When Vulnerability Drives Action: Designing Forward-Looking Frameworks for Disaster Preparedness

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1683

References

  • Abbasi A, Dillon R, Rao HR, Liu Sheng OR (2024a) Preparedness and response in the century of disasters: Overview of information systems research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):460–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbasi A, Parsons J, Pant G, Liu Sheng OR, Sarker S (2024b) Pathways for design research on artificial intelligence. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):441–459.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergstra J, Bengio Y (2012) Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 13(1):281–305.Google Scholar
  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45:5–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Krishnapuram B, Shah M, eds. Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 785–794.Google Scholar
  • Chen YD, Brown SA, Hu PJH, King CC, Chen H (2011) Managing emerging infectious diseases with information systems: Reconceptualizing outbreak management through the lens of loose coupling. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):447–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Rao HR, Sharman R, Upadhyaya SJ, Kim J (2010) An empirical examination of IT-enabled emergency response: The cases of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 26(8):141–156.Google Scholar
  • Comfort LK (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Admin. Rev. 67(s1):189–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Quart. 84(2):242–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dacy DC, Kunreuther H (1969) Economics of Natural Disasters; Implications for Federal Policy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2021) National risk index: Technical documentation. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/technical-documentation.Google Scholar
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2022) Social vulnerability. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/social-vulnerability.Google Scholar
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2024a) OpenFEMA dataset: Disaster declarations summaries - v2. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/openfema-data-page/disaster-declarations-summaries-v2.Google Scholar
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2024b) OpenFEMA dataset: Individuals and households program - Valid registrations - v2. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/openfema-data-page/individuals-and-households-program-valid-registrations-v2.Google Scholar
  • Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B (2011) A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J. Homeland Security Emergency Management 8(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Lee HA, Oh W, Son Y (2024) Leveraging the digital tracing alert in virus fight: The impact of COVID-19 cell broadcast on population movement. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):570–589.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quart. 37(2):337–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguin-Veras J, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Perez N, Wachtendorf T (2012) On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J. Oper. Management 30(7–8):494–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023) Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacovi A, Goldberg Y (2020) Towards faithfully interpretable NLP systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness? Jurafsky D, Chai J, Schluter N, Tetreault J, eds. Proc. 58th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 4198–4205.Google Scholar
  • Kind AJH, Buckingham WR (2018) Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible—The neighborhood atlas. New England J. Medicine 378(26):2456–2458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J (2024) After Hurricane Beryl, cooling centers were few and slow to arrive for Houstonians of color—Some died of heat exposure. Texas Observer. Accessed August 28, 2025, https://www.texasobserver.org/hurricane-beryl-cooling-centers-heat/.Google Scholar
  • Leidner DE, Pan G, Pan SL (2009) The role of IT in crisis response: Lessons from the SARS and Asian Tsunami disasters. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 18(2):80–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyons DJ (2014) The impact of inventory leanness and slack resources on supply chain resilience: An empirical study. Thesis, Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Marin-Ferrer M, Vernaccini L, Poljansek K (2017) INFORM index for risk management: Concept and methodology version 2017. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  • Mendonça D, Jefferson T, Harrald J (2007) Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management. Comm. ACM 50(3):44–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mousavi R, Gu B (2024) Resilience messaging: The effect of governors’ social media communications on community compliance during a public health crisis. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):505–527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Our World in Data (2022) Number of recorded natural disaster events. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-natural-disaster-events.Google Scholar
  • Parsons M, Morley P (2017) The Australian natural disaster resilience index. Australian J. Emergency Management 32(2):20–22.Google Scholar
  • Roberts DR, Bahn V, Ciuti S, Boyce MS, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Hauenstein S, et al. (2017) Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40(8):913–929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sakurai M, Murayama Y (2019) Information technologies and disaster management—Benefits and issues. Progress Disaster Sci. 2:100012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2008) A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal. 28(4):1099–1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schryen G, Rauchecker G, Comes T (2015) Resource planning in disaster response: Decision support models and methodologies. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 57(4):243–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh JV (1986) Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. 29(3):562–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spielman SE, Tuccillo J, Folch DC, Schweikert A, Davies R, Wood N, Tate E (2020) Evaluating social vulnerability indicators: Criteria and their application to the Social Vulnerability Index. Natl. Hazards 100(1):417–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas DS, Phillips BD, Lovekamp WE, Fothergill A (2013) Social Vulnerability to Disasters (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tremblay MC, Kohli R, Rivero C (2023) Data is the new protein: How the Commonwealth of Virginia built digital resilience muscle and rebounded from opioid and COVID shocks. MIS Quart. 47(1):423–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.undrr.org/implementing-sendai-framework/what-sendai-framework.Google Scholar
  • Varma S, Simon R (2006) Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1):91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White GF, Haas JE (1975) Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  • Yan B, Mai F, Wu C, Chen R, Li X (2024) A computational framework for understanding firm communication during disasters. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):590–608.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.