The Costs of Ambiguous Information Disclosure: On the Unintended Consequences of Providing Restaurant Hygiene Scores on Platforms in the United States

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0137

References

  • 2 News Oklahoma (2019) Yelp now shows health scores for Oklahoma restaurants. 2 News Oklahoma (March 15), https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/yelp-now-shows-health-scores-for-oklahoma-restaurants.Google Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avena NM (2015) Introduction. Hedonic Eating: How the Pleasurable Aspects of Food Can Affect Our Brains and Behavior (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babar Y, Adeli A, Burtch G (2023) The effects of online social identity signals on retailer demand. Management Sci. 69(12):7335–7346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner H, Pieters R, Bagozzi RP (2008) Future-oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioral effects. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(4):685–696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brelsford C, Moehl J, Weber E, Sparks K, Tuccillo JV, Rose A (2022) Spatial and temporal characterization of activity in public space, 2019–2020. Sci. Data 9(1):379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breslin PAS (2013) An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Current Biol. 23(9):R409–R418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briers B, Huh YE, Chan E, Mukhopadhyay A (2020) The unhealthy = tasty belief is associated with BMI through reduced consumption of vegetables: A cross-national and mediational analysis. Appetite 150:104639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buss D (2019) Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 6th ed. (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carbone C (2019) Amazon’s choice under fire amid widespread fraud in recommendations. Fox News (August 13), https://www.foxnews.com/tech/amazon-choice-widespread-fraud-recommendations.Google Scholar
  • Carman T (2018) Yelp adds health inspection scores for restaurants and restaurateurs are not happy. Washington Post (July 24), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/voraciously/wp/2018/07/24/yelp-adds-health-inspection-scores-for-restaurants-and-restaurateurs-are-not-happy/.Google Scholar
  • Carpenter J, Preotiuc-Pietro D, Clark J, Flekova L, Smith L, Kern ML, Buffone A, Ungar L, Seligman MJJ, Making D (2018) The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication. Judgment Decision Making 13(6):562–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colby JJ, Elder JP, Peterson G, Knisley PM, Carleton RA (1987) Promoting the selection of healthy food through menu item description in a family-style restaurant. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 3(3):171–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Commerford BP, Hermanson DR, Houston RW, Peters MF (2019) Auditor sensitivity to real earnings management: The importance of ambiguity and earnings context. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(2):1055–1076.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai W, Luca M (2020) Digitizing disclosure: The case of restaurant hygiene scores. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 12(2):41–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfœuille X (2022) Difference-in-differences estimators of intertemporal treatment effects. Rev. Econom. Statist. 2024:1–45.Google Scholar
  • Delamater AR, Lattal MK (2014) The study of associative learning: Mapping from psychological to neural levels of analysis. Neurobiol. Learning Memory 108:1–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar R, Wertenbroch K (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J. Marketing Res. 37(1):60–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dick A, Chakravarti D, Biehal G (1990) Memory-based inferences during consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 17(1):82–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duggan GB, Payne SJ (2011) Skim reading by satisficing: Evidence from eye tracking. CHI ‘11: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1141–1150.Google Scholar
  • Fleetwood J (2019) Scores on doors: Restaurant hygiene ratings and public health policy. J. Public Health Policy 40(4):410–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes (2017) Restaurant hygiene grading law gets a ‘fail’. Forbes (October 6), https://www.forbes.com/sites/omribenshahar/2017/10/06/restaurant-hygiene-grading-law-gets-a-fail/?sh=2763fd0271a2.Google Scholar
  • Fowler G (2021) I checked Apple’s new privacy ‘nutrition labels.’ Many were false. Washington Post (January 29), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/29/apple-privacy-nutrition-label/.Google Scholar
  • Garaus M, Lalicic L (2021) The unhealthy-tasty intuition for online recipes: When healthiness perceptions backfire. Appetite 159:105066.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garaus M, Wolfsteiner E, Hu J (2023) The unhealthy-tasty intuition in dining out situations: The role of health inferences and taste expectations. Frontiers Nutrition 10:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Nag R, Corley KG (2012) Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organizational change. J. Management Inquiry 21(4):364–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GovTech (2016) Yelp now shows health inspection data for all Florida restaurants. GovTech (November 17), https://www.govtech.com/health/yelp-now-shows-health-inspection-data-for-all-florida-restaurants.html.Google Scholar
  • Greenwood BN, Agarwal R (2016) Matching platforms and HIV incidence: An empirical investigation of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Management Sci. 62(8):2281–2303.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurney N, Loewenstein G (2020) Filling in the blanks: What restaurant patrons assume about missing sanitation inspection grades. J. Public Policy Marketing 39(3):266–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods, and propositions. J. Marketing 46(3):92–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho DE (2012) Fudging the nudge: Information disclosure and restaurant grading. Yale Law J. 122(3):574–689.Google Scholar
  • Ho DE, Ashwood ZC, Handan-Nader C (2019) New evidence on information disclosure through restaurant hygiene grading. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):404–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoogeveen HR, Jolij J, ter Horst GJ, Lorist MM (2016) Brain potentials highlight stronger implicit food memory for taste than health and context associations. PLoS One 11(5):e0154128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckfeldt R, Beck PA, Dalton RJ, Levine J, Morgan W (1998) Ambiguity, distorted messages, and nested environmental effects on political communication. J. Politics 60(4):996–1030.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jung JM, Sydnor S, Lee SK, Almanza B (2015) A conflict of choice: How consumers choose where to go for dinner. Internat. J. Hospitality Management 45:88–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim T, Martin D (2021) What do consumers learn from regulator ratings? Evidence from restaurant hygiene quality disclosures. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 185:234–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kivetz R, Simonson I (2002) Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. J. Marketing Res. 39(2):155–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lansky D (2002) Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information. Health Affairs 21(4):52–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Q (2016) Yelp adds restaurant inspection scores for Florida businesses with HDScores. Yelp blog (November 15), https://blog.yelp.com/news/yelp-adds-restaurant-inspection-scores-florida-businesses-hdscores/.Google Scholar
  • Liem DG, Toraman Aydin N, Zandstra EH (2012) Effects of health labels on expected and actual taste perception of soup. Food Quality Preference 25(2):192–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LinkedIn (2025) Post a job on LinkedIn. Retrieved March 1, https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/post-jobs.Google Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Sunstein CR, Golman R (2014) Disclosure: Psychology changes everything. Annual Rev. Econom. 6(1):391–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowe L (2018) Bringing restaurant hygiene scores to Yelp pages everywhere. Yelp Blog (July 24), https://blog.yelp.com/news/lives-national/.Google Scholar
  • Luca M (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Preprint, submitted September 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928601.Google Scholar
  • Mejia J, Mankad S, Gopal A (2019) A for effort? Using the crowd to identify moral hazard in New York City restaurant hygiene inspections. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1363–1386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mellers B, Schwartz A, Ritov I (1999) Emotion-based choice. J. Experiment. Psych. General 128(3):332–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitkina M, Ananthakrishnan UM, Tan Y (2022) Do online reviews enable political consumerism? An empirical analysis of “Black-owned business” reviews on Yelp.com. Preprint, submitted March 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4042411.Google Scholar
  • Naylor RW, Lamberton CP, Norton DA (2011) Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):617–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh G-E (2020) When dessert comes close: The effects of anticipating indulgent consumption and dietary restraint on healthy food preference at restaurants. Internat. J. Hospitality Management 90:102614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozdemir B, Caliskan O (2014) A review of literature on restaurant menus: Specifying the managerial issues. Internat. J. Gastronomy Food Sci. 2(1):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pignatelli M, Bonci A (2015) Role of dopamine neurons in reward and aversion: A synaptic plasticity perspective. Neuron 86(5):1145–1157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pike JC, Bateman PJ, Butler BS (2018) Information from social networking sites: Context collapse and ambiguity in the hiring process. Inform. Systems J. 28(4):729–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan R, Naylor RW, Hoyer WD (2006) The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. J. Marketing 70(4):170–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee HT, Yang S-B, Kim K (2016) Exploring the comparative salience of restaurant attributes: A conjoint analysis approach. Internat. J. Inform. Management 36(6, Part B):1360–1370.Google Scholar
  • Robier J (2016) The path towards simplicity. UX Redefined: Winning and Keeping Customers with Enhanced Usability and User Experience (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 27–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson E, Blissett J, Higgs S (2012) Changing memory of food enjoyment to increase food liking, choice and intake. British J. Nutrition 108(8):1505–1510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rolls ET (2015) Taste, olfactory, and food reward value processing in the brain. Progress Neurobiol. 127–128:64–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabatini P (2019) Yelp starts posting cleanliness scores for Pittsburgh-area restaurants. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (July 2), https://www.post-gazette.com/business/healthcare-business/2019/07/02/Yelp-cleanliness-scores-Pittsburgh-restaurants-Allegheny-County-Health-Department-HDScores/stories/201907020117.Google Scholar
  • Shanks DR (1995) The Psychology of Associative Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. McGuire C, Radner R, eds. Decision and Organization (North Holland, Amsterdam), 161–176.Google Scholar
  • Smith G (1995) Dopamine and food reward. Morrison A, Fluharty S, eds. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 83–144.Google Scholar
  • Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM (2011) Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333(6043):776–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuorila H, Cardello AV, Lesher LL (1994) Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 23(3):247–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turnwald BP, Perry MA, Jurgens D, Prabhakaran V, Jurafsky D, Markus HR, Crum AJ (2022) Language in popular American culture constructs the meaning of healthy and unhealthy eating: Narratives of craveability, excitement, and social connection in movies, television, social media, recipes, and food reviews. Appetite 172:105949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Qin MS, Luo X, Kou Y (2022) Frontiers: How support for Black Lives Matter impacts consumer responses on social media. Marketing Sci. 41(6):1029–1044.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Werle COC, Trendel O, Ardito G (2013) Unhealthy food is not tastier for everybody: The “healthy = tasty” French intuition. Food Quality Preference 28(1):116–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • WHO (2022) Food Marketing Exposure and Power and Their Associations with Food-Related Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours: A Narrative Review (World Health Organization, Geneva).Google Scholar
  • Wilson C, Nomikos GG, Collu M, Fibiger HC (1995) Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: Importance of drive. J. Neurosci. 15(7):5169–5178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeomans MR (1998) Taste, palatability, and the control of appetite. Proc. Nutrition Soc. 57(4):609–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zillow (2025) Become a premier agent partner. Retrieved March 1, https://www.zillow.com/premier-agent/.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.