Voluntary Technology Sharing to Rivals

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1255

References

  • Adner R, Chen J, Zhu F (2020) Frenemies in platform markets: Heterogeneous profit foci as drivers of compatibility decisions. Management Sci. 66(6):2432–2451.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, He C (2018) Reference-dependent utility, product variety, and price competition. Management Sci. 64(9):4302–4316.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • August T, Chen W, Zhu K (2021) Competition among proprietary and open-source software firms: The role of licensing in strategic contribution. Management Sci. 67(5):3041–3066.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • August T, Shin H, Tunca TI (2013) Licensing and competition for services in open source software. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1068–1086.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • August T, Shin H, Tunca TI (2018) Generating value through open source: Software service market regulation and licensing policy. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):186–205.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bourreau M, Doğan P (2010) Cooperation in product development and process R&D between competitors. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(2):176–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourreau M, Doğan P, Manant M (2016) Size of RJVs with partial cooperation in product development. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 46:77–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Riordan MH (2007) Price and variety in the spokes model. Econom. J. 117(522):897–921.Google Scholar
  • Conner KR (1995) Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. 41(2):209–225.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(5):1133–1137.Google Scholar
  • Desai PS (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gao SY, Lim WS, Tang CS (2017) Entry of copycats of luxury brands. Marketing Sci. 36(2):272–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang H, Parker G, Tan Y, Xu H (2020) Altruism or shrewd business? Implications of technology openness on innovations and competition. MIS Quart. 44(3):1049–1071.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi YV, Reibstein DJ, Zhang ZJ (2016) Turf wars: Product line strategies in competitive markets. Marketing Sci. 35(1):128–141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamien MI, Muller E, Zang I (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5):1293–1306.Google Scholar
  • Li KJ (2019) Status goods and vertical line extensions. Production Oper. Management 28(1):103–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantovani A, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Sci. 62(2):534–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Niculescu MF, Wu DJ, Xu LZ (2018) Strategic intellectual property sharing: Competition on an open technology platform under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):498–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao RS, Schaefer R (2013) Conspicuous consumption and dynamic pricing. Marketing Sci. 32(5):786–804.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • ROHM.com (2018) ROHM and GaN Systems join forces for GaN power semiconductors. Accessed September 3, 2023, https://www.rohm.com/news-detail?news-title=rohm-and-gan-systems-join-forces-for-gan-power-semiconductors&defaultGroupId=false.Google Scholar
  • Sun B, Xie J, Cao HH (2004) Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. 23(2):243–254.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomadsen R (2012) Seeking an expanding competitor: How product line expansion can increase all firms’ profits. J. Marketing Res. 49(3):349–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volkswagen-Newsroom.com (2022a) E-mobility/ID Showcars. Accessed September 3, 2023, https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/id-showcars-3965.Google Scholar
  • Volkswagen-Newsroom.com (2022b) Volkswagen and Ford expand collaboration on MEB electric platform. Accessed September 3, 2023, https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/press-releases/volkswagen-and-ford-expand-collaboration-on-meb-electric-platform-7808.Google Scholar
  • Wilson LO, Norton JA (1989) Optimal entry timing for a product line extension. Marketing Sci. 8(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.