Long-Range Social Influence in Phone Communication Networks on Offline Adoption Decisions

References

• Acemoglu D, Dahleh MA, Lobel I, Ozdaglar A (2011) Bayesian learning in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1201–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos A, Kumar R, Mahdian M (2008) Influence and correlation in social networks. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 7–15.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballester C, Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2006) Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player. Econometrica 74(5):1403–1417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Chandrasekhar AG, Duflo E, Jackson MO (2013) The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341(6144):1236498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Chandrasekhar AG, Duflo E, Jackson MO (2019) Using gossips to spread information: Theory and evidence from two randomized controlled trials. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(6):2453–2490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belo R, Ferreira P (2022) Free-riding in products with positive network externalities: Empirical evidence from a large mobile network. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(1):401–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Iyengar R (2013) Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. J. Consumer Res. 40(3):567–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch F, Jackson MO, Tebaldi P (2023) Centrality measures in networks. Soc. Choice Welfare 1–41.Google Scholar
• Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer AD, Marlow C, Settle JE, Fowler JH (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion vs. structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(6):1287–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2013) Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statist. Medicine 32(4):556–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Matos MG, Ferreira P, Krackhardt D (2014) Peer influence in the diffusion of iphone 3g over a large social network. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):1103–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• den Bulte CV, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion vs. marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Kinney ST (1998) Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. 9(3):256–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ho YJ, Ramaprasad J (2017) Popularity or proximity: Characterizing the nature of social influence in an online music community. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):117–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Niculescu MF, Wu D (2013) Engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):164–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckles D, Bakshy E (2021) Bias and high-dimensional adjustment in observational studies of peer effects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(534):507–517.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Li B, Liu S (2019) Mobile targeting using customer trajectory patterns. Management Sci. 65(11):5027–5049.Link, Google Scholar
• Golub B, Jackson MO (2010) Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(1):112–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover A, Leskovec J (2016) node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 855–864.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Yang S, Xu Y (2019) Understanding the social learning effect in contagious switching behavior. Management Sci. 65(10):4771–4794.Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2019) The friendship paradox and systematic biases in perceptions and social norms. J. Political Econom. 127(2):777–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J, Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2019) Love unshackled: Identifying the effect of mobile app adoption in online dating. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43:47–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 137–146.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Miguel E (2007) The illusion of sustainability. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1007–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Sella Y, Ruiz R, Pentland A (2020) Contextual centrality: Going beyond network structure. Sci. Rep. 10(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewbel A (2007) Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification. Econometrica 75(2):537–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X (2016) Could deal promotion improve merchants’ online reputations? The moderating role of prior reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Fan J, Wang Y, Tan KL (2018) Influence maximization on social graphs: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 30(10):1852–1872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu E (2019) Industrial policies in production networks. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):1883–1948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Peres R, Shachar R (2013) On brands and word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma L, Krishnan R, Montgomery AL (2015) Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network. Management Sci. 61(2):454–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Mallipeddi RR, Kumar S, Sriskandarajah C, Zhu Y (2022) A framework for analyzing influencer marketing in social networks: selection and scheduling of influencers. Management Sci. 68(1):75–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matous P, Todo Y, Ishikawa T (2014) Emergence of multiplex mobile phone communication networks across rural areas: An ethiopian experiment. Network Sci. 2(2):162–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (2001) Economic choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):351–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFowland E, III, Shalizi CR (2023) Estimating causal peer influence in homophilous social networks by inferring latent locations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 118(541):707–718.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobius M, Rosenblat T (2014) Social learning in economics. Annu. Rev. Econom. 6(1):827–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M (2018) Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Lurie NH, Liu H (2019) Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: how are mobile reviews different? Marketing Sci. 38(5):773–792.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao N, Mobius M, Rosenblat T (2007) Social networks and vaccination decisions. FRB of Boston Working Paper No. 07-12, Boston. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1073143.Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Ramaprasad J (2019) The effects of asymmetric social ties, structural embeddedness, and tie strength on online content contribution behavior. Management Sci. 65(7):3398–3422.Link, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2005) Observational Study (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica (New Series) 5(17):61–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen M (2014) How judicial qualification ratings may disadvantage minority and female candidates. J. Law Courts 2(1):33–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC (2011) Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart MB, Swaffield JK (2008) The other margin: do minimum wages cause working hours adjustments for low-wage workers? Economica 75(297):148–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A, Provost F, Oestreicher-Singer G, Aral S (2013) Research commentary: Information in digital, economic, and social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):883–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Suri S, Watts DJ (2011) Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS One 6(3):e16836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toole JL, Lin YR, Muehlegger E, Shoag D, González MC, Lazer D (2015) Tracking employment shocks using mobile phone data. J. Royal Soc. Interface 12(107):20150185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Pavlou PA, Krishnan R (2018) On direct vs. indirect peer influence in large social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):292–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the us kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li B, Luo X, Wang X (2019) Personalized mobile targeting with user engagement stages: Combining a structural hidden markov model and field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):787–804.Link, Google Scholar