Shedding Light on the Dark: The Impact of Legal Enforcement on Darknet Transactions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1222

References

  • Abadie A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adermon A, Liang CY (2014) Piracy and music sales: The effects of an anti-piracy law. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 105:90–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguiar L, Claussen J, Peukert C (2018) Catch me if you can: Effectiveness and consequences of online copyright enforcement. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):656–678.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aldridge J, Askew R (2017) Delivery dilemmas: How drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement. Internat. J. Drug Policy 41:101–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D (2014) Not an ‘Ebay for drugs’: The cryptomarket ‘Silk Road’ as a paradigm shifting criminal innovation. Preprint, submitted May 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436643.Google Scholar
  • Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bachman R, Paternoster R, Ward S (1992) The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law Soc. Rev. 26(2):343–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batikas M, Kretschmer T (2018) Entrepreneurship anonymous marketplaces: Reaction to negative feedback. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 14792.Google Scholar
  • Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76(2):169–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin V, Valacich JS, Chen H (2019) DICE-E: A framework for conducting darknet identification, collection, evaluation with ethics. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhaskar V, Linacre R, Machin S (2019) The economic functioning of online drugs markets. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 159:426–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein A, Cohen J, Nagin D (1978) Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Braga AA, Weisburd DL (2012) The effects of “pulling levers” focused deterrence strategies on crime. Campbell Systems Rev. 8(1):1–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branwen G, Christin N, Décary-Hétu D, Andersen R, StExo, El Presidente, Anonymous, Lau D, Sohhlz, Kratunov D, Cakic V, Van Buskirk, Whom, McKenna M, Goode S. Dark Net Market archives, 2011–2015, July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
  • Broséus J, Rhumorbarbe D, Morelato M, Staehli L, Rossy Q (2017) A geographical analysis of trafficking on a popular darknet market. Forensic Sci. Internat. 277:88–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan J, Mojumder P, Ghose A (2019) The digital sin city: An empirical study of Craigslist’s impact on prostitution trends. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):219–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christin N (2013) Traveling the silk road: A measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 213–224.Google Scholar
  • Cohan P (2012) Six strategy principles of a world-leading drug lord. Forbes. (November 10, 2022).Google Scholar
  • Coomber R, Moyle L, South N (2016) The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs Ed. Prevention Policy 23(3):255–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corsaro N, McGarrell EF (2009) Testing a promising homicide reduction strategy: Re-assessing the impact of the Indianapolis “pulling levers” intervention. J. Experiment. Criminology 5(1):63–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Arcy J, Herath T (2011) A review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: Making sense of the disparate findings. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 20(6):643–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Arcy J, Hovav A, Galletta DF (2009) User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: A deterrence perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):79–98.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD (2014) Gone in 60 seconds: The impact of the Megaupload shutdown on movie sales. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 33:1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R, Chen S (2014) The effect of graduated response anti-piracy laws on music sales: Evidence from an event study in France. J. Indust. Econom. 62(3):541–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davies G (2020) Shining a light on policing of the dark web: An analysis of UK investigatory powers. J. Criminal Law 84(5):407–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Décary-Hétu D, Giommoni L (2017) Do police crackdowns disrupt drug cryptomarkets? A longitudinal analysis of the effects of Operation Onymous. Crime Law Soc. Change 67:55–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demant J, Munksgaard R, Houborg E (2018) Personal use, social supply or redistribution? Cryptomarket demand on Silk Road 2 and Agora. Trends Organized Crime 21(1):42–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson T, Jacques S (2019) Drug sellers’ neutralizations of guiltless drug sales and avoidance of “drug dealer” identities. Internat. J. Drug Policy 73:16–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dittus M, Wright J, Graham M (2018) Platform criminalism: The last-mile geography of the darknet market supply chain. Proc. 2018 Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Lyon France), 277–286.Google Scholar
  • Dolliver DS, Kenney JL (2016) Characteristics of drug vendors on the Tor network: A cryptomarket comparison. Victims Offenders 11(4):600–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felbab-Brown V (2013) Focused Deterrence, Selective Targeting, Drug Trafficking and Organised Crime: Concepts and Practicalities. Preprint, submitted February 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2290302.Google Scholar
  • Foglia WD (1997) Perceptual deterrence and the mediating effect of internalized norms among inner-city teenagers. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 34(4):414–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh S, Das A, Porras P, Yegneswaran V, Gehani A (2017) Automated categorization of onion sites for analyzing the darkweb ecosystem. Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1793–1802.Google Scholar
  • Guan X, Lo TW (2021) Restrictive deterrence in drug offenses: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of mixed studies. Frontiers Psych. 12:727142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy RA, Norgaard JR (2016) Reputation in the internet black market: An empirical and theoretical analysis of the deep web. J. Inst. Econom. 12(3):515–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrington SJ (1996) The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgements and intensions. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 20(3):257–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He S, Peng J, Li J, Xu L (2020) Impact of platform owner’s entry on third-party stores. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1467–1484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hearth T, Rao HR (2009) Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decision Support Systems 47(2):154–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho TN, Ng WK (2016) Application of stylometry to Darkweb Forum user identification. Inform. Comm. Security: Proc. 18th Internat. Conf., ICICS 2016 (Springer International Publishing, Berlin), 173–183.Google Scholar
  • Hollinger RC, Clark JP (1983) Deterrence in the workplace: Perceived certainty, perceived severity, and employee theft. Soc. Forces 62(2):398–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horney J, Marshall IH (1992) Risk perceptions among serious offenders: The role of crime and punishment. Criminology 30(4):575–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hout MC, Bingham T (2013) ‘Surfing the silk road’: A study of users’ experiences. Internat. J. Drug Policy 24(6):524–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui KL, Kim SH, Wang QH (2017) Cybercrime deterrence and international legislation: Evidence from distributed denial of service attacks. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):497–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irrera A (2019) Daily Bitcoin transactions on darknet markets doubled throughout 2018. Business Insider (January 18) https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/daily-bitcoin-transactions-on-darknet-markets-doubled-throughout-2018–report-7040113.Google Scholar
  • Jacinto C, Duterte M, Sales P, Murphy S (2008) “I’m not a real dealer”: The identity process of ecstasy sellers. J. Drug Issues 38(2):419–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs BA (2010) Deterrence and deterrability. Criminology 48(2):417–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs BA, Miller J (1998) Crack dealing, gender, and arrest avoidance. Soc. Problems 45(4):550–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson BD, Natarajan M (1995) Strategies to avoid arrest: Crack sellers’ response to intensified policing. Amer. J. Police 14(3/4):49–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy D (2009) Drugs, race and common ground: Reflections on the high point intervention. National. Inst. Justice J. 262:12–17.Google Scholar
  • Kruithof K, Aldridge J, Hétu D, Sim M, Dujso E, Hoorens S (2016) Internet-facilitated drugs trade: An analysis of the size, scope and the role of the Netherlands. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/internet-facilitated-drugs-trade-an-analysis-of-the-size-scope-an.Google Scholar
  • Kshetri N (2006) The simple economics of cybercrimes. IEEE Security Privacy Magazine 4(1):33–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mann RE, Smart RG, Stoduto G, Adlaf EM, Vinglis E, Beirness D, Lamble R, Ashbridge M (2003) The effects of drinking-driving laws: A test of the differential deterrence hypothesis. Addiction 98(11):1531–1536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J, Munksgaard R, Coomber R, Demant J, Barratt MJ (2020) Corrigendum to: Selling drugs on Darkweb cryptomarkets: Differentiated pathways, risks and rewards. British J. Criminology 60(3):559–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKenzie J (2017) Graduated response policies to digital piracy: Do they increase box office revenues of movies? Inform. Econom. Policy 38:1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meier R, Burkett SR, Hickman CA (1984) Sanction, peers and deviance: Preliminary models of a social control process. Sociol. Quart. 25(1):67–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moeller K, Sandberg S (2019) Putting a price on drugs: An economic sociological study of price formation in illegal drug markets. Criminology 57(2):289–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohamed AR, Fritsvold ED (2010) Dorm Room Dealers: Drugs and the Privileges of Race and Class (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  • Nagin DS (1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime Justice 23:1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paternoster R (1987) The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quart. 4(2):173–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paternoster R, Iovanni L (1986) The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A reexamination. Soc. Forces 64(3):751–777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paternoster R, Simpson S (1996) Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law Soc. Rev. 30(3):549–584.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1983) Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? Law Soc. Rev. 17(3):457–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paternoster R, Saltzman LE, Waldo GP, Chiricos TG (1985) Assessments of risk and behavioral experience: An exploratory study of change. Criminology 23(3):417–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Png IP, Wang C, Wang QH (2008) The deterrent and displacement effects of information security enforcement: International evidence. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(2):125–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime Justice Rev. Res. 32:373–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Blevins KR, Daigle LE, Madensen TD (2006) The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. Cullen FT, Wright JP, Blevins KR eds. Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ), 367–395.Google Scholar
  • Rhumorbarbe D, Staehli L, Broséus J, Rossy Q, Esseiva P (2016) Buying drugs on a darknet market: A better deal? Studying the online illicit drug market through the analysis of digital, physical and chemical data. Forensic Sci. Internat. 267:173–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samtani S, Zhu H, Chen H (2020) Proactively identifying emerging hacker threats on the dark web: A diachronic graph embedding framework (D-GEF). ACM Trans. Privacy Security 23(4):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samtani S, Chinn R, Chen H, Nunamaker J (2017) Exploring emerging hacker assets and key hackers for proactive cyber threat intelligence. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(4):1023–1053.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soska K, Christin N (2015) Measuring the longitudinal evolution of the online anonymous marketplace ecosystem. Proc. 24th USENIX Security Sympos (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Straub EW (1990) Effective IS security: An empirical study. Inform. Systems Res. 1(3):255–276.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):664–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tittle CR (1980) Sanctions and Social Deviance (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tittle CR, Botchkovar EV (2005) Self‐control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology 43(2):307–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tittle CR, Rowe AR (1974) Certainty of arrest and crime rates: A further test of the deterrence hypothesis. Social Forces 52(4):455–462.Google Scholar
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2020) Focus: Trafficking over the Darknet. World Drug Report, United Nations, New York. https://www.unodc.org/documents/Focus/WDR20_Booklet_4_Darknet_web.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (2020). Frequently Used Federal Drug Statutes (Washington, DC). Accessed November 29, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/usao-nh/frequently-used-federal-drug-statutes.Google Scholar
  • Van Buskirk J, Bruno R, Dobbins T, Breen C, Burns L, Naicker S, Roxburgh A (2017) The recovery of online drug markets following law enforcement and other disruptions. Drug Alcohol Dependence 173:159–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vannostrand LM, Tewksbury R (1999) The motives and mechanics of operating an illegal drug enterprise. Deviant Behav. 20(1):57–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KR, Hawkins R (1986) Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law Soc. Rev. 20(4):545–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wingrove T, Korpas A, Weisz V (2011) Why were millions of people not obeying the law? Motivational influences on non-compliance with the law in the case of music piracy. Psych. Crime Law 17(3):261–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.