Are You, You? Seamlessly Fighting Identity Fraud with Keystroke Dynamics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0088

References

  • ABBYY (2022) ABBYY state of intelligent automation report Q4-2022. Report, ABBYY, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  • Acien A, Morales A, Vera-Rodriguez R, Fierrez J, Monaco JV (2020) TypeNet: Scaling up keystroke biometrics. IEEE Internat. Joint Conf. Biometrics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–7.Google Scholar
  • Ali ML, Monaco JV, Tappert CC, Qiu M (2017) Keystroke biometric systems for user authentication. J. Signal Processing Systems 86(2):175–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ante L, Fischer C, Strehle E (2022) A bibliometric review of research on digital identity: Research streams, influential works and future research paths. J. Manufacturing Systems 62(1):523–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey KO, Okolica JS, Peterson GL (2014) User identification and authentication using multi-modal behavioral biometrics. Comput. Security 43(1):77–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M (2020) Combating new account fraud in the digital age. Payments J. (September 11), https://www.paymentsjournal.com/combating-new-account-fraud-in-the-digital-age/.Google Scholar
  • Baskerville R, Baiyere A, Gergor S, Hevner A, Rossi M (2018) Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(5):358–376.Google Scholar
  • Bhattacharyya S, Jha S, Tharakunnel K, Westland JC (2011) Data mining for credit card fraud: A comparative study. Decision Support Systems 50(3):602–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton RJ, Hand DJ (2002) Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statist. Sci. 17(3):235–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buller DB, Burgoon JK (1996) Interpersonal deception theory. Comm. Theory 6(3):203–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron K (2005) The laws of identity. Identity Blog (May 11), https://www.identityblog.com/stories/2005/05/13/TheLawsOfIdentity.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Carrión RE, Keenan JP, Sebanz N (2010) A truth that’s told with bad intent: An ERP study of deception. Cognition 114(1):105–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cockburn A, Gutwin C, Scarr J, Malacria S (2014) Supporting novice to expert transitions in user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surveys 47(2):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (2013) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ContentSquare (2026) Digital experience benchmark report. Accessed February 8, 2026, https://go.contentsquare.com/en/digital-experience-benchmark.Google Scholar
  • Crump MJC, Logan GD (2010) Hierarchical control and skilled typing: Evidence for word-level control over the execution of individual keystrokes. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 36(6):1369–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2018) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech. 33(2):124–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas BD, Ewell PJ, Brauer M (2023) Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLoS One 18(3):e0279720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards WH (2010) Motor Learning and Control: From Theory to Practice (Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Equifax (2015) Back to the future: The resurgence of new-account fraud. Report, Equifax, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Feher C, Elovici Y, Moskovitch R, Rokach L, Schclar A (2012) User identity verification via mouse dynamics. Inform. Sci. 201(1):19–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A (2016) The rise of social bots. Comm. ACM 59(7):96–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FICO (2021) Riding the digital wave. Accessed July 12, 2023, https://www.fico.com/en/latest-thinking/white-paper/emea-insights-originations.Google Scholar
  • Giolla EM, Luke TJ (2021) Does the cognitive approach to lie detection improve the accuracy of human observers? Appl. Cognitive Psych. 35(2):385–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gliner JA (1985) Purposeful activity in motor learning theory: An event approach to motor skill acquisition. Amer. J. Occupational Therapy 39(1):28–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffredo M, Bouchrika I, Carter JN, Nixon MS (2010) Self-calibrating view-invariant gait biometrics. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics—Part B Cybernetics 40(4):997–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gombos VA (2006) The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic Soc. General Psych. Monographs 132(3):197–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grand View Research (2022) Identity verification market size, share & trends analysis report. Report, Grand View Research, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  • Grassi PA, Fenton JL (2017) Digital identity guidelines: Enrollment and identity proofing. NIST Special Publication 800-63A, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
  • Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quart. 37(2):337–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith S (2013) The jazz practice kinesthetic: Motor learning theory applied to jazz brass practice. Doctor of Musical Arts dissertation, University of Colorado, College of Music, Colorado.Google Scholar
  • Griffo A (2023) Socure achieves industry leading accuracy in verifying the identities of Gen Z consumers. Businesswire.com (May 31), https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230531005209/en/Socure-Achieves-Industry-Leading-Accuracy-in-Verifying-the-Identities-of-Gen-Z-Consumers.Google Scholar
  • Hafner M (2022) 3 considerations for building an effective intelligent friction strategy. BiometricUpdate.com (May 30), https://www.biometricupdate.com/202205/3-considerations-for-building-an-effective-intelligent-friction-strategy.Google Scholar
  • Hajek P, Abedin MZ, Sivarajah U (2022) Fraud detection in mobile payment systems using an XGBoost-based framework. Inform. Systems Frontiers 1(1):1–19.Google Scholar
  • Henfridsson O, Mathiassen L, Svahn F (2014) Managing technological change in the digital age: The role of architectural frames. J. Inform. Tech. 29(1):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoofnagle CJ (2007) Identity theft: Making the known unknowns known. Harvard J. Law Tech. 21(1):97–122.Google Scholar
  • Jagtiani J, Lemieux C (2019) The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform. Financial Management 48(4):1009–1029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jamieson R, Land LPW, Winchester D, Stephens G, Steel A, Maurushat A, Sarre R (2012) Addressing identity crime in crime management information systems: Definitions, classification, and empirics. Comput. Law Security Rev. 28(4):381–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins JL, Grimes M, Proudfoot JG, Lowry PB (2014) Improving password cybersecurity through inexpensive and minimally invasive means: Detecting and deterring password reuse through keystroke-dynamics monitoring and just-in-time fear appeals. Inform. Tech. Development 20(2):196–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins JL, Valacich JS, Zimbelman AF, Zimbelman MF (2021) Detecting noncompliant behavior in organizations: How online survey responses and behaviors reveal risk. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(3):704–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins JL, Proudfoot JG, Valacich JS, Grimes GM, Nunamaker JF Jr (2019) Sleight of hand: Identifying concealed information by monitoring mouse-cursor movements. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(1):1–32.Google Scholar
  • Jordan MI, Mitchell TM (2015) Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245):255–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joyce R, Gupta G (1990) Identity authentication based on keystroke latencies. Comm. ACM 33(2):168–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerby DS (2014) The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psych. 3(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  • Kuhn M, Johnson K (2013) Applied Predictive Modeling (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster GLJ, Vrij A, Hope L, Waller B (2013) Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions on lie detection. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 27(1):107–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane AE, Ziviani JM (2010) Factors influencing skilled use of the computer mouse by school-aged children. Computers Ed. 55(3):1112–1122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNeal GS (2015) Massive data breach at health insurer Anthem reveals social security numbers and more. Forbes (February 4), https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2015/02/04/massive-data-breach-at-health-insurer-anthem-reveals-social-security-numbers-and-more.Google Scholar
  • Monaro M, Gamberini L, Sartori G (2016) Identity verification using a kinematic memory detection technique. Hale K, Stanney K, eds. Adv. Neuroergonomics Cognitive Engrg., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 488 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 123–132.Google Scholar
  • Monaro M, Gamberini L, Sartori G (2017) The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and mouse dynamics. PLoS One 12(5):e0177851.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monaro M, Galante C, Spolaor R, Li QQ, Gamberini L, Conti M, Sartori G (2018) Covert lie detection using keyboard dynamics. Sci. Rep. 8(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monrose F, Rubin AD (2000) Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation Comput. Systems 16(4):351–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy J (2023) How insurance carriers can tackle fraud with behavioral biometrics. Celebrus, https://www.celebrus.com/blogs/fdp/tackle-fraud-behavioral-biometrics-insurance.Google Scholar
  • NameTag (2022) What is NIST IAL2 identity verification? NameTag (October 26), https://www.getnametag.com/newsroom/what-is-nist-ial2-identity-verification.Google Scholar
  • Nuñez JM, Casey BJ, Egner T, Hare T, Hirsch J (2005) Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage 25(1):267–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Gorman L (2003) Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication. Proc. IEEE 91(12):2021–2040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Onwubiko C (2020) Fraud matrix: A morphological and analysis-based classification and taxonomy of fraud. Comput. Security 96(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  • OpenView Partners (2022) OpenView product benchmarks report. Accessed February 9, 2026, https://openviewpartners.com/2022-product-benchmarks/.Google Scholar
  • PaymentsJournal (2023) Too much payments friction can lead to customer chafing. Accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.paymentsjournal.com/too-much-payments-friction-can-lead-to-customer-chafing/.Google Scholar
  • Pindrop (2022) 2022 voice intelligence & security report. Accessed February 9, 2026, https://go.pindrop.com/resources/report/2022-voice-intelligence-and-security-report/.Google Scholar
  • Pollock BJ, Lee TD (1992) Effects of the model’s skill level on observational motor learning. Res. Quart. Exercise Sport 63(1):25–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raul N, Shankarmani R, Joshi P (2020) A comprehensive review of keystroke dynamics-based authentication mechanism. Khanna A, Gupta D, Bhattacharyya S, Snasel V, Platos J, Hassanien A, eds. Internat. Conf. Innovative Comput. Comm., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1059 (Springer, Singapore), 149–162.Google Scholar
  • Richardson B, Waldron D (2019) Fighting back against synthetic identity fraud. McKinsey Company (January 2), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/fighting-back-against-synthetic-identity-fraud.Google Scholar
  • Sabena F, Dehghantanha A, Seddon AP (2010) A review of vulnerabilities in identity management using biometrics. 2010 Second Internat. Conf. Future Networks (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 42–49.Google Scholar
  • Sperl L, Cañal-Bruland R (2020a) Reducing proactive interference in motor tasks. J. Motor Behav. 52(3):372–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sperl L, Cañal-Bruland R (2020b) Interindividual differences in the capability to change automatized movement patterns. Acta Psych. 204(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  • Straits Research (2022) Identity verification market size, share and growth forecast 2030. Report, Straits Research, Pune, India.Google Scholar
  • Tan FTC, Guo Z, Cahalane M, Cheng D (2016) Developing business analytic capabilities for combating e-commerce identity fraud: A study of Trustev’s digital verification solution. Inform. Management 53(7):878–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teh PS, Teoh ABJ, Yue S (2013) A survey of keystroke dynamics biometrics. Sci. World J. 13(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  • Thomas K, Grier C, Song D, Paxson V (2011) Suspended accounts in retrospect: An analysis of Twitter spam. Proc. 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Measurement (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 243–258.Google Scholar
  • Tomberg C, Dwoskin E, Fung BCM (2017) Data of 143 million Americans exposed in hack of credit reporting agency Equifax. Washington Post (September 7), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/equifax-hack-hits-credit-histories-of-up-to-143-million-americans/2017/09/07/a4ae6f82-941a-11e7-b9bc-b2f7903bab0d_story.html.Google Scholar
  • Tomczak M, Tomczak E (2014) The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sports Sci. 1(21):19–25.Google Scholar
  • Trulioo (2017) Challenges for verifying names around the world. Accessed February 9, 2026, https://www.trulioo.com/blog/identity-verification/verifying-names.Google Scholar
  • Velásquez I, Caro A, Rodríguez A (2018) Authentication schemes and methods: A systematic literature review. Inform. Software Tech. 94(1):30–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verburgh L, Scherder EJA, Lange EJA, Oosterlaan J (2016) The key to success in elite athletes? Explicit and implicit motor learning in youth elite and non-elite soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 34(18):1782–1790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vizer LM, Zhou L, Sears A (2009) Automated stress detection using keystroke and linguistic features: An exploratory study. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 67(10):870–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vlasselaer VV, Bravo C, Caelen O, Eliassi-Rad T, Akoglu L, Snoeck M, Baesens B (2015) APATE: A novel approach for automated credit card transaction fraud detection using network-based extensions. Decision Support Systems 75(1):38–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vrij A (2008) Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Vrij A, Fisher RP, Blank H (2017) A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis. Legal Criminological Psych. 22(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinmann M, Valacich JS, Schneider C, Jenkins JL, Hibbeln M (2022) The path of the righteous: Using trace data to understand fraud decisions in real time. MIS Quart. 46(4):2317–2336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Welsh TN, Elliott D (2004) Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 57(6):1031–1057.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West J, Bhattacharya M (2016) Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Comput. Security 57(1):47–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • World Bank Group (2021) ID4D & G2Px annual report. World Bank Group, Washington, DC, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/436051643089705385/pdf/Identification-for-Development-ID4D-and-Digitalizing-G2P-Payments-G2Px-2021-Annual-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Wu Y, Ngai EWT, Wu P, Wu C (2020) Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Decision Support Systems 132(1):1–15.Google Scholar
  • Xu JJ, Chen D, Chau M, Li L, Zheng H (2022) Peer-to-peer loan fraud detection: Constructing features from transaction data. MIS Quart. 46(3):1777–1792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yampolskiy RV, Govindaraju V (2008) Behavioural biometrics: A survey and classification. Internat. J. Biometrics 1(1):81–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zviran M, Haga WJ (1999) Password security: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems 15(4):161–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.