Transporting Causal Effects Across Populations Using Structural Causal Modeling: An Illustration to Work-from-Home Productivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1236

References

  • Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 9(2):204–215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balke A, Pearl J (1997) Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92(439):1171–1176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bareinboim E, Pearl J (2012) Transportability of causal effects: Completeness results. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 698–704.Google Scholar
  • Bareinboim E, Pearl J (2016) Causal inference and the data-fusion problem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7345–7352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellemare MF, Bloem JR, Wexler N (2020) The paper of how: Estimating treatment effects using the front-door criterion. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryan CJ, Tipton E, Yeager DS (2021) Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behav. 5(8):980–989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Castro DC, Walker I, Glocker B (2020) Causality matters in medical imaging. Nature Comm. 11(1):3673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen LF, Vander Weg MW, Hofmann DA, Reisinger HS (2015) The Hawthorne effect in infection prevention and epidemiology. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology 36(12):1444–1450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cinelli C, Forney A, Pearl J (2022) A crash course in good and bad controls. Technical Report No. R-493, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Conger K (2020) Facebook starts planning for permanent remote workers. New York Times (May 21), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/technology/facebook-remote-work-coronavirus.html.Google Scholar
  • D’Attoma I, Camillo F, Clark MH (2019) A comparison of bias reduction methods: Clustering vs. propensity score subclassification and weighting. J. Experiment. Ed. 87(1):33–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deaton A, Cartwright N (2018) Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Soc. Sci. Medicine 210:2–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S, Kraemer KL (2000) Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. 46(4):548–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felstead A, Jewson N, Walters S (2003) Managerial control of employees working at home. British J. Indust. Relations 41(2):241–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman DA (2006) Statistical models for causation: What inferential leverage do they provide? Evaluation Rev. 30(6):691–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1524–1541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghobakhloo M, Hong TS, Sabouri MS, Zulkifli N (2012) Strategies for successful information technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information (Basel) 3(1):36–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hartman RI, Stoner CR, Arora R (1991) An investigation of selected variables affecting telecommuting productivity and satisfaction. J. Bus. Psych. 6(2):207–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckerman D, Meek C, Cooper G (2006) A Bayesian approach to causal discovery. Holmes DE, Jain LC, eds. Innovations in Machine Learning, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 194 (Springer, Berlin), 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hernán MA, Cole SR (2009) Invited commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias. Amer. J. Epidemiology 170(8):959–962.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khan R, Javed Hasan S (2020) Telecommuting: The problems & challenges during Covid-19 (2020). Internat. J. Engrg. Res. Tech. 9(7):1027–1033.Google Scholar
  • Kohli R, Devaraj S (2003) Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):127–145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kouw WM, Loog M (2018) An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learning. Technical report, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Kuroki M, Pearl J (2014) Measurement bias and effect restoration in causal inference. Biometrika 101(2):423–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Monica PR (2021) Morgan Stanley CEO to NYC workers: Be back in the office by September or else. CNN Bus. (June 17), https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/16/investing/morgan-stanley-ceo-return-to-office/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Li X, Grahl J, Hinz O (2022) How do recommender systems lead to consumer purchases? A causal mediation analysis of a field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):620–637.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin M, Lucas HC Jr, Shmueli G (2013) Research commentary—Too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):906–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lyttelton T, Zang E, Musick K (2020) Gender differences in telecommuting and implications for inequality at home and work. Preprint, submitted July 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645561.Google Scholar
  • Mansournia MA, Nazemipour M, Etminan M (2021) Causal diagrams for immortal time bias. Internat. J. Epidemiology 50(5):1405–1409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGue M, Osler M, Christensen K (2010) Causal inference and observational research: The utility of twins. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 5(5):546–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller CC (2020) The office will never be the same. That’s probably a good thing. New York Times (August 20), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/style/office-culture.html.Google Scholar
  • Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2009) From association to causation via a potential outcomes approach. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):295–313.Google Scholar
  • Morgan SL, Winship C (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Oliveira T, Martins MF (2010) Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries. Indust. Management Data Systems 110(9):1337–1354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osei-Bryson KM, Ko M (2004) Exploring the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance using regression splines analysis. Inform. Management 42(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (1998) Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 27(2):226–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2014) Interpretation and identification of causal mediation. Psych. Methods 19(4):459–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2018) Challenging the hegemony of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Soc. Sci. Medicine 210:60–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J, Bareinboim E (2014) External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations. Statist. Sci. 29(4):579–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J, Glymour M, Jewell NP (2016) Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer (Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
  • Peters J, Mooij JM, Janzing D, Schölkopf B (2014) Causal discovery with continuous additive noise models. J. Machine Learn. Res. 15(1):2009–2053.Google Scholar
  • Petersen AH, Osler M, Ekstrøm CT (2021) Data-driven model building for life-course epidemiology. Amer. J. Epidemiology 190(9):1898–1907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(1):221–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson J (2010) Managing flexworkers: Holding on and letting go. J. Management Development 29(2):137–147.Google Scholar
  • Ross JW, Beath CM (2002) Beyond the business case: New approaches to IT investment. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 43(2):22–23.Google Scholar
  • Rudolph KE, van der Laan MJ (2017) Robust estimation of encouragement-design intervention effects transported across sites. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B Statist. Methodological 79(5):1509–1525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolph KE, Levy J, van der Laan MJ (2021) Transporting stochastic direct and indirect effects to new populations. Biometrics 77(1):197–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolph KE, Levy J, Schmidt NM, Stuart EA, Ahern J (2020) Using transportability to understand differences in mediation mechanisms across trial sites of a housing voucher experiment. Epidemiology 31(4):523–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sattar N, Preiss D (2017) Reverse causality in cardiovascular epidemiological research: More common than imagined? Circulation 135(24):2369–2372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schockaert C (2020) A causal-based framework for multimodal multivariate time series validation enhanced by unsupervised deep learning as an enabler for industry 4.0. Preprint, submitted August 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.02171.Google Scholar
  • Shadish W, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Sharma P, Sarstedt M, Shmueli G, Kim KH, Thiele KO (2019) PLS-based model selection: The role of alternative explanations in information systems research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(4):346–397.Google Scholar
  • Shen X, Ma S, Vemuri P, Simon G (2020) Challenges and opportunities with causal discovery algorithms: Application to Alzheimer’s pathophysiology. Sci. Rep. 10(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  • Shimizu S, Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A, Kerminen A, Jordan M (2006) A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J. Machine Learn. Res. 7(10):2003–2030.Google Scholar
  • Song Y, Watson RT, Zhao X, Kelley N (2021) A causal model analysis approach to literature reviewing: A tutorial on the application of graph theory. Preprint, submitted June 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3870782.Google Scholar
  • Tafti A, Shmueli G (2020) Beyond overall treatment effects: Leveraging covariates in randomized experiments guided by causal structure. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1183–1199.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT (2016) Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: The R package ‘dagitty.’ Internat. J. Epidemiology 45(6):1887–1894.Google Scholar
  • Tian J, Pearl J (2012) On the testable implications of causal models with hidden variables. Darwiche A, Friedman N, eds. Proc. 18th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 519–527.Google Scholar
  • Tu R, Zhang K, Bertilson BC, Kjellström H, Zhang C (2019) Neuropathic pain diagnosis simulator for causal discovery algorithm evaluation. Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d’Alché-Buc F, Fox E, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1–12.Google Scholar
  • Valeri L, VanderWeele TJ (2013) Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psych. Methods 18(2):137–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verma TS, Pearl J (1990) Equivalence and synthesis of causal models. Bonissone PP, Henrion M, Kanal LN, Lemmer JF, eds. Proc. 6th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 220–227.Google Scholar
  • Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. 3(4):307–333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng Z, Pavlou PA (2010) Research note—Toward a causal interpretation from observational data: A new Bayesian networks method for structural models with latent variables. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):365–391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):61–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.