How Costs Influence Preferences for Control in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): Human-Guided vs. GenAI-Based Delegated Search

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2025.1836

References

  • Al Balawi R, Hu Y, Qiu L (2023) Brand crisis and customer relationship management on social media: Evidence from a natural experiment from the airline industry. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):442–462.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Du J, Shin W (2024) Pricing strategy of competing media platforms. Marketing Sci. 43(3):469–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baird A, Maruping LM (2021) The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Quart. 45(1):315–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian S, Bhattacharya S, Krishnan VV (2015) Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 34(2):218–234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boussioux L, Lane JN, Zhang M, Jacimovic V, Lakhani KR (2024) The crowdless future? Generative AI and creative problem-solving. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1571–1955. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, et al. (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H, eds. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1877–1901.Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond L (2025) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Google Scholar
  • Chou C, Kumar V (2024) Estimating demand for subscription products: Identification of willingness to pay without price variation. Marketing Sci. 43(4):779–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Das S, Du AY, Gopal R, Ramesh R (2011) Risk management and optimal pricing in online storage grids. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):756–773.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E, Mollick ER, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Kellogg K, Rajendran S, Krayer L, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2026) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Organ. Sci. 37(2):403–423.Google Scholar
  • Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Du AY, Das S, Ramesh R (2013) Efficient risk hedging by dynamic forward pricing: A study in cloud computing. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(4):625–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glikson E, Woolley AW (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldman Sachs (2023) Generative AI could raise global GDP by 7%. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/generative-ai-could-raise-global-gdp-by-7-percent.html.Google Scholar
  • Guggenberger T, Lämmermann L, Urbach N, Walter A, Hofmann P (2023) Task delegation from AI to humans: A principal-agent perspective. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2023 Proc. (Hyderabad, India), 13.Google Scholar
  • Hendrickx L, Vlek C (1991) Perceived control, nature of risk information and risk taking. An experimental test of a simple taxonomy of uncertainty. J. Behav. Decision Making 4(4):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosseini L, Tang S, Mookerjee V, Sriskandarajah C (2020) A switch in time saves the dime: A model to reduce rental cost in cloud computing. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):753–775.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hou J(J), Wang L, Wang G, Wang HJ, Yang S (2025) The double-edged roles of generative AI in the creative process: Experiments on design work. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print October 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0937. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S, Deodhar SJ (2022) Social mechanisms in crowdsourcing contests: A literature review. Behav. Inform. Tech. 41(5):1080–1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2021a) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):547–730. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang JA, Wade K, Fiesler C, Brubaker JR (2021b) Supporting serendipity: Opportunities and challenges for human-AI collaboration in qualitative analysis. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, vol. 5, issue CSCW1 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), article number 94.Google Scholar
  • Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, Madriaga M, et al. (2023) Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health 2(2):e0000198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu CW, Jiang S, Liu X, Duan J (2024) Empowering generative AI: The art of crafting effective prompts through social learning. Preprint, submitted November 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4995107.Google Scholar
  • Ma D, Seidmann A (2015) Analyzing software as a service with per-transaction charges. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):360–378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mukherjee S (2024) Klarna using GenAI to cut marketing costs by $10 mln annually. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.reuters.com/technology/klarna-using-genai-cut-marketing-costs-by-10-mln-annually-2024-05-28.Google Scholar
  • Noy S, Zhang W (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381:187–192.Google Scholar
  • Peng S, Kalliamvakou E, Cihon P, Demirer M (2023) The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot. Preprint, submitted February 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590.Google Scholar
  • Pratt M (2023) Generative AI’s sustainability problems explained. TechTarget (September 17), https://www.techtarget.com/sustainability/feature/Generative-AIs-sustainability-problems-explained. Google Scholar
  • Susarla A, Gopal R, Thatcher JB, Sarker S (2023) The Janus effect of generative AI: Charting the path for responsible conduct of scholarly activities in information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):399–408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Svensson B, Keller C (2024) Agentic relationship dynamics in human-AI collaboration: A study of interactions with GPT-based agentic information systems artifacts. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS-57) (Honolulu, Hawaii), 2.Google Scholar
  • Vanian J, Leswing K (2023) ChatGPT and generative AI are booming, but the costs can be extraordinary. CNBC (March 13), https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/chatgpt-and-generative-ai-are-booming-but-at-a-very-expensive-price.html.Google Scholar
  • Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. Guyon I, Von Luxburg U, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Proc. 31st Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Long Beach, CA), 6000–6010.Google Scholar
  • Vincent J (2023) AI image generator Midjourney stops free trials but says influx of new users to blame. Verge (March 30), https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/30/23662940/deepfake-viral-ai-misinformation-midjourney-stops-free-trials.Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2016) CROSSROADS—Identifying viable “need–solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organ. Sci. 27(1):207–221.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Chiew V (2010) On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Res. 11(1):81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Yang M, Sun T (2023) Human-AI co-creation in product ideation: The dual view of quality and diversity. Preprint, submitted December 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4668241.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman M (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu S, Liu Q, Zhao X, Sun B, Liao X (2024) Attracting solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing contests: The role of linguistic signals in task descriptions. Inform. Systems J. 34(1):6–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xia L, Monroe KB, Cox JL (2004) The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. J. Marketing 68(4):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ye HJ, Kankanhalli A (2015) Investigating the antecedents of organizational task crowdsourcing. Inform. Management 52(1):98–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou E, Lee D (2024) Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus 3(3):pgae052. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.