AI Governance and the Decentralization of Technology Production: An Investigation of AI-Based IPA Bots

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0588

References

  • Agar M (1986) Speaking of Ethnography (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Applegate LM, Konsynski BR, Nunamaker JF (1986) Model management systems: Design for decision support. Decision Support Systems 2(1):81–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baird A, Maruping LM (2021) The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Quart. 45(1):315–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berente N, Seidel S, Safadi H (2019) Research commentary—Data-driven computationally intensive theory development. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):50–64.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berente N, Gu B, Recker J, Santhanam R (2021) Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quart. 45(3):1433–1450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boland R (1991) Information systems use as a hermeneutic process. Nissen H-E, Klein HK, Hirschheim R, eds. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam), 439–458.Google Scholar
  • Brown CV (1997) Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Inform. Systems Res. 8(1):69–94.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Butler BS, Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quart. 30(2):211–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camargo M, Dumas M, González-Rojas O (2020) Automated discovery of business process simulation models from event logs. Decision Support Systems 134:113284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee D, Ravichandran T (2013) Governance of interorganizational information systems: A resource dependence perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):261–278.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Hsieh JP-A, Rai A (2022) How does intelligent system knowledge empowerment yield payoffs? Uncovering the adaptation mechanisms and contingency role of work experience. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):1042–1071.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Constantinides P, Barrett M (2015) Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):40–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crosina E, Pratt MG (2019) Toward a model of organizational mourning: The case of former Lehman Brothers bankers. Acad. Management J. 62(1):66–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunha J, Carugati A (2018) Transfiguration work and the system of transfiguration how employees represent and misrepresent their work. MIS Quart. 42(3):873–894.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Kirby J (2015) Beyond automation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(6):58–65.Google Scholar
  • Deng Y, Zheng J, Huang L, Kannan K (2023) Let artificial intelligence be your shelf watchdog: The impact of intelligent image processing-powered shelf monitoring on product sales. MIS Quart. 47(3):1045–1072.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G (1989) A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Sci. 35(10):1151–1171.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drnevich PL, Croson DC (2013) Information technology and business-level strategy: Toward an integrated theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 37(2):483–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elofson GS, Konsynski BR (1993) Performing organizational learning with machine apprentices. Decision Support Systems 10(2):109–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elshan E, Ebel P, Söllner M, Leimeister JM (2023) Leveraging low code development of smart personal assistants: An integrated design approach with the SPADE method. J. Management Inform. Systems 40(1):96–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehrer T, Fischer DA, Leemans SJJ, Röglinger M, Wynn MT (2022) An assisted approach to business process redesign. Decision Support Systems 156:113749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford M (2015) Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gadamer H-G (1975) Hermeneutics and social science. Cultur. Hermen. 2(4):307–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1995) Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gnewuch U, Morana S, Hinz O, Kellner R, Maedche A (2023) More than a bot? The impact of disclosing human involvement on customer interactions with hybrid service agents. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):936–955.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregory RW, Kaganer E, Henfridsson O, Ruch TJ (2018) IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quart. 42(4):1225–1229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haag S, Eckhardt A (2024) Dealing effectively with shadow IT by managing both cybersecurity and user needs. MIS Quart. Executive 23(4):5.Google Scholar
  • Haag S, Eckhardt A, Schwarz A (2019) The acceptance of justifications among shadow IT users and nonusers – An empirical analysis. Inform. Management 56(5):731–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1):10–18.Google Scholar
  • Hevner A, Storey V (2023) Research challenges for the design of human-artificial intelligence systems (HAIS). ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 14(1):Article 10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland JH, Holyoak K, Nisbett R, Thagard P (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrahi MH (2018) Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Bus. Horizons 61(4):577–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karhade P, Kathuria A (2020) Missing impact of ratings on platform participation in India: A call for research in GREAT domains. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 47(1):19.Google Scholar
  • Karhade P, Shaw MJ, Subramanyam R (2015) Patterns in information systems portfolio prioritization. MIS Quart. 39(2):413–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kathuria A, Karhade PP, Konsynski BR (2020) In the realm of hungry ghosts: Multi-level theory for supplier participation on digital platforms. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(2):396–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil M, Beranek PM, Konsynski BR (1995) Usefulness and ease of use: Field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems 13(1):75–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim B, Park J, Suh J (2020) Transparency and accountability in AI decision support: Explaining and visualizing convolutional neural networks for text information. Decision Support Systems 134:113302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King JL (1983) Centralized versus decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. ACM Comput. Surveys 15(4):319–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch LJ, Cummings LL (1996) Contextual influences on self-control of IS professionals engaged in systems development. Accounting Management Inform. Technologies 6(3):191–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konsynski B, Sprague RH (1986) Future research directions in model management. Decision Support Systems 2(1):103–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konsynski BR, Kathuria A, Karhade PP (2024) Cognitive reapportionment and the art of letting go: A theoretical framework for the allocation of decision rights. J. Management Inform. Systems 41(2):328–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity MC, Willcocks LP (2021) Becoming strategic with intelligent automation. MIS Quart. Executive 20(2):7.Google Scholar
  • Lacity M, Willcocks L, Gozman D (2021) Influencing information systems practice: The action principles approach applied to robotic process and cognitive automation. J. Inform. Tech. 36(3):216–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3):1501–1525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeFave R, Branch B, Brown CV, Wixom B (2008) How Sprint Nextel reconfigured IT resources for results. MIS Quart. Executive 7(4):171–179.Google Scholar
  • Leidner DE, Gregory RW (2024) About theory and theorizing. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 25(3):501–521.Google Scholar
  • Liang T-P, Konsynski BR (1993) Modeling by analogy: Use of analogical reasoning in model management systems. Decision Support Systems 9(1):113–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindberg A (2020) Developing theory through integrating human and machine pattern recognition. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(1):7.Google Scholar
  • Louis MR, Bartunek JM (1992) Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. J. Management Inquiry 1(2):101–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mähring M, Keil M (2008) Information technology project escalation: A process model. Decision Sciences 39(2):239–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (CSUR) 26(1):87–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone TW, Crowston K, Herman GA (2003) Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Maruping LM, Agarwal R (2004) Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):975–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Midha V, Bhattacherjee A (2012) Governance practices and software maintenance: A study of open source projects. Decision Support Systems 54(1):23–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miranda S, Berente N, Seidel S, Safadi H, Burton-Jones A (2022) Editor’s comments: Computationally intensive theory construction: A primer for authors and reviewers. MIS Quart. 46(2):iii–xviii.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S, Kohli R (2022) How to manage technical debt and shadow IT to synchronize digital strategy. Management Bus. Rev. 2(4):27–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Negoita B, Lapointe L, Rivard S (2018) Collective information systems use: A typological theory. MIS Quart. 42(4):1281–1301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunamaker J, Vogel D, Konsynski B (1989) Interaction of task and technology to support large groups. Decision Support Systems 5(2):139–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen MH, Chervany NL (1980) The relationship between organisational characteristics and the structure of the Information Services function. MIS Quart. 4(2):57–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Queiroz M, Anand A, Baird A (2024) Manager appraisal of artificial intelligence investments. J. Management Inform. Systems 41(3):682–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Machine Learn. 1:81–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinlan JR (1990) Decision trees and decision-making. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 20(2):339–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Constantinides P, Sarker S (2019) Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quart. 43(1):iii–iix.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. 33(3):617–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sætre AS, Van de Ven A (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):684–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahay S, Monteiro E, Aanestad M (2009) Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):4.Google Scholar
  • Sahaym A, Vithayathil J, Sarker S, Sarker S, Bjørn-Andersen N (2023) Value destruction in information technology ecosystems: A mixed-method investigation with interpretive case study and analytical modeling. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):508–531.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salge TO, Kohli R, Barrett M (2015) Investing in Information Systems. MIS Quart. 39(1):61–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V, Zmud RW (1999) Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. 23(2):261–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X, Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–6A5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders C, Benlian A, Henfridsson O, Wiener M (2020) IS control & governance. Bush A, Rai A, eds. MIS Quarterly Research Curations. http://misq.org/research-curations.Google Scholar
  • Segars AH, Grover V (1999) Profiles of strategic information systems planning. Inform. Systems Res. 10(3):199–232.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Storey VC, Hevner AR, Yoon VY (2024) The design of human-artificial intelligence systems in decision sciences: A look back and directions forward. Decision Support Systems 182:114230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susarla A, Subramanyam R, Karhade P (2010) Contractual provisions to mitigate holdup: Evidence from information technology outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):37–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. 30(1):57–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2008) Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management J. 29(7):769–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2009) Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):180–197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Kim SK (2015) Discriminating IT governance. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):656–674.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B (2010) Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):288–304.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tremblay MC, Kohli R, Rivero C (2023) Data is the new protein: How the Commonwealth of Virginia built digital resilience muscle and rebounded from opioid and COVID shocks. MIS Quart. 47(1):423–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Giffen B, Ludwig H (2023) How Siemens democratized artificial intelligence. MIS Quart. Executive 22(1):Article 3.Google Scholar
  • Viljoen A, Stelzl B, Yang M, Nguyen J, Hein A, Elshan E, Krcmar H (2026) Navigating flexibility and standardisation in low-code/no-code development. Inform. Systems J. 36(1):95–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vom Brocke J, Baier M-S, Schmiedel T, Stelzl K, Röglinger M, Wehking C (2021) Context-aware business process management. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 63(5):533–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):385–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P, Ross JW (2004) IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Wiener M, Mähring M, Remus U, Saunders C (2016) Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects. MIS Quart. 40(3):741–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams CK, Karahanna E (2013) Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. MIS Quart. 37(3):933–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR (2018) Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(4):114–123.Google Scholar
  • Windeler JB, Maruping L, Venkatesh V (2017) Technical systems development risk factors: The role of empowering leadership in lowering developers’ stress. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):775–796.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Chan FTS, Yan C, Bose I (2022) Towards risk-aware artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: An overview. Decision Support Systems 159:113800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhdanov D, Bhattacharjee S, Bragin MA (2022) Incorporating FAT and privacy aware AI modeling approaches into business decision making frameworks. Decision Support Systems 155:113715.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.