1 + 1 > 2? Information, Humans, and Machines

References

• Alibaba Cloud (2018) 6 fields where artificial intelligence are surpassing human. Accessed January 30, 2024, https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/6-fields-where-artificial-intelligence-are-surpassing-human_584189.Google Scholar
• Allen R, Choudhury P (2022) Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: The countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ. Sci. 33(1):149–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Amit A, Sagiv L (2013) The role of epistemic motivation in individuals’ response to decision complexity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):104–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) How technology wrecks the middle class. New York Times 24(2013):1279–1333.Google Scholar
• Bauer K, von Zahn M, Hinz O (2023) Expl(AI)ned: The impact of explainable artificial intelligence on users’ information processing. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1582–1602.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1995) The power of inertia. Qualitative Sociol. 18(3):301–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenstock J, Cadamuro G, On R (2015) Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata. Science 350(6264):1073–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bråten I, Samuelstuen MS (2007) Measuring strategic processing: Comparing task-specific self-reports to traces. Metacognition Learn. 2(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6370):1530–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein JA, Jarvis WBG (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psych. Bull. 119(2):197–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2019) Artificial intelligence and behavioral economics. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 587–608.Google Scholar
• Cao S, Jiang W, Wang JL, Yang B (2021) From man vs. machine to man + machine: The art and AI of stock analyses. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1967) Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J. Abnormal Psych. 72(3):193–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Li X, Lai F (2017) Gender discrimination in online peer-to-peer credit lending: Evidence from a lending platform in China. Electronic Commerce Res. 17(4):553–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen V, Liao QV, Vaughan JW, Bansal G (2023) Understanding the role of human intuition on reliance in human-AI decision-making with explanations. Preprint, submitted January 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07255.Google Scholar
• Chernev A (2003) When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 30(2):170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Starr E, Agarwal R (2020) Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1381–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Commerford BP, Dennis SA, Joe JR, Ulla JW (2022) Man vs. machine: Complex estimates and auditor reliance on artificial intelligence. J. Accounting Res. 60(1):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Marcolin B, Kelley H, Higgins C (2012) Research commentary—Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1093–1109.Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport T, Guha A, Grewal D, Bressgott T (2020) How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(1):24–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Gurkan H (2023) Is your machine better than you? You may never know. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 25, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4791.Link, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1):85–104.Google Scholar
• Evans JSBT (2003) In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(10):454–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feuerriegel S, Shrestha YR, von Krogh G, Zhang C (2022) Bringing artificial intelligence to business management. Nature Machine Intelligence 4(7):611–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu R, Huang Y, Singh PV (2021) Crowds, lending, machine, and bias. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):72–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2021) Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3b):1527–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Fuster A, Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Ramadorai T, Walther A (2022) Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. J. Finance 77(1):5–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Zheng Z, Tian X, Li L (2021) Human–robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Germann M, Merkle C (2022) Algorithm aversion in financial investing. Preprint, submitted November 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3364850.Google Scholar
• Gonzalez L, Loureiro YK (2014) When can a photo increase credit? The impact of lender and borrower profiles on online peer-to-peer loans. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 2:44–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C (2000) Clinical vs. mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psych. Assessment 12(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Wang W (2015) An active learning-based SVM multi-class classification model. Pattern Recognition 48(5):1577–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Y, Xu X, Huang N, Hong Y, Liu D (2021) Enhancing user privacy through ephemeral sharing design: Experimental evidence from online dating. Preprint, submitted January 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740782.Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E (1987) Information and reasoning in intelligent decision support systems. Internat. J. Man Machine Stud. 27(5–6):665–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu X, Huang Y, Li B, Lu T (2022) Uncovering the source of machine bias. Preprint, submitted January 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03092.Google Scholar
• Hvalshagen M, Lukyanenko R, Samuel BM (2023) Empowering users with narratives: Examining the efficacy of narratives for understanding data-oriented conceptual models. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):890–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Kim S-H, Tong J (2021) Eliciting human judgment for prediction algorithms. Management Sci. 67(4):2314–2325.Link, Google Scholar
• Icard TF (2018) Bayes, bounds, and rational analysis. Philos. Sci. 85(1):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs M, Pradier MF, McCoy TH, Perlis RH, Doshi-Velez F, Gajos KZ (2021) How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: The example of antidepressant selection. Translational Psychiatry 11(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacovi A, Marasović A, Miller T, Goldberg Y (2021) Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in AI. Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 624–635.Google Scholar
• Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, Gawlitza J (2021) Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):713–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Keil M, Tan BCY, Wei KK, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V, Wassenaar A (2000) A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(2):299–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna S, Han T, Gu A, Pombra J, Jabbari S, Wu S, Lakkaraju H (2022) The disagreement problem in explainable machine learning: A practitioner’s perspective. Preprint, submitted February 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01602.Google Scholar
• Kunimoto C, Miller J, Pashler H (2001) Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness Cognition 10(3):294–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Huneke ME, Jasper JD (2000) Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2016) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 22(4):773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu M, Tang X, Xia S, Zhang S, Zhu Y, Meng Q (2023) Algorithm aversion: Evidence from ridesharing drivers. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02475.Google Scholar
• Lou B, Wu L (2021) AI on drugs: Can artificial intelligence accelerate drug development? Evidence from a large-scale examination of bio-pharma firms. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3):1451–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loutfi E (2019) What Does the Future Hold for AI-Enabled Coaching (Chief Learning Officer, New York).Google Scholar
• Lu SF, Rui H, Seidmann A (2018) Does technology substitute for nurses? Staffing decisions in nursing homes. Management Sci. 64(4):1842–1859.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Zhang Y, Li B (2023a) Profit vs. equality? The case of financial risk assessment and a new perspective on alternative data. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 47(4):1517–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu X, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Shen L (2023b) At the cost of active thinking: Investigating the role of presentation explicitness in human-AI collaboration. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4547893.Google Scholar
• Lu J, Lee D, Kim TW, Danks D (2020) Good explanation for algorithmic transparency. Preprint, submitted January 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3503603.Google Scholar
• Luo X, Qin MS, Fang Z, Qu Z (2021) Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and solutions. J. Marketing 85(2):14–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Mantel SP, Kardes FR (1999) The role of direction of comparison, attribute-based processing, and attitude-based processing in consumer preference. J. Consumer Res. 25(4):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcotte DE (1998) The wage premium for job seniority during the 1980s and early 1990s. Indust. Relations 37(4):419–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohseni S, Yang F, Pentyala S, Du M, Liu Y, Lupfer N, Hu X, Ji S, Ragan E (2021) Machine learning explanations to prevent overtrust in fake news detection. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media, vol. 15 (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 421–431.Google Scholar
• Oskamp S (1965) Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J. Consulting Psych. 29(3):261–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peukert C, Sen A, Claussen J (2023) The editor and the algorithm: Recommendation technology in online news. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4954.Link, Google Scholar
• Proctor A, Bonbright D (2021) Constituent voice: Feedback loops, relationships and continual improvement in complex system change. Generation Impact: International Perspectives on Impact Accounting (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 53–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A (2020) Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(1):137–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1988) Introduction to the Shapley value. The Shapley Value (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–27.Google Scholar
• Rudin C (2019) Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(5):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer J (1966) Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psych. Bull. 66(3):178–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt P, Biessmann F, Teubner T (2020) Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. J. Decision Systems 29(4):260–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sellier AL, Scopelliti I, Morewedge CK (2019) Debiasing training improves decision making in the field. Psych. Sci. 30(9):1371–1379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siau K, Wang W (2018) Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter Bus. Tech. J. 31(2):47–53.Google Scholar
• Smerek RE (2014) Why people think deeply: Meta-cognitive cues, task characteristics and thinking dispositions. Handbook of Research Methods on Intuition (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song QC, Tang C, Wee S (2021) Making sense of model generalizability: A tutorial on cross-validation in R and shiny. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 4(1).Google Scholar
• Speier C (2006) The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 64(11):1115–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Taylor SJ (2020) Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment. Quant. Marketing Econom. 18:237–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang DJ, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Tao Q, Dong Y, Lin Z (2017) Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform. Inform. Systems Frontiers 19(3):425–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Te’eni D, Yahav I, Zagalsky A, Schwartz D, Silverman G, Cohen D, Mann Y, Lewinsky D (2023) Reciprocal human-machine learning: A theory and an instantiation for the case of message classification. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03518.Link, Google Scholar
• Teodorescu MHM, Morse L, Awwad Y, Kane GC (2021) Failures of fairness in automation require a deeper understanding of human-ML augmentation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3):1483–1500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tong S, Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z (2021) The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment vs. disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1600–1631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Schalk J, Beersma B, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2010) The more (complex), the better? The influence of epistemic motivation on integrative bargaining in complex negotiation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 40(2):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I (2016) Empirical assessment of alternative designs for enhancing different types of trusting beliefs in online recommendation agents. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):744–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2023b) Friend or foe? Teaming between artificial intelligence and workers with variation in experience. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.00588.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Yang M, Sun T (2023c) Human-AI co-creation in product ideation: The dual view of quality and diversity. Preprint, submitted December 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4668241.Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu X, Zhang X, Hong Y (2023d) Knowledge trap: Human experts distracted by details when teaming with AI. Preprint, submitted April 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4395858.Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang W, Zhao X, Wang J (2019) Soft information in online peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from a leading platform in China. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 36:100873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, He Y, Huang N, De Liu XG, Chen G (2023a) The role of AI assistants in livestream selling: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Preprint, submitted February 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4365103.Google Scholar
• Weiss JA (1982) Coping with complexity: An experimental study of public policy decision-making. J. Policy Anal. Management 2(1):66–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Sun T, Luo L, Golden J (2024) Consumer and AI co-creation: When and why nudging human participation improves AI creation. USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Sponsored by iORB, No. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wang C, Ren F, Chen G (2021) Inferring multi-stage risk for online consumer credit services: An integrated scheme using data augmentation and model enhancement. Decision Support Systems 149:113611.Crossref, Google Scholar