Can Crowdchecking Curb Misinformation? Evidence from Community Notes

References

• Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(2):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen MR, Desai N, Namazi A, Leas E, Dredze M, Smith DM, Ayers JW (2024) Characteristics of X (formerly Twitter) community notes addressing COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 331(19):1670–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altay S, Hacquin AS, Mercier H (2022) Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation. New Media Soc. 24(6):1303–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Ichimura H (2016) Optimal bandwidth selection for the fuzzy regression discontinuity estimator. Econom. Lett. 141:103–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Ichimura H (2018) Simultaneous selection of optimal bandwidths for the sharp regression discontinuity estimator. Quant. Econom. 9(1):441–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arif A, Robinson JJ, Stanek SA, Fichet ES, Townsend P, Worku Z, Starbird K (2017) A closer look at the self-correcting crowd: Examining corrections in online rumors. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (ACM, New York), 155–168.Google Scholar
• Baccarella CV, Wagner TF, Kietzmann JH, McCarthy IP (2018) Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. Eur. Management J. 36(4):431–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borwankar S, Zheng J, Kannan KN (2022) Democratization of misinformation monitoring: The impact of Twitter’s Birdwatch program. Preprint, submitted October 15, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4236756.Google Scholar
• Borwankar S, Zheng J, Kannan K (2024) Unveiling the impact of privacy-preserving policies in crowd-based misinformation monitoring program. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1.Google Scholar
• Broniatowski DA, Simons JR, Gu J, Jamison AM, Abroms LC (2023) The efficacy of Facebook’s vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Adv. 9(37):eadh2132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Farrell MH, Titiunik R (2017) rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. Stata J. 17(2):372–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo MD, Jansson M, Ma X (2018) Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity. Stata J. 18(1):234–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draws T, La Barbera D, Soprano M, Roitero K, Ceolin D, Checco A, Mizzaro S (2022) The effects of crowd worker biases in fact-checking tasks. Proc. 2022 ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (ACM, New York), 2114–2124.Google Scholar
• Eisenegger M, Imhof K (2008) The true, the good and the beautiful: Reputation management in the media society. Zerfass A, Ruler B, Sriramesh K, eds. Public Relations Research: European and International Perspectives and Innovations (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany), 125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Duan W, Rui H (2022) Does social media accelerate product recalls? Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):954–977.Link, Google Scholar
• Garrett RK (2009) Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 14(2):265–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinberg N, Joseph K, Friedland L, Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D (2019) Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Science 363(6425):374–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Lee S (2025) A nudge to credible information as a countermeasure to misinformation: Evidence from Twitter. Inform. Systems Res. 36(1):621–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim A, Moravec PL, Dennis AR (2019) Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: The effects of user and expert reputation ratings. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(3):931–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozyreva A, Herzog SM, Lewandowsky S, Hertwig R, Lorenz-Spreen P, Leiser M, Reifler J (2023) Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120(7):e2210666120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazer DMJ, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, Metzger MJ, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359(6380):1094–1096.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US house elections. J. Econom. 142(2):675–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Ram S (2024) Explainable deep learning for false information identification: An argumentation theory approach. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):890–907.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky S, Ecker UK, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J (2012) Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 13(3):106–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econom. 142(2):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moravec PL, Kim A, Dennis AR, Minas RK (2022) Do you really know if it’s true? How asking users to rate stories affects belief in fake news on social media. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):887–907.Link, Google Scholar
• Mostagir M, Siderius J (2022) Learning in a post-truth world. Management Sci. 68(4):2860–2868.Link, Google Scholar
• Osmundsen M, Bor A, Vahlstrup PB, Bechmann A, Petersen MB (2021) Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 115(3):999–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos C (2010) Affect, social pressure and prosocial motivation: Field experimental evidence of the mobilizing effects of pride, shame and publicizing voting behavior. Political Behav. 32(3):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Rand DG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Bear A, Collins ET, Rand DG (2020) The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Sci. 66(11):4944–4957.Link, Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek J, Schneider CR, Dryhurst S, Kerr J, Freeman AL, Recchia G, Van Der Bles AM, Van Der Linden S (2020) Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 7(10):201199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salge C, Karahanna E, Thatcher JB (2022) Algorithmic processes of social alertness and social transmission: How bots disseminate information on Twitter. MIS Quart. 46(1):229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheufele DA, Krause NM (2019) Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(16):7662–7669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Blanchard SJ, Johar GV (2025) Who shares fake news? Uncovering insights from social media users’ post histories. J. Marketing Res. 62(2):316–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan G, Qiu L (2025) Examining unintended consequences of peer recognition on users’ fact-checking contributions on social media: Evidence from a natural experiment. Preprint, submitted March 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5088565.Google Scholar
• Shan G, Wattal S, Thatcher JB (2022) How does anonymizing crowdsourced users’ identity affect fact-checking on social media platforms? A regression discontinuity analysis. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 13. Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB (1993) It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J. Educational Behav. Statist. 18(2):155–195.Google Scholar
• Talwar S, Dhir A, Kaur P, Zafar N, Alrasheedy M (2019) Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. J. Retailing Consumer Services 51:72–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang H, Lenzini G, Greiff S, Rohles B, Sergeeva A (2024) “Who knows? Maybe it really works”: Analysing users’ perceptions of health misinformation on social media. Proc. 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conf. (ACM, New York), 1499–1517.Google Scholar
• Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei X, Zhang Z, Zhang M, Chen W, Dajun Zeng D (2022) Combining crowd and machine intelligence to detect false news on social media. MIS Quart. 46(2):977–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Hou J, Gao Y, Chen PY (2025) How does crowdsourced fact-checking approach tackling misinformation affect audience engagement? Evidence from Twitter’s community notes program. Proc. 58th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu), 6549–6556.Google Scholar