How Costs Influence Preferences for Control in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): Human-Guided vs. GenAI-Based Delegated Search
References
- (2023) Brand crisis and customer relationship management on social media: Evidence from a natural experiment from the airline industry. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):442–462.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Pricing strategy of competing media platforms. Marketing Sci. 43(3):469–496.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Quart. 45(1):315–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 34(2):218–234.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) The crowdless future? Generative AI and creative problem-solving. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1571–1955. Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H, eds. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1877–1901.Google Scholar
- (2025) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Google Scholar
- (2024) Estimating demand for subscription products: Identification of willingness to pay without price variation. Marketing Sci. 43(4):779–816.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Risk management and optimal pricing in online storage grids. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):756–773.Link, Google Scholar
- (2026) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Organ. Sci. 37(2):403–423.Google Scholar
- (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Efficient risk hedging by dynamic forward pricing: A study in cloud computing. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(4):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Goldman Sachs (2023) Generative AI could raise global GDP by 7%. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/generative-ai-could-raise-global-gdp-by-7-percent.html.Google Scholar
- (2023) Task delegation from AI to humans: A principal-agent perspective. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2023 Proc. (Hyderabad, India), 13.Google Scholar
- (1991) Perceived control, nature of risk information and risk taking. An experimental test of a simple taxonomy of uncertainty. J. Behav. Decision Making 4(4):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A switch in time saves the dime: A model to reduce rental cost in cloud computing. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):753–775.Link, Google Scholar
- (2025) The double-edged roles of generative AI in the creative process: Experiments on design work. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print October 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0937. Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Social mechanisms in crowdsourcing contests: A literature review. Behav. Inform. Tech. 41(5):1080–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021a) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):547–730. Link, Google Scholar
- (2021b) Supporting serendipity: Opportunities and challenges for human-AI collaboration in qualitative analysis. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, vol. 5, issue CSCW1 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), article number 94.Google Scholar
- (2023) Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health 2(2):e0000198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Empowering generative AI: The art of crafting effective prompts through social learning. Preprint, submitted November 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4995107.Google Scholar
- (2015) Analyzing software as a service with per-transaction charges. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):360–378.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Klarna using GenAI to cut marketing costs by $10 mln annually. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.reuters.com/technology/klarna-using-genai-cut-marketing-costs-by-10-mln-annually-2024-05-28.Google Scholar
- (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381:187–192.Google Scholar
- (2023) The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot. Preprint, submitted February 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590.Google Scholar
- (2023) Generative AI’s sustainability problems explained. TechTarget (September 17), https://www.techtarget.com/sustainability/feature/Generative-AIs-sustainability-problems-explained. Google Scholar
- (2023) The Janus effect of generative AI: Charting the path for responsible conduct of scholarly activities in information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):399–408.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Agentic relationship dynamics in human-AI collaboration: A study of interactions with GPT-based agentic information systems artifacts. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS-57) (Honolulu, Hawaii), 2.Google Scholar
- (2023) ChatGPT and generative AI are booming, but the costs can be extraordinary. CNBC (March 13), https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/chatgpt-and-generative-ai-are-booming-but-at-a-very-expensive-price.html.Google Scholar
- (2017) Attention is all you need. Guyon I, Von Luxburg U, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Proc. 31st Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Long Beach, CA), 6000–6010.Google Scholar
- (2023) AI image generator Midjourney stops free trials but says influx of new users to blame. Verge (March 30), https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/30/23662940/deepfake-viral-ai-misinformation-midjourney-stops-free-trials.Google Scholar
- (2016) CROSSROADS—Identifying viable “need–solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organ. Sci. 27(1):207–221.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Res. 11(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Human-AI co-creation in product ideation: The dual view of quality and diversity. Preprint, submitted December 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4668241.Google Scholar
- (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Attracting solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing contests: The role of linguistic signals in task descriptions. Inform. Systems J. 34(1):6–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. J. Marketing 68(4):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- 2015) Investigating the antecedents of organizational task crowdsourcing. Inform. Management 52(1):98–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus 3(3):pgae052. Crossref, Google Scholar

