Where the Ball Starts Rolling? An Empirical Investigation into Initial Opinion Formation on Social Media Platforms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1589

References

  • Alba JW, Hasher L (1983) Is memory schematic? Psych. Bull. 93(2):203–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 13(3):219–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JR (2000) Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Baiyere A, Bauer JM, Constantiou I, Hardt D (2025) Fake news and true news assessment: The persuasive effect of discursive evidence in judging veracity. MIS Quart. 49(3):823–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal G, Thatcher J, Schuetz SW (2023) Where authorities fail and experts excel: Influencing internet users’ compliance intentions. Comput. Security 128:103164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bornstein RF, d’Agostino PR (1994) The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Soc. Cognition 12(2):103–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouadjenek MR, Hacid H, Bouzeghoub M (2016) Social networks and information retrieval, how are they converging? A survey, a taxonomy and an analysis of social information retrieval approaches and platforms. Inform. Systems 56:1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TK, Lee ZW, Skoumpopoulou D, Situmeang F (2024) Judging the wrongness of firms in social media firestorms: The heuristic and systematic information processing perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 25(2):463–500.Google Scholar
  • Cowan N (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(1):87–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwifatma A (2015) Everyone’s an expert: In the digital era, fakes need to be exposed. Conversation (blog) (January 28), https://theconversation.com/everyones-an-expert-in-the-digital-era-fakes-need-to-be-exposed-36616.Google Scholar
  • Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX).Google Scholar
  • Evans JSB, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazio RH (2014) Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. Petty RE, Krosnick JA, eds. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (Psychology Press, London), 247–282.Google Scholar
  • Gao Y, Rui H, Sun S (2023) The power of identity cues in text-based customer service: Evidence from Twitter. MIS Quart. 47(3):983–1014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao Y, Zhang MM, Rui H (2025) Can crowdchecking curb misinformation? Evidence from community notes. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print November 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1609.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27(1):51–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose D, Mudambi S, Kumar S, Srivastava J (2025) How to tell a (news) story? Quantifying the impact of news format and storytelling on engagement. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print November 13, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0650.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guernsey L (2000) Suddenly, everybody’s an expert. New York Times (February 3), https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/03/technology/suddenly-everybody-s-an-expert.html.Google Scholar
  • Heimbach I, Hinz O (2018) The impact of sharing mechanism design on content sharing in online social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):592–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kim A, Dennis AR (2019) Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quart. 43(3):1025–1040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim A, Moravec PL, Dennis AR (2019) Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: The effects of user and expert reputation ratings. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(3):931–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laato S, Islam AN, Islam MN, Whelan E (2020) What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 29(3):288–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis N, Rossmann C, de Bruijn G-J, Martinez LS (2022) Dual process models and information engagement: Testing effects of seeking, scanning, and trust in sources on attitudes toward marijuana. J. Comm. 72(1):59–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • London J Jr, Li S, Sun H (2022) Seems legit: An investigation of the assessing and sharing of unverifiable messages on online social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):978–1001.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maio GR, Verplanken B, Haddock G (2018) The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • McVee MB, Dunsmore K, Gavelek JR (2005) Schema theory revisited. Rev. Ed. Res. 75(4):531–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Modgil S, Singh RK, Gupta S, Dennehy D (2021) A confirmation bias view on social media induced polarisation during Covid-19. Inform. Systems Frontiers 20:1–25.Google Scholar
  • Moravec PL, Kim A, Dennis AR (2020) Appealing to sense and sensibility: System 1 and system 2 interventions for fake news on social media. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):987–1006.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moravec PL, Minas RK, Dennis AR (2019) Fake news on social media. MIS Quart. 43(4):1343–A1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moravec PL, Kim A, Dennis AR, Minas RK (2022) Do you really know if it’s true? How asking users to rate stories affects belief in fake news on social media. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):887–907.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nabity-Grover T, Matthews KD, Roth PL, Kwon Y, Thatcher JB (2025) Social media and political affiliation: How expressing hot-button opinions affects raters’ assessments of job applicants. Inform. Systems Res. 36(4):2375–2390.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Rand DG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (2012) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Petty RE, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR (1997) Attitudes and attitude change. Annu. Rev. Psych. 48(1):609–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pienta DA, Somanchi S, Vishwamitra N, Berente N, Thatcher JB (2025) Do crowds validate false data? Systematic distortion and affective polarization. MIS Quart. 49(1):347–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian B, Koh TK, Zhang X (2025) From anonymity to accountability: How virtual identity disclosure changes the quantity and quality of “likes”. Inform. Systems Res. 36(3):1926–1937.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruby M (2023) When did everyone become an expert on everything? Rubesletter (blog) (August 15), https://mattruby.substack.com/p/when-did-everyone-become-an-expert.Google Scholar
  • Rumelhart DE (2017) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Spiro R, Bruce B, Brewer W, eds. Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK), 33–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoenfeld AH (1983) Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Sci. 7(4):329–363.Google Scholar
  • Shirish A, Srivastava SC, Chandra S (2021) Impact of mobile connectivity and freedom on fake news propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country empirical examination. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 30(3):322–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin C, Sun Y, Fang Y, Lim K (2018) Exploring the dual-role of cognitive heuristics and the moderating effect of gender in microblog information credibility evaluation. Inform. Tech. People 31(3):741–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeng X, Wei L (2013) Social ties and user content generation: Evidence from Flickr. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.