Sparking Innovation: The Effect of Inventor Gender Diversity on Recombinant Innovation

References

• Abbasi A, Sarker S, Chiang RH (2016) Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(2):3.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Morris Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Galletta DF, Carley KM (2003) Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. 49(1):21–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M, Sampat B (2009) Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy 38(2):415–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• An H, Chen CR, Wu Q, Zhang T (2021) Corporate innovation: Do diverse boards help? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 56(1):155–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios LA (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J (2019) Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 134(2):647–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Ferreira MA, Matos P, Pires P (2017) Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. J. Financial Econom. 126(1):122–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Cabral L, Hegde D, Peeters T (2021) Are inventors or firms the engines of innovation? Management Sci. 67(6):3899–3920.Link, Google Scholar
• Bostwick VK, Weinberg BA (2022) Nevertheless she persisted? Gender peer effects in doctoral STEM programs. J. Labor Econom. 40(2):397–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cady SH, Valentine J (1999) Team innovation and perceptions of consideration: What difference does diversity make? Small Group Res. 30(6):730–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cahill L (2006) Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7(6):477–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox TH, Blake S (1991) Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Acad. Management Perspect. 5(3):45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley D, Cropley A (2017) Innovation capacity, organisational culture and gender. Eur. J. Innovation Management 20(3):493–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313(5787):665–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Díaz-García C, González-Moreno A, Sáez-Martínez FJ (2013) Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation 15(2):149–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JQ, Yang CH (2019) Information technology and innovation outcomes: Is knowledge recombination the missing link? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(6):612–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faems D, Subramanian AM (2013) R&D manpower and technological performance: The impact of demographic and task-related diversity. Res. Policy 42(9):1624–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández J (2015) The impact of gender diversity in foreign subsidiaries’ innovation outputs. Internat. J. Gender Entrepreneurship 7(2):148–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Moreno A, Díaz-García C, Sáez-Martínez FJ (2018) R&D team composition and product innovation: Gender diversity makes a difference. Eur. J. Internat. Management 12(4):423–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin D, Li K, Xu T (2021) Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 56(1):123–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1998) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 287–343.Google Scholar
• Halkos GE, Kitsos C (2012) Relative risk and innovation activities: The case of Greece. Innovation 14(1):156–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Halpern DF (2011) Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities (Psychology Press, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
• Han L, Tian Z, Wojan TR, Goetz SJ (2024) Testing biasedness of self-reported microbusiness innovation in the annual business survey. PLoS One 19(1):e0296667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu PH, Dongmei L (2018) Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(7):2553–2605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J (2016) Why do women leave science and engineering? ILR Rev. 69(1):199–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Garant JP, Herman H, Munroe DJ (2013) Why are women underrepresented amongst patentees? Res. Policy 42(4):831–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Baroudi JJ (1995) The impact of job performance evaluations on career advancement prospects: An examination of gender differences in the IS workplace. MIS Quart. 19(1):107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph D, Ang S, Slaughter SA (2015) Turnover or turnaway? Competing risks analysis of male and female IT professionals’ job mobility and relative pay gap. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):145–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2013) Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector. Res. Policy 42(8):1457–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer N, Gopal RD, Bapna R (2020) Onward and upward? An empirical investigation of gender and promotions in information technology services. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):383–398.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerback J, Hanson B, Wooden P (2020) Association between author diversity and acceptance rates and citations in peer-reviewed earth science manuscripts. Earth Space Sci. 7(5):e2019EA000946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Amy ZY, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D (1991) Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing strategies. J. Consumer Res. 18(1):63–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Preprint, submitted September 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
• Nielsen MW, Alegria S, Börjeson L, Etzkowitz H, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Joshi A, Leahey E, Smith-Doerr L, Woolley AW, Schiebinger L (2017) Gender diversity leads to better science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(8):1740–1742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan B, Fang X, Sahoo N, Burton-Jones A (2022) Editor’s comments: Machine learning in information systems research. MIS Quart. 46(1):iii–xix.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page SE (2017) The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Awate S (2017) Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra-organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 38(3):657–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richard OC (2000) Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. 43(2):164–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Jiménez JM, Fuentes-Fuentes MdM, Ruiz-Arroyo M (2016) Knowledge combination capability and innovation: The effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. J. Bus. Ethics 135(3):503–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation. MIS Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Sahaym A, Mithas S, Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Lee HH (2020) Turning liabilities of global operations into assets: IT-enabled social integration capacity and exploratory innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):361–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Fleming L (2004) Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy 33(10):1615–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strumsky D, Lobo J (2015) Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention. Res. Policy 44(8):1445–1461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Teruel M, Segarra-Blasco A (2022) Gender, occupational diversity of R&D teams and patents generation: An application to Spanish firms. R&D Management 52(3):517–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torchia M, Calabrò A, Huse M (2011) Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. J. Bus. Ethics 102:299–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC (2010) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. Research Colloquium on Social Identity of the European Laboratory of Social Psychology, Dec, 1978, Université de Haute Bretagne, Rennes, France (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), 15–40.Google Scholar
• Whalen R (2018) Boundary spanning innovation and the patent system: Interdisciplinary challenges for a specialized examination system. Res. Policy 47(7):1334–1343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie L, Zhou J, Zong Q, Lu Q (2020) Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Res. Policy 49(1):103885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Quart. 36(2):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Konrad AM (2011) Diversity and organizational innovation: The role of employee involvement. J. Organ. Behav. 32(8):1062–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Tian TY, Woodruff TK, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2022) Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(36):e2200841119.Crossref, Google Scholar