Numerological Heuristics and Credit Risk in Peer-to-Peer Lending

References

• Abraham KG, Filiz-Ozbay E, Ozbay EY, Turner LJ (2022) Effects of the menu of loan contracts on borrower behavior. Management Sci. 68(1):509–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Blake T, Tadelis S (2019) On the empirical content of cheap-talk signaling. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1599–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahreini AF, Cenfetelli R, Cavusoglu H (2022) The role of heuristics in information security decision making. Bui TX, ed. Proc. 55th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC), 4816–4825.Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler R (2001) Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler R (2007) Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(3):81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia), 551–572.Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Holden CW, Jacobsen S (2012) Penny wise, dollar foolish: Buy–sell imbalances on and around round numbers. Management Sci. 58(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Kuo WY, Lin TC, Zhao J (2018) Do superstitious traders lose money? Management Sci. 64(8):3772–3791.Link, Google Scholar
• Block L, Kramer T (2009) The effect of superstitious beliefs on performance expectations. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 37(2):161–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Wang CA, Zhang XM (2021) The economics of IT and digitization: Eight questions for research. MIS Quart. 45(1):473–477.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Chan J (2019) Investigating the relationship between medical crowdfunding and personal bankruptcy in the United States: Evidence of a digital divide. MIS. Quart. 43(1):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quart. 38(3):773–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi B, Wu Y, Yu J, Land LPW (2018) Love at first sight: The interplay between privacy dispositions and privacy calculus in online social connectivity management. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(3):4.Google Scholar
• DeFusco AA, Paciorek A (2017) The interest rate elasticity of mortgage demand: Evidence from bunching at the conforming loan limit. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(1):210–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demir T, Mohammadi A, Shafi K (2021) Crowdfunding as gambling: Evidence from repeated natural experiments. J. Corporate Finance 77:101905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, McConnell AR, Smith HJ (2015) Research commentary—Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):639–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Du N, Li L, Lu T, Lu X (2020) Prosocial compliance in P2P lending: A natural field experiment. Management Sci. 66(1):315–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Duarte J, Siegel S, Young L (2012) Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2455–2484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortin NM, Hill AJ, Huang J (2014) Superstition in the housing market. Econom. Inquiry 52(3):974–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Lin M, Sias RW (2023) Words matter: The role of texts in online credit markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geva H, Barzilay O, Oestreicher-Singer G (2019) A potato salad with a lemon twist: Using supply-side shocks to study the impact of low-quality actors on crowdfunding platforms. MIS Quart. 43(4):1227–1248.Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 62:451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Muntermann J (2014) Research note—Heuristic theorizing: Proactively generating design theories. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):639–653.Link, Google Scholar
• Hasan I, He Q, Lu H (2021) Social capital, trusting, and trustworthiness: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 57(4):1409–1453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Liu H, Sing TF, Song C, Wong WK (2020) Superstition, conspicuous spending, and housing market: Evidence from Singapore. Management Sci. 66(2):503–1004.Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Zhang XM, Zhao L, Zheng E (2021) FinTech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Hildebrand T, Puri M, Rocholl J (2017) Adverse incentives in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 63(3):587–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D (2001) Investor psychology and asset pricing. J. Finance 56(4):1533–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D (2015) Behavioral finance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 7:133–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Jian M, Zhang H (2018) Superstition and financial decision making. Management Sci. 64(1):235–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Levi Y, Lourie B, Teoh SH (2019) Decision fatigue and heuristic analyst forecasts. J. Financial Econom. 133(1):83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Hu Y, Burtch G (2018) Embeddedness, pro-sociality, and social influence: Evidence from online crowdfunding. MIS Quart. 42(4):1211–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Li X, Shi Y (2019). Adverse selection and credit certificates: Evidence from a P2P platform. Preprint, submitted October 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3470048.Google Scholar
• Hukkanen P, Keloharju M (2019) Initial offer precision and M&A outcomes. Financial Management 48(1):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Khwaja AI, Luttmer EF, Shue K (2016) Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Management Sci. 62(6):1554–1577.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ho YC, Yan X, Tan Y (2020) When online lending meets real estate: Examining investment decisions in lending-based real estate crowdfunding. Inform. Systems. Res. 31(3):715–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ho YC, Yan X, Tan Y (2022) What’s in a “username”? The effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic SP, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, Zinman J (2009) Observing unobservables: Identifying information asymmetries with a consumer credit field experiment. Econometrica 77(6):1993–2008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M, Alho E, Puttonen V (2008) How much does expertise reduce behavioral biases? The case of anchoring effects in stock return estimates. Financial Management 37(3):391–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KC DS (2020) Heuristic thinking in patient care. Management Sci. 66(6):2545–2563.Link, Google Scholar
• Keys BJ, Wang J (2019) Minimum payments and debt paydown in consumer credit cards. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):528–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Viswanathan S (2019) The experts in the crowd: The role of experienced investors in a crowdfunding market. MIS Quart. 43(2):347–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Park J, Pan Y, Zhang K, Zhang XM (2022) Risk disclosure in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):1023–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• Kramer T, Block L (2008) Conscious and nonconscious components of superstitious beliefs in judgment and decision making. J. Consumer Res. 34(6):783–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo WY, Lin TC, Zhao J (2015) Cognitive limitation and investment performance: Evidence from limit order clustering. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(3):838–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Lu H, Hasan I (2020) The promises and pitfalls of WealthTech: Evidence from online marketplace lending. Preprint, submitted May 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575260.Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2016) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin TC, Pursiainen V (2021) The round number heuristic and entrepreneur crowdfunding performance. J. Corporate Finance 68:101894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Brass D, Lu Y, Chen D (2015) Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quart. 39(3):729–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang X, Min Q, Li W (2019) The effect of role conflict on self-disclosure in social network sites: An integrated perspective of boundary regulation and dual process model. Inform. Systems J. 29(2):279–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Yuan M, Wang CA, Zhang XM (2022) Histogram distortion bias in consumer choices. Management Sci. 68(12):8963–8978.Link, Google Scholar
• Luan S, Reb J, Gigerenzer G (2019) Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1735–1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma X, Kim SH, Kim SS (2014) Online gambling behavior: The impacts of cumulative outcomes, recent outcomes, and prior use. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):511–527.Link, Google Scholar
• Papi M (2012) Satisficing choice procedures. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(1):451–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paravisini D, Rappoport V, Ravina E (2017) Risk aversion and wealth: Evidence from person-to-person lending portfolios. Management Sci. 63(2):279–297.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(1):221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope D, Simonsohn U (2011) Round numbers as goals: Evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the laboratory. Psych. Sci. 22(1):71–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D, Taggart W (1982) Human information processing in information and decision support system, MIS Quart. 6(2):61–73.Google Scholar
• Roma P, Gal-Or E, Chen RR (2018) Reward-based crowdfunding campaigns: Informational value and access to venture capital. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):679–697.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psych. 7(4):532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowe PG (1987) Design Thinking (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schindler RM, Kirby PN (1997) Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):192–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psych. Bull. 134(2):207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiller RJ (2003) From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shum M, Sun W, Ye G (2014) Superstition and “lucky” apartments: Evidence from transaction-level data. J. Comp. Econom. 42(1):109–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons LC, Schindler RM (2003) Cultural superstitions and the price endings used in Chinese advertising. J. Internat. Marketing 11(2):101–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 109–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhang XM, Zhu F (2019) U-shaped conformity in online social networks. Marketing Sci. 38(3):461–480.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Simon DH, Kadiyali V (2010) The price precision effect: Evidence from laboratory and market data. Marketing Sci. 29(1):175–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa M, Zhang K (2015) This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 41(5):1172–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Lin M (2017) Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 63(12):4236–4257.Link, Google Scholar
• Wong WC, Abdullah NAH, Lim HE (2019) The value of Chinese superstitions in Malaysia: Evidence from car plate auctioning. Singapore Econom. Rev. 64(01):115–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan D, Pena-Marin J (2017) Round off the bargaining: The effects of offer roundness on willingness to accept. J. Consumer Res. 44(2):381–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar