Computer Industry Executives: An Analysis of the New Barons' Compensation
Published Online:1 Dec 1998https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.4.398
References
- An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. J. Accounting Res. (1986) 24:1–39Crossref, Google Scholar
- Compensation practices in high-technology industries. Personnel Administration (1985) June):111–123Google Scholar
- Pay, performance and turnover in bank CEOs. J. Labor Econom. (1990) 8:448–481Crossref, Google Scholar
- Performance and corporate control: What motivates CEOs and other top executives in Israel? Econom. Quart. (1997) 44:171–192Google Scholar
- The big picture (1997) 8Business Week December 15Google Scholar
- The determinants of executive salaries: An econometric survey. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1980) 62:7–13Crossref, Google Scholar
- Executive compensation, managerial turnover and firm performance: An empirical investigation. J. Accounting Econom. (1985) 7:43–66Crossref, Google Scholar
- Corporate governance, CEO compensation, and firm performance. (1997) . University of Pennsylvania Working paper, MarchGoogle Scholar
- Interindustry differences in the relation between compensation and firm performance variables. J. Accounting Res. (1991) 29:37–58Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100:468–505Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:175–193Crossref, Google Scholar
- Pay dispersion within top management groups: Evidence of its harmful effects on performance of high technology firms. (1997) . Working paper, Columbia University, New York, AprilGoogle Scholar
- Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:575–606Crossref, Google Scholar
- CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:707–717Crossref, Google Scholar
- CEO pay and firm performance: Dynamics, asymmetries, and alternative performance measures. (1994) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA, DecemberGoogle Scholar
- Managerial ownership and firm performance: Incentives or rewards? Adv. in Financial Econom. (1996) 2:119–149Google Scholar
- Firm size and executive compensation. J. Human Resources (1990) 25:90–105Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effect of adoption of longterm performance plans on stock prices and accounting numbers. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1992) 27:561–573Crossref, Google Scholar
- An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts. J. Accounting Res. (1987) 25Supplement:85–125Crossref, Google Scholar
- Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:841–864Crossref, Google Scholar
- Managerial pay and corporate performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1970) 60:710–720Google Scholar
- Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. (1987) 9:287–310Crossref, Google Scholar
- Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. (1995) 38:163–184Crossref, Google Scholar
- Management ownership and market valuation—An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:293–315Crossref, Google Scholar
- Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. (1985) 7:11–42Crossref, Google Scholar
- Taking stock: Does equity-based compensation increase managers' ownership? (1997) . Working paper, New York University, New York, JuneGoogle Scholar
- The dependence of pay-performance sensitivity on the size of the firm. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1998) 80(3):436–443Crossref, Google Scholar
- Accounting earnings and top executive compensation. J. Accounting Econom. (1993) 16:55–100Crossref, Google Scholar
- Managerial bargaining power in the determination of compensation contracts and corporate investment. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1999) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Compensation-based (disincentives) for revenue-maximizing behavior. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1988) 70:154–158Crossref, Google Scholar

