Editorial: Some Thoughts on Reviewing for Information Systems Research and Other Leading Information Systems Journals

References

• Agarwal R (2012) Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1087–1092.Link, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison D, Malaurent J (2014) Is theory king? Questioning the theory fetish in information systems. J. Inform. Tech. 29(4):327–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bannister F, Janssen M (2019) The art of scholarly reviewing: Principles and practices. Government Inform. Quart. 36(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedi J (1987) Drops and splashes. Accessed October 25, 2023, https://edgerton-digital-collections.org/stories/features/drop-of-water.Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Zmud R (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quart. 27(2):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Statist. Mechanics Theory Experiment 2008(10):P10008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davison RM (2015) The art of constructive reviewing. Inform. Systems J. 25(5):429–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1995) Comments on “what theory is not.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):391–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty DH, Glick WH (1994) Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Manage. Rev. 19(2):230–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G (2002) Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q‐r theory. J. Political Econom. 110(5):994–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagin A, Kendall-Taylor J, Bibbins-Domingo K (2023) Guidance for authors, peer reviewers, and editors on use of AI, language models, and chatbots. JAMA 330(8):702–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB (2014) The MISQ review system: Operational perspectives. MIS Quart. 38(4):iii–vii.Google Scholar
• Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30(3):611–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A (2018) Editorial—Traits of successful research contributions for publication in ISR: Some thoughts for authors and reviewers. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):779–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hosseini M, Horbach SPJM (2023) Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Res. Integrity Peer Rev. 8(1):4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Information Systems Research (2023a) Editorial statement. Accessed October 25, 2023, https://pubsonline.informs.org/page/isre/editorial-statement.Google Scholar
• Information Systems Research (2023b) Guidelines for ethical behavior in publishing. Accessed October 25, 2023, https://pubsonline.informs.org/page/isre/guidelines-for-ethical-behavior-in-publishing.Google Scholar
• Kock N (1999) A case of academic plagiarism. Comm. ACM 42(7):96–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kock N, Davison R (2003) Dealing with plagiarism in the information systems research community: A look at factors that drive plagiarism and ways to address them. MIS Quart. 27(4):511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Straub D (2011) Editor’s comments: How reviews shape “MIS Quarterly”: A primer for reviewers and editors. MIS Quart. 35(3):iii–vii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS (1995) Reviewing a manuscript for publication. J. Oper. Management 13(1):87–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Carte T, Chatterjee S, Chen D, Jones M, Preston D (2022) On civil critique: Reviewing for JAIS. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (2005) Developing theory about the development of theory. Smith KG, Hitt MA, eds. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molnar W, Nandhakumar J, Stacey P (2017) A paradox of progressive saturation: The changing nature of improvisation over time in a systems development project. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(11):814–836.Google Scholar
• Rai A (2016) Writing a virtuous review. MIS Quart. 40(3):iii–x.Google Scholar
• Rai A (2017) Diversity of design science research. MIS Quart. 41(1):iii–xviii.Google Scholar
• Rai A (2019) Developing virtuous reviewers. MIS Quart. 43(4):iii–vii.Google Scholar
• Safi M (2014) Journal accepts bogus paper requesting removal from mailing list. Guardian (November 25), https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/nov/25/journal-accepts-paper-requesting-removal-from-mailing-list.Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Alvesson M (2011) Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization. Organization 18(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S (2023) Editorial: Continuing on an inclusive path to scholarly excellence with renewed vigor. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):1–4.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X, Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T, Lee AS (2018) Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (part 1/2). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):752–774.Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Agarwal R, Goes P, Gregor S, Henfridsson O, Saunders C, Tan B (2015) Roles and responsibilities of a senior editor. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(9):i–xx.Google Scholar
• Saunders C (2005a) Editor’s comments: From the trenches: Thoughts on developmental reviewing. MIS Quart. 29(2):iii–xii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders C (2005b) Editor’s comments: Looking for diamond cutters. MIS Quart. 29(1):iii–viii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D (2009) Editor’s comments: Diamond mining or coal mining? Which reviewing industry are we in? MIS Quart. 33(2):iii–viii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Gopal R, Thatcher JB, Sarker S (2023) The Janus effect of generative AI: Charting the path for responsible conduct of scholarly activities in information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):399–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sørensen JB, Mitchell TR (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 4(2):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):385–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley EA (2023) Attendees at How to be an Effective Reviewer workshop (2016–2023). Accessed October 25, 2023, https://personal.lse.ac.uk/whitley/HowToBeAReviewerWorkshopAttendees.htm.Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhao X, Fang X, Chen B (2023) Proactive resource request for disaster response: A deep learning-based optimization model. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print September 6, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.2022.0125.Google Scholar