Digital Approaches to Societal Grand Challenges: Toward a Broader Research Agenda on Managing Global-Local Design Tensions

References

• Aanestad M, Kankanhalli A, Maruping L, Pang MS, Ram S (2021) Digital technologies and social justice. Special issue call for papers. MIS Quarterly. Accessed January 16, 2024, https://misq.umn.edu/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/CurrentCalls/SI_DigitalTechnologies.pdf.Google Scholar
• Addo A (2022) Orchestrating a digital platform ecosystem to address societal challenges: A robust action perspective. J. Inform. Tech. 37(4):359–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Chen CX (2011) Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting Organ. Soc. 36(2):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alessa H (2022) The role of artificial intelligence in online dispute resolution: A brief and critical overview. Inform. Commun. Tech. Law 31(3):319–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrade AD, Doolin B (2016) Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees. MIS Quart. 40(2):405–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 175–205.Google Scholar
• Bashshur MR, Oc B (2015) When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. J. Management 41(5):1530–1554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Curhan JR, Moore DA, Valley KL (2000) Negotiation. Annu. Rev. Psych. 51(1):279–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boast R, Bravo M, Srinivasan R (2007) Return to Babel: Emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. Inform. Soc. 23(5):395–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland Jr RJ, Tenkasi RV, Te’Eni D (1994) Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. 5(3):456–475.Google Scholar
• Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2016) Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 41:229–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2022) Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):214–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (1984) Designing Efficient Organizations: Modelling and Experimentation (North Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Cabral S, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Potoski M (2019) Value creation and value appropriation in public and nonprofit organizations. Strategic Management J. 40(4):465–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw Hill, Boston), 151–192.Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Dahan S, Rule C (2022) Conflict analytics: When data science meets dispute resolution. Management Bus. Rev. 2(2):86–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Hill ET, De Cremer D (2023) Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in Personnel Psychology. Personnel Psych. 76(2):413–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Moor AD, Aakhus M (2006) Argumentation support: From technologies to tools. Commun. ACM 49(3):93–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Tashman P, Benischke MH (2019) Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(4):450–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellinger EW, Gregory RW, Mini T, Widjaja T, Henfridsson O (2024) Skin in the game: The transformational potential of decentralized autonomous organizations. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falcke L, Zobel AK, Comello SD (2023) How firms realign to tackle the grand challenge of climate change: An innovation ecosystems perspective. J. Product Innovation Management, ePub ahead of print June 15, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Zhang L, Wang R, Imran MA (2023) Insight into voting in DAOs: Conceptual analysis and a proposal for evaluation framework. IEEE Network, ePub ahead of print June 5, https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.137.2200561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernhaber SA, Zou H (2022) Advancing societal grand challenge research at the interface of entrepreneurship and international business: A review and research agenda. J. Bus. Venturing 37(5):106233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Fehr E (1999) Collective action as a social exchange. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 39(4):341–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Merrill RK, Schillebeeckx SJD (2021) Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 45(5):999–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Fewer TJ, Lazzarini S, McGahan A, Puranam P (2024) Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public-private collaborations. J. Management 50(1):10–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Haas MR, McGahan A, Schillebeeckx S, Tracey P (2023) Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. J. Management 49(6):1841–1869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg M, Schär F (2023) Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within decentralized autonomous organizations. J. Bus. Res. 160:113764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golding O, Yu G, Lu Q, Xu X (2022). Carboncoin: Blockchain tokenization of carbon emissions with ESG-based reputation. 2022 IEEE Internat. Conf. Blockchain Cryptocurrency ICBC (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–5.Google Scholar
• Grand Challenges Canada (2011) The Grand Challenges Approach (McLaughlinRotman Centre for Global Health, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P (2012) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, George G, Fewer T (2024) Venture Meets Mission: Aligning People, Purpose, and Profit to Innovate and Transform Society (Stanford University Press, San Francisco).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haya BK, Evans S, Brown L, Bukoski J, Butsic V, Cabiyo B, Jacobson R, et al. (2023) Comprehensive review of carbon quantification by improved forest management offset protocols. Frontiers Forests Global Change 6:958879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess C, Ostrom E (2007) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Wang C, Pavlou PA (2016) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):49–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard MC, Cogswell JE, Smith MB (2020) The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. J. Applied Psychology 105(6):577–596.Google Scholar
• Hsieh YY, Vergne JP, Anderson P, Lakhani K, Reitzig M (2018) Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations. J. Organ. Design. 7(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huvila I (2022) Making and taking information. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 73(4):528–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iandoli L, Klein M, Zollo G (2007) Can we exploit collective intelligence for collaborative deliberation? The case of the climate change collaboratorium. MIT Sloan Working Paper 4675-08, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Katsh E, Rifkin J (2001) Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Ketkar H, Workiewicz M (2022) Power to the people: The benefits and limits of employee self‐selection in organizations. Strategic Management J. 43(5):935–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketter W, Peters M, Collins J, Gupta A (2016) Competitive benchmarking: An IS approach to address wicked problems with big data and analytics. MIS Quart. 40(4):1057–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HW, Kankanhalli A, Lee SH (2018) Examining gifting through social network services: A social exchange theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):805–828.Link, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JK (2016) Invited commentary—Reflections on ICT-enabled bright society research. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):1–5.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Hong Y, Chen PY, Shao BB (2022) The screening role of design parameters for service procurement auctions in online service outsourcing platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1324–1343.Link, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Wang W, Schilke O (2021) Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations? Organ. Sci. 32(2):500–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2007) The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Acad. Management J. 50(3):644–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Markus ML, Wareham J (2016) Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quart. 40(2):267–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Lyytinen K (2021) Socio-technical affordances for large-scale collaborations: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1371–1390.Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Melville N, Watson R (2014) Spurring impactful research on information systems for environmental sustainability. MIS Quart. 37(4):1265–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Martinez JK (2020) Designing online dispute resolution. J. Dispute Resolution 135:135–149.Google Scholar
• Mirbabaie M, Bunker D, Stieglitz S, Marx J, Ehnis C (2020) Social media in times of crisis: Learning from Hurricane Harvey for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic response. J. Inform. Tech. 35(3):195–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra NN, Dixit Y, Al-Mallahi A, Bhullar MS, Upadhyay R, Martynenko A (2020) IoT, big data, and artificial intelligence in agriculture and food industry. IEEE Internet Things J. 9(9):6305–6324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitsuhashi H, Greve HR (2009) A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. 52:975–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montecchi M, Plangger K, Etter M (2019) It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Bus. Horizons 62(3):283–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray A, Kuban S, Josefy M, Anderson J (2021) Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(4):622–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalau J, Preston B, Maloney M (2015) Is adaptation a local responsibility? Environ. Sci. Policy 48:89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S (2009) Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 7(3):44–49.Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econom. Perspect. 14:137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:641–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozer GT, Greenwood BN, Gopal A (2023) Digital multisided platforms and women’s health: An empirical analysis of peer-to-peer lending and abortion rates. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):223–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Prakash S, Stewart M, Banbury C, Mazumder M, Warden P, Plancher B, Reddi VJ (2023) Is TinyML Sustainable? Commun. ACM 66(11):68–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin P, Tan W, Guo J, Shen B (2021) Intelligible description language contract (IDLC)–A novel smart contract model. Inform. Systems Frontiers, ePub ahead of print May 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10138-4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Puranam P, Warglien M (2022) Division of labor through self-selection. Organ. Sci. 33(2):810–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Reckien D, Petkova E (2019) Who is responsible for climate change adaptation? Environ. Res. Lett. 14(1):014010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Ciriello R, Peter S, Schlagwein D (2020) Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 29(6):731–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi M, Mueller-Bloch C, Thatcher JB, Beck R (2019) Blockchain research in information systems: Current trends and an inclusive future research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(9):14.Google Scholar
• Rule C (2020) Online dispute resolution and the future of justice. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 16:277–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rule C, Schmidtz AJ (2018) The New Handshake: Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of Consumer Protection (American Bar Association, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schletz M, Constant A, Hsu H, Schillebeeckx S, Beck R, Wainstein M (2023) Blockchain and regenerative finance: Charting a path toward regeneration. Frontiers Blockchain 6:1165133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Bharati P, Fridgen G, Watson RT, Albizri A, Boudreau M-C(C), Butler T, et al. (2017) The sustainability imperative in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 40(1):3.Google Scholar
• Te’eni D (1992) Analysis and design of process feedback in information systems: Old and new wine in new bottles. Accounting, Management and Inform. Technologies 2(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• Temmerman L, Veeckman C, Ballon P (2021) Collaborative governance platform for social innovation in Brussels. Soc. Enterprise J. 17:165–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay MC, Kohli R, Rivero C (2023) Data is the new protein: How Commonwealth of Virginia built digital resilience muscle and responded to opioid and COVID shocks. MIS Quart. 47:423–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T, Blader S (2013) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valdovinos JI (2022) Transparency and Critical Theory: The Becoming-Transparent of Ideology (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watanabe M, Rule C (2022) ODR in the metaverse. Internat. J. Online Dispute Resolution 9(1):29–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SJ, Butler BS (2011) Creating bigger problems: Grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. J. Inform. Tech. 26(2):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WRI (2022) COP 27: Key takeaways and what’s next. World Resources Institute. Accessed September 3, 2023, https://www.wri.org/insights/cop27-key-outcomes-un-climate-talks-sharm-el-sheikh.Google Scholar
• Wright AJ (2021) The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations: Opportunities and challenges. Accessed January 17, 2024, https://assets.pubpub.org/aakel7dc/31625249313227.pdf.Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Venkataraman N (1995) Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management J. 16:373–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Ai P, Lai F, Luo X, Benitez J (2022) Task management in decentralized autonomous organization. J. Oper. Management 68(6–7):649–674.Google Scholar