills-health-care-system/.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1979) Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8):1387–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman CM, Masser BM, Louis WR (2020) Identity motives in charitable giving: Explanations for charity preferences from a global donor survey. Psych. Marketing 37(9):1277–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen JB, Golden E (1972) Informational social influence and product evaluation. J. Appl. Psych. 56(1):54–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 51(3):629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ho Y-J, Ramaprasad J (2017) Popularity or proximity: Characterizing the nature of social influence in an online music community. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):117–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Einolf CJ (2011) Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 40(6):1092–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falomir JM, Invernizzi F (1999) The role of social influence and smoker identity in resistance to smoking cessation. Swiss J. Psych. 58(2):73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Lin M, Wu D (2020) Education crowdfunding and student performance: An empirical study. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):53–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Higgins MC (2003) Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. 24(2):127–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haslam SA, Jetten J, O’Brien A, Jacobs E (2004) Social identity, social influence and reactions to potentially stressful tasks: Support for the self-categorization model of stress. Stress Health 20(1):3–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MJ, Stephan PE, Thursby JG (2011) Conveying quality and value in emerging industries: Star scientists and the role of signals in biotechnology. Res. Policy 40(4):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horrocks M, Walsh KA (1998) Forensic palynology: Assessing the value of the evidence. Rev. Palaeobotany Palynology 103(1–2):69–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Aral S, Hu YJ, Brynjolfsson E (2020) Social advertising effectiveness across products: A large-scale field experiment. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1142–1165.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Lee JY (2015) Social contagion in new product trial and repeat. Marketing Sci. 34(3):408–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Stevenson RM, Letwin CR (2018) A woman’s place is in the…startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. J. Bus. Venturing 33(6):813–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Milkman KL (2018) Identity in charitable giving. Management Sci. 64(2):845–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim JG, Kong HK, Karahalios K, Fu WT, Hong H (2016) The power of collective endorsements: Credibility factors in medical crowdfunding campaigns. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput., San Jose, CA, 4538–4549.Google Scholar
• Kim K, Viswanathan S (2018) The ‘experts’ in the crowd: The role of experienced investors in a crowdfunding market. MIS Quart. 43(2):347–372.Google Scholar
• Kolata G (2011) How bright promise in cancer testing fell apart. New York Times (July 7), https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/health/research/08genes.html.Google Scholar
• Landrigan PJ (2004) Children as a vulnerable population. Internat. J. Occupational Medicine Environ. Health 17(1):175–178.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2021) How do product attributes and reviews moderate the impact of recommender systems through purchase stages? Management Sci. 67(1):524–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Lucas HC Jr, Shmueli G (2013) Research commentary—too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):906–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Cheng T, Wang H (2020) Effects of attention and reliability on the performance of online medical crowdfunding projects: The moderating role of target amount. J. Management Sci. Engrg. 5(3):162–171.Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manuel JI (2018) Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in healthcare use and access. Health Services Res. 53(3):1407–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton FMS, Podolny JM (2002) Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry. J. Indust. Econom. 50(4):431–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Chen G, Jackson EM, Hambrick DC (2010) How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):6–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Shi Z, Whinston AB (2018) Learning from your friends’ check-ins: An empirical study of location-based social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):1044–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramaswami A, Dreher GF, Bretz R, Wiethoff C (2010) Gender, mentoring, and career success: The importance of organizational context. Personnel Psych. 63(2):385–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regitz-Zagrosek V, Petrov G, Lehmkuhl E, Smits J, Babitsch B, Brunhuber C, Jurmann B, et al. (2010) Heart transplantation in women with dilated cardiomyopathy. Transplantation 89(2):236–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen AB, Schneider EC (2004) Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender. J. General Internal Med. 19(4):332–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steigenberger N, Wilhelm H (2018) Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organ. Sci. 29(3):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Dukerich JM, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strodtbeck FL, James RM, Hawkins C (1957) Social status in jury deliberations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):713–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Roy S, Cherian M (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35(6):849–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1991) Social Influence (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK).Google Scholar
• Wu L, Kane GC (2021) Network-biased technical change: How modern digital collaboration tools overcome some biases but exacerbate others. Organ. Sci. 32(2):273–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Young MJ, Scheinberg E (2017) The rise of crowdfunding for medical care: Promises and perils. JAMA 317(16):1623–1624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Pavlou PA, Krishnan R (2018) On direct vs. indirect peer influence in large social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):292–314.Link, Google Scholar