Atrophy in Aging Systems: Evidence, Dynamics, and Antidote

References

• Agarwal R, Tiwana A (2015) Evolvable systems: Through the looking glass of IS. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):473–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Arbesman S (2017) Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension (Portfolio, New York).Google Scholar
• Arthur B (2009) The Nature of Technology (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Banker R, Slaughter S (2000) The moderating effects of structure on volatility and complexity in software enhancement. Inform. Systems Res. 11(3):219–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Barr A (2018) The Problem with Software: Why Smart Engineers Write Bad Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbya H, Nan N, Tanriverdi H, Yoo Y (2020) Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(1):1–17.Google Scholar
• Biémont C, Vieira C (2006) Junk DNA as an evolutionary force. Nature 443(7111):521–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booch G (2007) The economics of architecture-first. IEEE Software 24(5):18–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booch G (2008) Measuring architectural complexity. IEEE Software 25(4):14–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borges H, Valente M (2018) What’s in a GitHub Star? Understanding repository starring practices in a social coding platform. J. Systems Software 146:112–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clearfield C (2019) Meltdown: What Plane Crashes, Oil Spills, and Dumb Business Decisions Can Teach Us About How to Succeed at Work and at Home (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Coleman D (1994) using metrics to evaluate software system maintainability. IEEE Computer 27(8):44–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleridge S (1798) The rime of the ancyent marinere. Lyrical Ballads (J. & A. Arch, London).Google Scholar
• Eick S, Graves T, Karr A, Marron J, Mockus A (2001) Does code decay? Assessing evidence from change management data. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 27(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford N, Parsons R, Kua P (2017) Building Evolutionary Architectures: Support Constant Change (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
• Fürstenau D, Baiyere AKN (2019) A dynamic model of embeddedness in digital infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1319–1342.Link, Google Scholar
• Garcia J, Kouroshfar E, Ghorbani N, Malek S (2022) Forecasting architectural decay from evolutionary history. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 48(7):2439–2454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghanbari H, Vartiainen T, Siponen M (2018) Omission of quality software development practices: A systematic literature review. ACM Comput. Survey 51(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herraiz I, Rodriguez D, Robles G, Gonzalez-Barahona J (2013) The evolution of the laws of software evolution: A discussion based on a systematic literature review. ACM Comput. Survey 46(2):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly J, McGrath J (1988) On Time and Method (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruchten P, Nord R, Ozkaya I (2012) Technical debt: From metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Software 29(6):18–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman M (1979) On understanding laws, evolution, and conservation in the large-program life cycle. J. Systems Software 1:213–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2016) Coordinating interdependencies in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):751–772.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin C (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• McCabe T (1976) A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 2(4):308–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minsky M (2006) The Emotion Machine (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Balasubramanian S, Swaminathan J (2009) A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. 55(11):1861–1876.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B, Liu P, Kremser W, Hærem T (2020) The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(1):19–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolland K, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) Managing digital platforms in user organizations: The interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):419–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Salganik M (2017) Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Smith C (1981) A Search for Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sobhy D, Bahsoon R, Minku L, Kazman R (2021) Evaluation of software architectures under uncertainty: A systematic literature review. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology 30(4):1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman Z, Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S (2019) Performance consequences of information technology investments: Implications of emphasizing new or current information technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):204–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Subramanyam R, Ramasubbu N, Krishnan M (2012) In search of efficient flexibility: Effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):787–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2016) Platform desertion by app developers. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):40–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2018) Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 24(9):829–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Tufte E (2020) Seeing with Different Eyes: Meaning, Space, Data, Truth (Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT).Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox P, Giner J (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wittmann M (2017) Felt Time: The Science of How We Experience Time (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar