Understanding Information Privacy Concerns: A Meta-Analytic of Three Decades of Research

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0797

References

  • Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adjerid I, Peer E, Acquisti A (2018) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective versus relative risk in privacy decision making. MIS Quart. 42(2):465–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agag GM, Khashan MA, Colmekcioglu N, Almamy A, Alharbi NS, Eid R, Shabbir H, Abdelmoety ZHS (2020) Converting hotels website visitors into buyers: How online hotel web assurance seals services decrease consumers’ concerns and increase online booking intentions. Inform. Tech. People 33(1):129–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alashoor T, Keil M, Smith J, McConnell AR (2023) Too tired and in too good of a mood to worry about privacy: Explaining the privacy paradox through the lens of effort level in information processing. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1415–1436.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M, Joachimsthaler EA (1992) Revisiting DSS implementation research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quart. 16(1):95–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alhouti S, Johnson CM, D’Souza G (2016) The complex web of values: The impact on online privacy concerns and purchase behavior. J. Electronic Commerce Res. 17(1):22–35.Google Scholar
  • Anderson CL, Agarwal R (2011) The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):469–490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bala H, Bhagwatwar A (2018) Employee dispositions to job and organization as antecedents and consequences of information systems use. Inform. Systems J. 28(4):650–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal G, Zahedi FM, Gefen D (2010) The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems 49(2):138–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baruh L, Secinti E, Cemalcilar Z (2017) Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. J. Comm. 67(1):26–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(4):1017–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bélanger F, James TL (2020) A theory of multilevel information privacy management for the digital era. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):510–536.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I, Barki H (2007) Quo vadis TAM? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(4):211–218.Google Scholar
  • Bhave DP, Teo LH, Dalal RS (2020) Privacy at work: A review and a research agenda for a contested terrain. J. Management 46(1):127–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein M (2022) Comprehensive meta‐analysis software. Egger M, Higgins JPT, Smith GD, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta‐analysis in Context (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ), 535–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2021) Introduction to Meta-analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(1):116–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S (2020) Does cultural difference matter on social media? An examination of the ethical culture and information privacy concerns. Sustainability 12(19):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cram WA, D’Arcy J, Proudfoot JG (2019) Seeing the forest and the trees: A meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. MIS Quart. 43(2):525–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cram WA, Proudfoot JG, D’Arcy J (2017) Organizational information security policies: A review and research framework. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(6):605–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossler RE, Posey C (2017) Robbing Peter to pay Paul: Surrendering privacy for security’s sake in an identity ecosystem. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(7):487–515.Google Scholar
  • Dinev T, Hart P (2004) Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents—measurement validity and a regression model. Behav. Inform. Tech. 23(6):413–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dinev T, McConnell AR, Smith HJ (2015) Research commentary—Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):639–655.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Esmaeilzadeh P (2018) The effects of public concern for information privacy on the adoption of health information exchanges (HIEs) by healthcare entities. Health Comm. 34(10):1202–1211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson CJ, Heene M (2012) A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 7(6):555–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox G, Connolly R (2018) Mobile health technology adoption across generations: Narrowing the digital divide. Inform. Systems J. 28(6):995–1019.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han M, Shen S, Zhou Y, Xu Z, Miao T, Qi J (2019) An analysis of the cause of privacy paradox among SNS users: Take Chinese college students as an example. Bui T, ed. Proc. 52nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. 2019 (University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu).Google Scholar
  • Harrison A (2018) The effects of media capabilities on the rationalization of online consumer fraud. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(5):408–440.Google Scholar
  • Harrison A, Mirsadikov A, Luu T (2023) Influence of media capabilities on trust in the sharing economy. J. Management Inform. Systems 40(3):953–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong W, Thong JY (2013) Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. MIS Quart. 37(1):275–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong W, Chan FK, Thong JY (2021) Drivers and inhibitors of internet privacy concern: A multidimensional development theory perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 168(3):539–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsieh J-K, Li H-T (2022) Exploring the fit between mobile application service and application privacy. J. Services Marketing 36(2):264–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu H-F, Moody GD, Galletta DF (2023) HARKing and P-hacking: A call for more transparent reporting of studies in the information systems field. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 52(1):853–876.Google Scholar
  • Hudson S, Liu Y (2023) Mobile app users’ privacy concerns: Different heuristics for privacy assurance statements in the EU and China. Inform. Tech. People 36(1):245–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter JE, Schmidt FL (2004) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd ed. (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Y, Ho Y-C, Yan X, Tan Y (2022) What’s in a “username”? The effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson RD, Pullin JE, Thatcher JB, Roth PL (2026) Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 27(1):153–188.Google Scholar
  • Johnston AC, Warkentin M, McBride M, Carter L (2016) Dispositional and situational factors: Influences on information security policy violations. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(3):231–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. MacLean LC, Ziemba WT, eds. Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making (World Scientific, Singapore), 99–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y, Kim SH, Peterson RA, Choi J (2023) Privacy concern and its consequences: A meta-analysis. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 196:122789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korzaan ML, Boswell KT (2008) The influence of personality traits and information privacy concerns on behavioral intentions. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 48(4):15–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krasnova H, Spiekermann S, Koroleva K, Hildebrand T (2010) Online social networks: Why we disclose. J. Inform. Tech. 25(2):109–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Kobsa A (2020) Context and privacy concerns in friend request decisions. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 71(6):632–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Liu H, Lee M, Huang Q (2020) Information privacy concern and deception in online retailing: The moderating effect of online–offline information integration. Internet Res. 30(2):511–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Liu H, Huang Q, Yang F, Lee MK (2018) Consumer decision making in multi-channel retail: The effects of online channel media richness and cross-channel integration. Proc. 51st Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 3548–3557.Google Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Dinev T, Willison R (2017) Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (IS) artefact: Proposing a bold research agenda. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(6):546–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maseeh HI, Jebarajakirthy C, Pentecost R, Arli D, Weaven S, Ashaduzzaman M (2021) Privacy concerns in e‐commerce: A multilevel meta‐analysis. Psych. Marketing 38(10):1779–1798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathes T, Kuss O (2018) A comparison of methods for meta‐analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes. Res. Synthesis Methods 9(3):366–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menard P, Bott GJ (2025) Artificial intelligence misuse and concern for information privacy: New construct validation and future directions. Inform. Systems J. 35(1):322–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R (2010) A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J. Management 36(1):121–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milberg SJ, Smith HJ, Burke SJ (2000) Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organ. Sci. 11(1):35–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miltgen CL, Peyrat-Guillard D (2014) Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: A qualitative study in seven European countries. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(2):103–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Min J, Kim B (2015) How are people enticed to disclose personal information despite privacy concerns in social network sites? The calculus between benefit and cost. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 66(4):839–857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morosan C, DeFranco A (2021) Using social distancing technology in hotels: A social exchange perspective. Internat. J. Contemporary Hospitality Management 33(10):3177–3198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy KR, Aguinis H (2019) HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? J. Bus. Psych. 34(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nichols WL (2012) Deception versus privacy management in discussions of sexual history. Atlantic J. Comm. 20(2):101–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okazaki S, Eisend M, Plangger K, de Ruyter K, Grewal D (2020) Understanding the strategic consequences of customer privacy concerns: A meta-analytic review. J. Retailing 96(4):458–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parks RF, Wigand RT, Lowry PB (2023) Balancing information privacy and operational utility in healthcare: Proposing a privacy impact assessment (PIA) framework. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(6):1052–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA (2011) State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quart. 35(4):977–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson RA, Brown SP (2005) On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 90(1):175–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin D, Kee KF, Shin EY (2022) Algorithm awareness: Why user awareness is critical for personal privacy in the adoption of algorithmic platforms? Internat. J. Inform. Management 65:102494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quart. 35(4):989–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solove DJ (2021) The myth of the privacy paradox. George Washington Law Rev. 89(1):1–51.Google Scholar
  • Switzer FS, Paese PW, Drasgow F (1992) Bootstrap estimates of standard errors in validity generalization. J. Appl. Psych. 77(2):123–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tonidandel S, LeBreton JM (2015) RWA Web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. J. Bus. Psych. 30:207–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X (2016) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(5):328–376.Google Scholar
  • Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev. 4(5):193–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westin AF (1967) Privacy and Freedom, 1st ed. (Atheneum, New York).Google Scholar
  • Xu H, Dinev T (2022) Guest Editorial: Reflections on the 2021 Impact Award: Why privacy still matters. MIS Quart. 46(4):xx–xxxii.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Zhang N (2022) From contextualizing to context theorizing: Assessing context effects in privacy research. Management Sci. 68(10):7383–7401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Zhang N (2024) An onto-epistemological analysis of information privacy research. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1422–1434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Dinev T, Smith J, Hart P (2011) Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(12):798–824.Google Scholar
  • Xu H, Gupta S, Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2012) Measuring mobile users’ concerns for information privacy. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2278–2293.Google Scholar
  • Xu D, Hong H, Deng L, Zhang X (2025) Crowdfunding success factors: A meta-analytic investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 37(1):195–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yun H, Han D, Lee CC (2013) Understanding the use of location-based service applications: Do privacy concerns matter? J. Electronic Commerce Res. 14(3):215–230.Google Scholar
  • Yun H, Lee G, Kim DJ (2019) A chronological review of empirical research on personal information privacy concerns: An analysis of contexts and research constructs. Inform. Management 56(4):570–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaza S, Joseph D, Armstrong DJ (2023) Are IT professionals unique? A second-order meta-analytic comparison of turnover intentions across occupations. MIS Quart. 47(3):1213–1238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang NA, Wang CA, Karahanna E, Xu Y (2022) Peer privacy concern: Conceptualization and measurement. MIS Quart. 46(1):491–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.