Coordination in a Digital Platform Organization

References

• Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alibaba (2015) Taobao turns shoppers into sales force for 12.12 event. Alizila News. Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
• Alt R, Zimmermann HD (2019) Electronic markets on platform competition. Electron. Marketing 29(2):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azorín M, Francisco J (2014) Microfoundations of strategic management: Toward micro–macro research in the resource-based theory. BRQ Bus. Res. Quart. 17(2):102–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Woodard JJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA, Rockmann KW (2010) Chutes vs. ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JAY, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg M (2016) The highest-paid YouTube stars 2016: Pewdiepie remains no. 1 with $15 million. Forbes (December 5), https://www.forbes.com/pictures/gjdm45ffed/1-pewdiepie/?sh=4fd33681346c.Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Bor S (2018) Why meta-organizations matter: A response to Lawton et al. and Spillman. J. Management Inquiry 27(2):204–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Dumez H (2016) The concept of meta‐organization: Issues for management studies. Eur. Management Rev. 13(2):149–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociol. Theory 7(1):14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2011) Dynamic price competition with network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinale I (2018) Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):132–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santaló J (2019) Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 30(3):617–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutolo D, Kenney M (2021) Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(4):584–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2018) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech. 33(1):124–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy DL (2005) Affiliate marketing and its impact on e-commerce. J. Consumer Marketing 22(3):161–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quart. 39(1):217–A212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2006) Platform-mediated networks: Definitions and core concepts. Harvard Business School Module Note 807-049. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=33529&source=post_page.Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Rev. Netw. Econom. 2(3):191–209.Google Scholar
• Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2008) Markets with two-sided platforms. Issues Competition Law Policy 1(28):667–693.Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2009) Platforms, markets and innovation: An introduction. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2021) Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Plann. 54(5):102045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2001) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2011) Micro-strategizing in platform ecosystems: A multiple case study Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2011, vol. 3. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/generaltopics/3.Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(2):71–80.Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Yehezkel Y (2013) Platform competition under asymmetric information. Amer. Econom. J. Microecon. 5(3):22–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2018) Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy 47(8):1391–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber TL, Kude T, Dibbern J (2017) Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):563–584.Link, Google Scholar
• Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. MIS Quart. 44(3):1177–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3):68–126.Google Scholar
• Ingram Bogusz C, Morisse M (2018) How infrastructures anchor open entrepreneurship: The case of Bitcoin and stigma. Inform. Systems J. 28(6):1176–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joyce E, Edinboro U (2022) Bourdieu’s practice theory as framework for grasping organizational change: A case study in China. AOM Annual Meeting Proc. 2022. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.13683abstract.Google Scholar
• Karanovic J, Berends H, Engel Y (2020) Regulated dependence: Platform workers’ responses to new forms of organizing. J. Management Stud. 58(4):1070–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koestler A (1967) The Ghost in the Machine (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Leiponen A, Schilling M, Vasudeva G (2022) Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management J. 43(3):405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leong C, Pan SL, Bahri S, Fauzi A (2019a) Social media empowerment in social movements: Power activation and power accrual in digital activism. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(2):173–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leong C, Pan SL, Leidner DE, Huang JS (2019b) Platform leadership: Managing boundaries for the network growth of digital platform. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(10):1531–1565.Google Scholar
• Li H, Kettinger WBJ (2021) The building blocks of software platforms: Understanding the past to forge the future. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1524–1555.Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang C, Kettinger WJ (2022) Digital platform ecosystem dynamics: The roles of product scope, innovation, and collaborative network centrality. MIS Quart. 46(2):739–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindgren R, Eriksson O, Lyytinen K (2015) Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. J. Inform. Tech. 30(3):229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malgonde O, Zhang H, Padmanabhan B, Limayem M (2020) Taming complexity in search matching: Two-sided recommender systems on digital platforms. MIS Quart. 44(1):49–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Crowston K (1990) What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? Proc. 1990 ACM Conf. Comput. Cooperative work (ACM, New York), 357–370.Google Scholar
• Marciniak R (2013) From organization design to meta organization design. Benghozi PJ, Krob D, Rowe F, eds. Digital Enterprise Design and Management 2013. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 205 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quart. 45(4):1999–2022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Baron RA (2021) On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: Role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 125:520–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parnas DL (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM. 15(12):1053–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M (2013) Interdependence and organization design. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization (Edward Elgar Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian R (2016) Celebrity economy set for explosive growth in China. China Daily, http://www.ecns.cn/business/2016/03-16/203077.shtml.Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Gopal A, Hann I-H (2017) Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):225–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Raghu G, Arun K (1995) Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. 16(S1):93–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2008) Competition policy in two-sided markets, with a special emphasis on payment cards. Buccirossi P, ed. Handbook of Antitrust Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 543–582.Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Holmström J, Lyytinen K (2020) Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: Evidence from the process automation industry. MIS Quart. 44(1):129–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimoni B (2017) What is resistance to change? A habitus-oriented approach. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(4):257–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staykova KS (2018) Managing platform ecosystem evolution through the emergence of micro-strategies and microstructures. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2018. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/innovation/Presentations/22.Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sun H, Fan M, Tan Y (2020) An empirical analysis of seller advertising strategies in an online marketplace. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):37–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Taj SA (2016) Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. Eur. Management J. 34(4):338–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tech Wire Asia (2019) China’s social media censorship is effective but disrupts advertisers. Tech Wire Asia, https://techwireasia.com/2019/04/is-chinas-social-media-censorship-actually-a-good-thing/.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2022) The all-conquering quave. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/07/07/whos-afraid-of-tiktok.Google Scholar
• Thomas LDW, Autio E, Gann DM (2014) Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson G (2003) Hierarchies, Markets, and Networks: A Preliminary Comparison Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Platform desertion by app developers. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):40–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Trabucchi D, Buganza T (2020) Fostering digital platform innovation: From two to multi‐sided platforms. Creat. Innov. Management 29(2):345–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual. Inq. 16(10):837–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tschang FT (2021) Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms? Acad. Management Perspect. 35(4):696–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne MW, Schrage M (2016) The best platforms are more than matchmakers. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2016/08/the-best-platforms-are-more-than-matchmakers.Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Paul Choudary S (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2016(April):54–60, 62.Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 4(2):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P (2021) Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MIS Quart. 45(1):397–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Z (2022) How China’s Biggest Online Influencers Fell from Their Thrones (MIT Technology Review). https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/06/10/1053598/austin-li-jiaqi-china-biggest-online-influencers-fell/.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1983) Organizations as institutions. Res. Sociol. Organ. 2(1):1–47.Google Scholar