A General-Purpose IT Intervention to Improve Human Decision Making, Strengthen Passwords, and Reduce Receptivity to Misinformation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0372

References

  • Addas S, Pinsonneault A (2015) The many faces of information technology interruptions: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects. Inform. Systems J. 25(3):231–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM, Epley N, Eyre RN (2007) Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. J. Experiment. Psych. General 136(4):569–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber RE, Lucas HC (1983) System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction. Comm. ACM 26(11):972–986.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Software 67(1):1–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW (1994) Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50(1–3):7–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blacker KJ, Negoita S, Ewen JB, Courtney SM (2017) N-back versus complex span working memory training. J. Cognitive Enhancement 1(4):434–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne GJ, Walden EA (2020) Is there a genetic basis for information search propensity? A genotyping experiment. MIS Quart. 44(2):747–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne GJ, Walden EA (2021) Stopping information search: An fMRI investigation. Decision Support Systems 143:113498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler TW (1983) Computer response time and user performance. Janda A, ed. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM Press, Boston), 58–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen A, Karahanna E (2018) Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quart. 42(4):1023–1042.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dabholkar PA, Sheng X (2008) Perceptions of download delays: Relation to actual waits, web site abandoning, and stage of delay. Service Indust. J. 28(10):1415–1429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dannenbring GL (1983) The effect of computer response time on user performance and satisfaction: A preliminary investigation. Behav. Res. Methods Instrumentation 15(2):213–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GB (1982) Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems J. 21(1):4–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis ES, Hantula DA (2001) The effects of download delay on performance and end-user satisfaction in an Internet tutorial. Comput. Human Behav. 17(3):249–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deese J, Hulse SH (1967) The Psychology of Learning, 3rd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dellaert BGC, Kahn BE (1999) How tolerable is delay? Consumers’ evaluations of internet web sites after waiting. J. Interactive Marketing 13(1):41–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis AR, Taylor NJ (2006) Information foraging on the web: The effects of “acceptable” internet delays on multi-page information search behavior. Decision Support Systems 42(2):810–824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annual Rev. Psych. 64(1):135–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiClemente DF, Hantula DA (2003) Optimal foraging online: Increasing sensitivity to delay. Psych. Marketing 20(9):785–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dinev T, McConnell AR, Smith HJ (2015) Research commentary—Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):639–655.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Evans J, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gajewski PD, Hanisch E, Falkenstein M, Thönes S, Wascher E (2018) What does the n-back task measure as we get older? Relations between working-memory measures and other cognitive functions across the lifespan. Frontiers Psych. 9:2208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galletta DF, Henry R, McCoy S, Polak P (2004) Web site delays: How tolerant are users? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(1):1–28.Google Scholar
  • Galletta DF, Henry RM, McCoy S, Polak P (2006) When the wait isn’t so bad: The interacting effects of website delay, familiarity, and breadth. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):20–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gligorić V, Feddes A, Doosje B (2022) Political bullshit receptivity and its correlates: A cross-country validation of the concept. J. Soc. Political Psych. 10(2):411–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RL, Brown RG, Owen AM, Bullmore ET, Howard RJ (2006) Task-induced deactivations during successful paired associates learning: An effect of age but not Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 31(2):818–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RL, Brown RG, Owen AM, Ffytche DH, Howard RJ (2003) FMRI BOLD response to increasing task difficulty during successful paired associates learning. NeuroImage 20(2):1006–1019.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guidetti OA, Speelman C, Bouhlas P (2023) A review of cyber vigilance tasks for network defense. Frontiers Neuroergonomics 4:1104873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harmon KA, Lee H, Khasraghi BJ, Parmar HS, Walden EA (2024) Delays in information presentation lead to brain state switching, which degrades user performance, and there may not be much we can do about it. MIS Quart. 48(1):273–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helton WS (2009) Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. J. Clinical Experiment. Neuropsychology 31(1):39–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helton WS, Kern RP, Walker DR (2009) Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task. Consciousness Cognition 18(3):600–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helton WS, Hollander TD, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN, Wallaart M, Beauchamp G, Parasuraman R, Hancock PA (2005) Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. British J. Psych. 96(2):249–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong W, Hess TJ, Hardin A (2013) When filling the wait makes it feel longer: A paradigm shift perspective for managing online delay. MIS Quart. 37(2):383–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoxmeier JA, DiCesare C (2000) System response time and user satisfaction: An experimental study of browser-based applications. Proc. Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Long Beach, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hugdahl K, Kazimierczak K, Beresniewicz J, Kompus K, Westerhausen R, Ersland L, Grüner R, Specht K (2019) Dynamic up- and down-regulation of the default (DMN) and extrinsic (EMN) mode networks during alternating task-on and task-off periods. PLoS One 14(9):e0218358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ, Meier B (2010) The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory 18(4):394–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones HS, Towse JN, Race N, Harrison T (2019). Email fraud: The search for psychological predictors of susceptibility. PLoS One 14(1):e0209684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 49–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khern-am-nuai W, Hashim MJ, Pinsonneault A, Yang W, Li N (2023) Augmenting password strength meter design using the elaboration likelihood model: Evidence from randomized experiments. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):157–177.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lau-Zhu A, Holmes EA, Butterfield S, Holmes J (2017) Selective association between Tetris game play and visuospatial working memory: A preliminary investigation. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 31(4):438–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y, Chen ANK, Ilie V (2012) Can online wait be managed? The effect of filler interfaces and presentation modes on perceived waiting time online. MIS Quart. 36(2):365–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Y, Suh A (2021) The role of spatial ability in learning with virtual reality: A literature review. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 94–103.Google Scholar
  • Ma X, Kim SH, Kim SS (2014) Online gambling behavior: The impacts of cumulative outcomes, recent outcomes, and prior use. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):511–527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller RB (1968) Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. Proc. December 9–11, 1968, Fall Joint Comput. Conf. Part I (ACM Press, San Francisco), 267–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukerji N (2018) What is fake news? Ergo 5(35).Google Scholar
  • Mullins JK, Sabherwal R (2022) Just enough information? The contingent curvilinear effect of information volume on decision performance in IS-enabled teams. MIS Quart. 46(4):2197–2228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nah FFH (2004) A study on tolerable waiting time: How long are web users willing to wait? Behaviour Inform. Tech. 23(3):153–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Todd PA, Wixom BH (2005) Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(4):199–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J (1999) User interface directions for the web. Comm. ACM 42(1):65–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nilsson A, Erlandsson A, Västfjäll D (2019) The complex relation between receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit and political ideology. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 45(10):1440–1454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer JW (2002) Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Inform. Systems Res. 13(2):151–167.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parrish S (2019) Gates’ law: How progress compounds and why it matters. Farnam Street. Accessed February 6, 2025, https://fs.blog/gates-law/.Google Scholar
  • Parsons TD, Courtney CG, Dawson ME, Rizzo AA, Arizmendi BJ (2013) Visuospatial processing and learning effects in virtual reality based mental rotation and navigational tasks. Harris D, ed. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Understanding Human Cognition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 75–83.Google Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Rand DG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Rand DG (2020) Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. J. Personality 88(2):185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Barr N, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA (2015) On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment Decision Making 10(6):549–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Barr N, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA (2016) It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016). Judgment Decision Making 11(1):123–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J (1997) Oops!: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35(6):747–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose GM, Meuter ML, Curran JM (2005) On-line waiting: The role of download time and other important predictors on attitude toward e-retailers. Psych. Marketing 22(2):127–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross PE (2003) 5 commandments [technology laws and rules of thumb]. IEEE Spectrum 40(12):30–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubia K, Russell T, Overmeyer S, Brammer MJ, Bullmore ET, Sharma T, Simmons A, et al. (2001) Mapping motor inhibition: Conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. NeuroImage 13(2):250–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salvi C, Iannello P, Cancer A, McClay M, Rago S, Dunsmoor JE, Antonietti A (2021) Going viral: How fear, socio-cognitive polarization and problem-solving influence fake news detection and proliferation during COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers Comm. 5:562588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selvidge PR, Chaparro BS, Bender GT (2002) The world wide wait: Effects of delays on user performance. Internat. J. Indust. Ergonomics 29(1):15–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaft T, Wang D, Zhu L (2018) Maybe waiting is bad: A replication investigating website delay, familiarity, and breadth. AIS Trans. Replication Res. 4(6):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmonds DJ, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH (2008) Meta-analysis of go/no-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 46(1):224–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral Brain Sci. 23(5):645–726.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoet G (2010) PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav. Res. Methods 42(4):1096–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoet G (2017) PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching Psych. 44(1):24–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan Y, Davis F, Koh C (2022) Executive functions and information systems learning. MIS Quart. 46(2):813–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tams S, Thatcher JB, Grover V (2018) Concentration, competence, confidence, and capture: An experimental study of age, interruption-based technostress, and task performance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(9):857–908.Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2021) Nudge: The Final Edition (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR, Balz JP (2013) Choice architecture. Shafir E, ed. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 428–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thatcher JB, Wright RT, Sun H, Zagenczyk TJ, Klein R (2018) Mindfulness in information technology use: Definitions, distinctions, and a new measure. MIS Quart. 42(3):831–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P, Benbasat I (1992) The use of information in decision making: An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids. MIS Quart. 16(3):373–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toreini P, Langner M (2019) Designing user-adaptive information dashboards: Considering limited attention and working memory. Proc. 27th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS Electronic Library, Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden).Google Scholar
  • Trés ES, Brucki SMD (2014) Visuospatial processing: A review from basic to current concepts. Dementia Neuropsychologia 8(2):175–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O, Qahri-Saremi H (2016) Problematic use of social networking sites: Antecedents and consequence from a dual-system theory perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1087–1116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Anderson B, Kirwan CB, Eargle D (2014) Using measures of risk perception to predict information security behavior: Insights from electroencephalography (EEG). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(10):679–722.Google Scholar
  • Vance A, Eargle D, Eggett D, Straub D, Ouimet K (2022) Do security fear appeals work when they interrupt tasks? A multi-method examination of password strength. MIS Quart. 45(3):1721–1738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wirth N (1995) A plea for lean software. Computer 28(2):64–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf D (2021) zxcvbn-python (Version 4.4.20) [Python package]. GitHub repository. https://github.com/dwolfhub/zxcvbn-python.Google Scholar
  • Woodman GF, Luck SJ (2004) Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 11(2):269–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu JH, Wang YM (2006) Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Inform. Management 43(6):728–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou R, Shao S, Li W, Zhou L (2016) How to define the user’s tolerance of response time in using mobile applications. 2016 IEEE Internat. Conf. Indust. Engrg. Engrg. Management (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 281–285.Google Scholar
  • Zona Research (1999) The Economic Impacts of Unacceptable Web Site Download Speeds (Zona Research, Inc.).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.