Who’s Watching TV?

References

• Abe M (1996) Audience accumulation by television daypart allocation based on household-level viewing data. J. Advertising 25(4):21–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby G, Fennell G, Bemmaor A, Bhargava V, Christen F, Dawley J, Dickson P, et al. (2002) Market segmentation research: Beyond within and across group differences. Marketing Lett. 13(3):233–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora N, Allenby GM (1999) Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making. J. Marketing Res. 36(4):476–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Chopra S, Applegate D, Urbanek S (2012) Computational television advertising. 2012 IEEE 12th Internat. Conf. Data Mining (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 71–80.Google Scholar
• Belch GE, Belch MA, Ceresino G (1985) Parental and teenage child influences in family decision making. J. Bus. Res. 13(2):163–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chaney AJ, Gartrell M, Hofman JM, Guiver J, Koenigstein N, Kohli P, Paquet U (2014) A large-scale exploration of group viewing patterns. Proc. 2014 ACM Internat. Conf. Interactive Experiences TV Online Video (ACM, New York), 31–38.Google Scholar
• Clark J, Provost F (2019) Unsupervised dimensionality reduction vs. supervised regularization for classification from sparse data. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 33:871–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Jackel LD, Solla S, Vapnik V, Denker J (1993) Learning curves: Asymptotic values and rate of convergence. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 6 (Morgan-Kaufmann, Burlington, MA), 327–334.Google Scholar
• Currim IS, Shoemaker RW (1990) Is television advertising being placed to reach product users? Marketing Lett. 1(3):209–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daume H III, Marcu D (2006) Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 26:101–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietterich TG, Lathrop RH, Lozano-Pérez T (1997) Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence 89(1):31–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong L (2006) A comparison of multi-instance learning algorithms. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
• Dorai-Raj S, Interian Y, Zigmond D (2010) Evaluating TV ad campaigns using set-top box data. Report, Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
• Ducheneaut N, Moore RJ, Oehlberg L, Thornton JD, Nickell E (2008) Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 24(2):136–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav G, Carey J (2009) Is TV dead? Consumer behavior in the digital TV environment and beyond. Television Goes Digital, 115–129.Google Scholar
• Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Lett. 27(8):861–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RE, Massey WF, Wind Y (1972) Market Segmentation (Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hill S, Benton AD (2012) Social TV: Linking TV content to buzz and sales. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Orlando, FL), 88.Google Scholar
• Hill S, Benton A, Panniello U (2019) Talkographics: Measuring TV and brand audience demographics and interests from user-generated content. Internat. J. Electronic Comm. 23(3):364–404.Google Scholar
• Horen JH (1980) Scheduling of network television programs. Management Sci. 26(4):354–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Hurwitz B (2018) Three big misconceptions about addressable TV advertising. Broadcasting & Cable. Accessed March 14, 2019, https://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/three-big-misconceptions-about-addressable-tv-advertising.Google Scholar
• Jameson A (2004) More than the sum of its members: Challenges for group recommender systems. Proc. Working Conf. Adv. Visual Interfaces (ACM, New York), 48–54.Google Scholar
• Jameson A, Smyth B (2007) Recommendation to groups. The Adaptive Web (Springer, Berlin), 596–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerho S (2012) Mobile marketing-a new analytics framework, what we have & what we need. Marketing Move Conf. Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Kinjo K, Ebina T (2015) State-dependent choice model for TV programs with externality: Analysis of viewing behavior. J. Media Econom. 28(1):20–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitts B, Au D (2014) A comparison of algorithms for TV ad targeting. 2014 IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining Workshop (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 296–305.Google Scholar
• Kotzias D, Denil M, Blunsom P, de Freitas N (2014) Deep multi-instance transfer learning. Preprint, submitted November 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3128.Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Quart. J. Econom. 64(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin T, Misra S (2022) Frontiers: The identity fragmentation bias. Marketing Sci. 41(3):433–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu G, Wu J, Zhou ZH (2012) Key instance detection in multi-instance learning. Asian Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 253–268.Google Scholar
• Lull J (2014) Inside Family Viewing (Routledge Revivals): Ethnographic Research on Television’s Audiences (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maron O, Lozano-Pérez T (1998) A framework for multiple-instance learning. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 10:570–576.Google Scholar
• Masthoff J (2004) Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. Personalized Digital Television (Springer, Berlin), 93–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masthoff J (2011) Group recommender systems: Combining individual models. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, Berlin), 677–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCluskey M (2022) Using someone else’s Netflix password? A crackdown is coming in “early 2023.” Time Online. Accessed October 20, 2022, https://time.com/6223415/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown/.Google Scholar
• Meyer D, Hyndman RJ (2006) The accuracy of television network rating forecasts: The effects of data aggregation and alternative models. Model Assisted Statist. Appl. 1(3):147–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mora JD (2010) Understanding the social structure of television audiences: Three essays. Unpublished PhD thesis, Simon Frasier University, Vancouver.Google Scholar
• Mora JD (2012) Fuzzy dynamic groups: Measures and implications for television audiences. Fuzzy Methods for Customer Relationship Management and Marketing: Applications and Classifications, 41.Google Scholar
• Mora JD, Krider R (2007) Life Beyond Individual Choice: Group Behaviour in Television Audiences, vol. 28 (ASAC).Google Scholar
• Morley D (2005) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison M, Krugman DM (2001) A look at mass and computer mediated technologies: Understanding the roles of television and computers in the home. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media 45(1):135–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 22(10):1345–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlberg S (2014) Targeted ads? TV can do that now too. The Wall Street Journal. Accessed March 14, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/targeted-ads-tv-can-do-that-now-too-1416506504.Google Scholar
• Provost F, Martens D, Murray A (2015) Finding similar mobile consumers with a privacy-friendly geosocial design. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):243–265.Link, Google Scholar
• Raykar VC, Krishnapuram B, Bi J, Dundar M, Rao RB (2008) Bayesian multiple instance learning: Automatic feature selection and inductive transfer. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ACM, New York), 808–815.Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Eechambadi NV (1989) Scheduling network television programs: A heuristic audience flow approach to maximizing audience share. J. Advertising 18(2):11–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Kamakura WA, Alpert MI (1992) Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models for network television. J. Advertising 21(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solsman JE (2013) Netflix tweak lets families split up viewing profiles. CNET Online. Accessed August 20, 2016, https://www.cnet.com/news/netflix-tweak-lets-families-split-up-viewing-profiles/.Google Scholar
• Spangler WE, Gal-Or M, May JH (2003) Using data mining to profile TV viewers. Comm. ACM 46(12):66–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su C, Fern EF, Ye K (2003) A temporal dynamic model of spousal family purchase-decision behavior. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):268–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Households and families: 2010. Accessed April 18, 2017, https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf.Google Scholar
• Vranica S (2010) Targeted TV ads set for takeoff. The Wall Street Journal. Accessed August 20, 2016, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704226504576029871779927478.Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zucker JD (2000) Solving the Multiple-Instance Problem: A Lazy Learning Approach (ICML, San Diego, CA), 1119–1126.Google Scholar
• Weber R (2002) Methods to forecast television viewing patterns for target audiences. Communication Research in Europe and Abroad Challenges of the First Decade (DeGruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Wind Y (1978) Issues and advances in segmentation research. J. Marketing Res. 15(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu X, Frank E (2004) Logistic regression and boosting for labeled bags of instances. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Springer, Berlin), 272–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Narayan V, Assael H (2006) Estimating the interdependence of television program viewership between spouses: A Bayesian simultaneous equation model. Marketing Sci. 25(4):336–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Zhao Y, Erdem T, Zhao Y (2010) Modeling the intrahousehold behavioral interaction. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):470–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Si L (2009) Multiple instance transfer learning. IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining Workshop (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 406–411.Google Scholar
• Zhou ZH, Sun YY, Li YF (2009) Multi-instance learning by treating instances as non-IID samples. Proc. 26th Annual Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ACM, New York), 1249–1256.Google Scholar