Interorganizational Systems and Supply Chain Agility in Uncertain Environments: The Mediation Role of Supply Chain Collaboration

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avgar A, Tambe P, Hitt LM (2018) Built to learn: How work practices affect employee learning during healthcare information technology implementation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):645–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barratt M (2004) Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management 9(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M, Venkatraman N (1995) Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between US and Japanese automakers. Management Sci. 41(9):1471–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Blome C, Schoenherr T, Rexhausen D (2013) Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Internat. J. Production Res. 51(4):1295–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel MJ, Suresh NC (2009) The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. J. Oper. Management 27(2):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown RD, Hauenstein NM (2005) Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the RWG indices. Organ. Res. Methods 8(2):165–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(4):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai S, Jun M, Yang Z (2010) Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. J. Oper. Management 28(3):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao M, Zhang Q (2011) Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Management 29(3):163–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao M, Vonderembse MA, Zhang Q, Ragu-Nathan TS (2010) Supply chain collaboration: Conceptualization and instrument development. Internat. J. Production Res. 48(22):6613–6635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caridi M, Cigolini R, De Marco D (2005) Improving supply chain collaboration by linking intelligent agents to CPFR. Internat. J. Production Res. 43(20):4191–4218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Chae B, Yen HR, Sheu C (2005) Information technology and supply chain collaboration: Moderating effects of existing relationships between partners. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 52(4):440–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Understanding supply chain management: Critical research and a theoretical framework. Internat. J. Production Res. 42(1):131–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang CY, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer C, Suresh N (2012) An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 32(1):49–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
• Dong MC, Fang Y, Straub DW (2017) The impact of institutional distance on the joint performance of collaborating firms: The role of adaptive interorganizational systems. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):309–331.Link, Google Scholar
• Drenik G (2022) How this DTC furniture brand takes a proactive approach to solving supply chain issues. Forbes Magazine (May 10), https://biz.crast.net/how-this-dtc-furniture-brand-takes-a-proactive-approach-to-solving-supply-chain-issues/.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingrud K (2020). Reimagining supply chain resilience. Forbes Magazine (August 20), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kweilinellingrud/2020/08/20/reimagining-supply-chain-resilience/?sh=58f1fd489c87.Google Scholar
• Fawcett SE, Magnan GM, McCarter MW (2008) Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management 13(1):35–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayezi S, Zutshi A, O’Loughlin A (2017) Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: A structured literature review. Internat. J. Management Rev. 19(4):379–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germain R, Dröge C, Daugherty PJ (1994) The effect of just-in-time selling on organizational structure: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing Res. 31(4):471–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gligor DM, Esmark CL, Holcomb MC (2015) Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? J. Oper. Management 33–34:71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gligor DM, Holcomb MC (2012) Antecedents and consequences of supply chain agility: Establishing the link to firm performance. J. Bus. Logist. 33(4):295–308.Google Scholar
• Gligor DM, Holcomb MC, Feizabadi J (2016) An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: The role of a firm’s orientations. Internat. J. Production Econom. 179(September):24–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S, Malhotra A, El Sawy OA (2004) Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(3):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O (2021) Bridging art and science: Phenomenon-driven theorizing. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1509–1523.Google Scholar
• Grover V, Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P (2012) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Lai KH, Cheng TE (2008) Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 36(4):549–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutman K (2003) How GM is accelerating vehicle deployment. Supply Chain Management Rev. 7(3):34–39.Google Scholar
• Huo B, Zhao X, Zhou H (2014) The effects of competitive environment on supply chain information sharing and performance: An empirical study in China. Production Oper. Management 23(4):552–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2013) IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):72–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Keats BW, Hitt MA (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31(3):570–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, McIntosh CN (2017) Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. J. Oper. Management 52:1–14.Google Scholar
• Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. 21(3):405–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar RL (2004) A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(2):11–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Pacchia ML, Milutinovic A, Schmidt J (2021) Navigating the retail storm through supply chain agility. McKinsey Quarterly (May 11), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/navigating-the-retail-storm-through-supply-chain-agility.Google Scholar
• Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC (2006) The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2):202–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lejeune MA, Yakova N (2005) On characterizing the 4 C’s in supply chain management. J. Oper. Management 23(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(32):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G, Lin Y, Wang S, Yan H (2006) Enhancing agility by timely sharing of supply information. Supply Chain Management 11(5):425–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu G, Ding XD, Peng DX, Chuang HH-C (2018) Addressing endogeneity in operations management research: Recent developments, common problems, and directions for future research. J. Oper. Management 64:53–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Gasain S, El Sawy OA (2005) Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):145–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Gosain S, El Sawy OA (2007) Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):260–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Manthou V, Vlachopoulou M, Folinas D (2004) Virtual e-Chain (VeC) model for supply chain collaboration. Internat. J. Production Econom. 87(3):241–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mark G, Lyytinen K, Bergman M (2007) Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(11):546–568.Google Scholar
• Metters R (1997) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. J. Oper. Management 15(2):89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mondragon AE, Lyons AC, Kehoe DF (2004) Assessing the value of information systems in supporting agility in high-tech manufacturing enterprises. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 24(12):1219–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan J (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23(3):612–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Nyaga GN, Whipple JM, Lynch DF (2010) Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? J. Oper. Management 28(2):101–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X (2013) Research commentary—Information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):1–14.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivard S (2021) Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft. J. Inform. Tech. 36(3):316–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D, Im G, Wareham JD (2008) Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(9):497–518.Google Scholar
• Sänger F (2022) Achieving supply chain resiliency in consumer goods amid disruption. McKinsey Quarterly (January 10), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/achieving-supply-chain-resiliency-in-consumer-goods-amid-disruption.Google Scholar
• Saraf N, Langdon CS, Gosain S (2007) IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):320–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawyerr OO, McGee J, Peterson M (2003) Perceived uncertainty and firm performance in SMEs: The role of personal networking activities. Internat. Small Bus. J. 21(3):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management J. 35(2):179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segars AH, Grover V (1998) Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22(2):139–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen ZM, Sun Y (2021) Strengthening supply chain resilience during COVID-19: A case study of JD. com. J. Oper. Management. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2005) An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration. Internat. J. Logist. Management 16(2):257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol. Methodology 13:290–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3):387–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steerman H (2003) A practical look at CPFR: The Sears-Michelin experience. Supply Chain Management Re. 7(4):46–53.Google Scholar
• Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2006) The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. J. Oper. Management 24(2):170–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2008) Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. Internat. J. Production Econom. 116(2):288–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(2):463–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yeung JHY, Zhang M (2011) The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Internat. J. Production Econom. 134(1):114–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong CY, Boon-Itt S, Wong CWY (2011) The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. J. Oper. Management 29(6):604–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Chiu ML (2018) Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives. Internat. J. Inform. Management 39(April):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J (2014) Supply chain agility: Securing performance for Chinese manufacturers. Internat. J. Production Econom. 150(April):104–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Cao M (2018) Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation. Internat. J. Production Econom. 195:146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Xia M (2014) Forming interoperability through interorganizational systems standards. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(4):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V, Xu SX (2006) Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(1):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):189–221.Crossref, Google Scholar