The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research

References

• Aaltonen A, Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2021) The making of data commodities: Data analytics as an embedded process. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(2):401–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Sarker S, Chiang R (2016) Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(2), 10.17705/1jais.00423.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A (2022) The economics of privacy at a crossroads. Goldfarb A, Tucker CE, eds. The Economics of Privacy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2021) Managing by data: Algorithmic categories and organizing. Organ. Stud. 42(9):1385–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2022) Organizations decentered: Data objects, technology and knowledge. Organ. Sci. 33(1):19–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2024) Data Rules: Reinventing the Market Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Gentzkow M, Song L (2022) Digital addiction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(7):2424–2463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson AW, Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Lowry KP, Elmore JG, Buist DSM, Hofvind S, Lee CI (2022) Independent external validation of artificial intelligence algorithms for automated interpretation of screening mammography: A systematic review. J. Amer. Coll. Radiol. 19(2, Part A):259–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Aschenbrenner L (2024) Situational awareness: The decade ahead. Accessed September 23, 2024, https://situational-awareness.ai/.Google Scholar
• Ashley KD (2017) Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baesens B, Bapna R, Marsden JR, Vanthienen J, Zhao JL (2016) Transformational issues of big data and analytics in networked business. MIS Quart. 40(4):807–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baiyere A, Grover V, Lyytinen KJ, Woerner S, Gupta A (2023) Digital “x”—Charting a path for digital-themed research. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):464–486.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2022) Overcoming the coordination problem in new marketplaces via cryptographic tokens. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1368–1385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C (2024) Design Rules, Volume 2: How Technology Shapes Organizations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville RL, Myers MD, Yoo Y (2020) Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quart. 44(2):509–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucherel K (2020) Blockchain Hurricane (Business Expert Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Becker SJ, Nemat AT, Lucas S, Heinitz RM, Klevesath M, Charton JE (2023) A code of digital ethics: Laying the foundation for digital ethics in a science and technology company. AI Soc. 38(6):2629–2639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Begenau J, Farboodi M, Veldkamp L (2018) Big data in finance and the growth of large firms. J. Monetary Econom. 97:71–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benzell SG, Hersh J, Alstyne M (2024) How APIs create growth by inverting the firm. Management Sci. 70(10):7120–7141.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Seidel S, Safadi H (2019) Research commentary—Data-driven computationally intensive theory development. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):50–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boxell L, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2017) Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics. NBER Working Paper No. 23258, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Brusoni S (2001) Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 10(1):179–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Handel BR, Jimenez R, Roth C (2023) When product markets become collective traps: The case of social media. NBER Working Paper No. 31771, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Lee D, Chen Z (2024) The consequences of generative AI for online knowledge communities. Sci. Rep. 14(1):10413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castells M (2002) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2021) Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Kretschmer T, Constantinides P, Alaimo C, Santalo J (2023) Digital platforms regulation: An innovation-centric view of the EU’s Digital Markets Act. J. Eur. Competition Law Practice 14(1):44–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1977) The Visible Hand (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Sarker S (2013) Infusing ethical considerations in knowledge management scholarship: Toward a research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(8), 10.17705/1jais.00339.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang RHL, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quart. 36(4):1165–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. 3:1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E, Mollick ER, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Kellogg K, Rajendran S, Krayer L, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2023) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Preprint, submitted September 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321.Google Scholar
• Dixon C (2024) Read Write Own: Building the Next Era of the Internet (Random House Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Hauser OP (2024) Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Sci. Adv. 10(28):eadn5290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dourish P (2001) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dourish P, Gómez Cruz E (2018) Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data Soc. 5(2):205395171878408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellinger EW, Gregory RW, Mini T, Widjaja T, Henfridsson O (2024) Skin in the game: The transformational potential of decentralized autonomous organizations. MIS Quart. 48(1):245–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkner P, Runde J (2013) Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Quart. 37(3):803–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkner P, Runde J (2019) Theorizing the digital object. MIS Quart. 43(4):1279–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishman S, McLarty M (2024) Unbundling the Enterprise: APIs, Optionality, and the Science of Happy Accidents (IT Revolution, Portland, OR).Google Scholar
• Frenken K, Fuenfschilling L (2020) The rise of online platforms and the triumph of the corporation. Sociologica 14(3):101–113.Google Scholar
• Friedman TL (2017) Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations (Version 2.0, with a New Afterword) (Picador, London).Google Scholar
• Fürstenau D, Baiyere A, Schewina K, Schulte-Althoff M, Rothe H (2023) Extended generativity theory on digital platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1686–1710.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Ganguly D, Iyengar S, Chaudhary V, Kalyanaraman S (2024) Proof of thought: Neurosymbolic program synthesis allows robust and interpretable reasoning. Preprint, submitted September 25, http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17270.Google Scholar
• Gerlitz C, Helmond A (2013) The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media Soc. 15(8):1348–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillespie T (2010) The politics of ‘platforms.’ New Media Soc. 12(3):347–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giustiziero G, Kretschmer T, Somaya D, Wu B (2023) Hyperspecialization and hyperscaling: A resource-based theory of the digital firm. Strategic Management J. 44(6):1391–1424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleick J (2011) The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2024) The Economics of Privacy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Grabher G (2020) Enclosure 4.0: Seizing data, selling predictions, scaling platforms. Sociologica 14(3):241–265.Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Beck R, Henfridsson O, Yaraghi N (2024) Cooperation among strangers: Algorithmic enforcement of reciprocal exchange with blockchain-based smart contracts. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print, July 2, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0023.Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou H (2021) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):534–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou H (2022) Data network effects: Key conditions, shared data, and the data value duality. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):189–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Kaganer E, Henfridsson O, Ruch TJ (2018) IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quart. 42(4):1225–1229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. MIS Quart. 39(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Lyytinen K (2023) The pursuit of innovative theory in the digital age. J. Inform. Tech. 38(1):45–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Chiang RHL, Liang TP, Zhang D (2018) Creating strategic business value from big data analytics: A research framework. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):388–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2023) Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage. RAND J. Econom. 54(4):638–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yıldırım P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Levina N, Min S (2024) Digitization of transaction terms within TCE: Strong smart contract as a new mode of transaction governance. MIS Quart. 48(2):825–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Polit. Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (2007) Incomplete contracts and ownership: Some new thoughts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):182–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson C, Venkatraman N (1999) Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems J. 38(2–3):472–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Nandhakumar J, Scarbrough H, Panourgias N (2018) Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Inform. Organ. 28(2):89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ (2022) Extending digital ventures through templating. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):285–310.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ, Newell S (2017) Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. MIS Quart. 41:301–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Lakhani KR (2020) Competing in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Istrate R, Tulus V, Grass RN, Vanbever L, Stark WJ, Guillén-Gosálbez G (2024) The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption. Nature Commun. 15(1):3724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2024) Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures. Res. Policy 53(1):104906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S, Markus ML (2018) Genetic platforms and their commercialization: Three tales of digital entrepreneurship. Bui T, ed. Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (University of Hawaii, Hilo, HI), 4574–4583.Google Scholar
• Jones CI, Tonetti C (2020) Nonrivalry and the economics of data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2819–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J (1999) Computer-based technology and the constitution of work: A study on the cognitive foundations of work. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. 9(4):261–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J (2007) The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Tempini N (2014) Patient data as medical facts: Social media practices as a foundation for medical knowledge creation. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):817–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2010) A theory of digital objects. First Monday 15(6).Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karhu K, Heiskala M (2024) Positive, negative, and amplified network externalities in platform markets. Acad. Management Perspect. 38(3):349–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Khan LM (2017) Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law J. 126:710–805.Google Scholar
• Kitchens B, Johnson SL, Gray P (2020) Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quart. 44(4):1619–1649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Raghavan M (2021) Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(22):e2018340118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krasnova H, Widjaja T, Buxmann P, Wenninger H, Benbasat I (2015) Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN (2002) Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 49:19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsh JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard Business School, Division of Research, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási AL, Brewer D, Christakis N, et al. (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723.Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Berente N (2012) Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1428–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Recker J, Yoo Y, Rosenkranz C (2022) Designing digital market offerings: How digital ventures navigate the tension between generative digital technology and the current environment. MIS Quart. 46(3):1453–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehrer C, Wieneke A, vom Brocke J, Jung R, Seidel S (2018) How big data analytics enables service innovation: Materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):424–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2010) Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday 15(6).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorenz J, Kruse LC, Recker J (2024) Creating and capturing value with physical-digital experiential consumer offerings. J. Management Inform. Systems 41(3):779–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K (2022) Innovation logics in the digital era: A systemic review of the emerging digital innovation regime. Innovation 24(1):13–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2002) Research commentary: The next wave of nomadic computing. Inform. Systems Res. 13(4):377–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr (2016) Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Systems J. 26(1):47–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D (2021) Trading at the Speed of Light: How Ultrafast Algorithms Are Transforming Financial Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML (2017) Datification, organizational strategy, and IS research: What’s the score? J. Strategic Inform. Systems 26(3):233–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miranda S, Berente N, Seidel S, Safadi H, Burton-Jones A (2022) Computationally intensive theory construction: A primer for authors and reviewers. MIS Quart. 46(2):i–xvi.Google Scholar
• Mitchell M (2019) Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne M, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmiggiani E, Monteiro E (2019) Digitized coral reefs. Vertesi J, Ribes D, eds. digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 300–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnas DL (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM 15(12):1053–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1963) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Rodriguez J, Grover V (2022) Digital strategic initiatives and digital resources: Construct definition and future research directions. MIS Quart. 46(4):2289–2316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pigou AC (1924) The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Power M (2022) Theorizing the economy of traces: From audit society to surveillance capitalism. Organ. Theory 3(4–6).Google Scholar
• Recker J, Lukyanenko R, Jabbari M, Samuel BM, Castellanos A (2021) From representation to mediation: A new agenda for conceptual modeling research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 45(1):269–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritala P, Ruokonen M, Ramaul L (2024) Transforming boundaries: How does ChatGPT change knowledge work? J. Bus. Strategy 45(3):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez J, Piccoli G (2018) Uncovering the digital “x” phenomena in the IS field: A text analysis approach. Pucihar A, Kljajić Borštnar M, Ravesteijn P, Seitz J, Bons R, eds. 31st Bled eConf. Digital Transformation: Meeting Challenges (Bled, Slovenia), 455–462.Google Scholar
• Rong K, Sokol DD, Zhou D, Zhu F (2024) Antitrust platform regulation and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. Preprint, submitted January 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4697283.Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17:63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaefer M, Sapi G (2023) Complementarities in learning from data: Insights from general search. Inform. Econom. Policy 65:101063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1983) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Tech. J. 27(3):379–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Smith BC (2019) The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark D, Pais I (2020) Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14(3):47–72.Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson EB (2020) How information systems came to rule the world: Reflections on the information systems field. Inform. Soc. 36(2):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson E (2021) When data becomes infrastructure and our lives depend on it. ECIS 2021 Research Papers, Association for Information Systems, Marrakesh, Morocco.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2018) Network effects and market power. What have we learned in the last decade? Antitrust 32(2):72–79.Google Scholar
• Tumbas S, Berente N, vom Brocke J (2018) Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. J. Inform. Tech. 33(3):188–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuomi I (2002) Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Um S, Zhang B, Wattal S, Yoo Y (2023) Software components and product variety in a platform ecosystem: A dynamic network analysis of WordPress. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1339–1374.Link, Google Scholar
• United States of America et al. v. Google LLC (2024).Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Pinsonneault A (2021) When digital technologies enable and threaten occupational identity: The delicate balancing act of data scientists. MIS Quart. 45(3):1087–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M (2023) Free speech and the fake news problem. Preprint, submitted April 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4414261.Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E, Madnick S (1995) Why not one big database? Principles for data ownership. Decision Support Systems 15(4):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne MWV, Petropoulos G, Parker G, Martens B (2021) “In situ” data rights. Commun. ACM 64(12):34–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M, Parker G, Gawer A, Tiwana A, Zhu F (2024) MISQ research curation on platforms and ecosystems. Accessed October 3, 2024, https://www.misqresearchcurations.org/blog/2024/6/22/platforms-and-ecosystems.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2010) Computer mediated transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2014) Beyond big data. Bus. Econom. 49(1):27–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verganti R (2009) Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• von Neumann J (1945) First draft of a report on the EDVAC. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Waardenburg L, Huysman M, Sergeeva AV (2022) In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king: Knowledge brokerage in the age of learning algorithms. Organ. Sci. 33(1):59–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang P (2021) Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MIS Quart. 45(1):397–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Boudreau MC, Chen AJ (2010) Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quart. 34(1):23–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiser M (1991) Ubiquitous computing, 1996 ( http://www.ubiq.com/ubicomp/, 5.5. 06). Vgl. auch Mark Weiser: The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American:94–100.Google Scholar
• Wessel L, Baiyere A, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cha J, Blegind-Jensen T (2021) Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(1):102–129.Google Scholar
• Wheeler T (2024) Crossing the regulatory Rubicon: The future of digital regulation is being defined in Europe. Brookings (June 7), https://www.brookings.edu/articles/crossing-the-regulatory-rubicon-the-future-of-digital-regulation-is-being-defined-in-europe/.Google Scholar
• Woodard CJ (2008) Platform competition in digital systems: Architectural control and value migration (2008). 1–38. Research Collection School of Information Systems (2008), Singapore Management University, Singapore, 235–251.Google Scholar
• Yates J (1993) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (JHU Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2010) Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. 34(2):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2012) Digital materiality and the emergence of an evolutionary science of the artificial. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 134–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2013) The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(5):227–236.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2024) Matter, signs, bits, and vectors: Cognitive emancipation and material limitation in the era of AI. Presentation, A Keynote Presentation for The 14th Organization, Artifacts, and Practice Workshop, Paris.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21:724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Lee H, Yoo Y, Choi Y (2022) Theorizing routines with computational sequence analysis: A critical realism framework. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(2):589–630.Google Scholar
• Zhou E, Lee D (2024) Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus 3(3):pgae052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform‐based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, Inc., New York).Google Scholar