Knowledge Reuse for Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0116

References

  • Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):105–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Amabile T. M.Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview, CO, Boulder) Google Scholar
  • Appleyard M. M. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:137–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armbrecht F. M. R., Chapas R. B., Chappelow C. C., F Farris G. Knowledge management in research and development. Res. Tech. Management (2001) 44(4):28–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becerra-Fernandez I., Sabherwal R. Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):23–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackler F. Knowledge knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16(6):1021–1046CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng Y.-T., Van de Ven A. H. Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos? Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(6):593–614LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark H.Using Language (1996) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Chauffeured versus end user access to commercial databases: The effects of task and individual differences. MIS Quart. (1983) 7(1):55–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Jarvenpaa S. L., Beers M. C. Improving knowledge work processes. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(4):53–65Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Noveoka K. Creating and managing a high-performing knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:345–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capabilities as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gray P. H. The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: Towards a research model. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9:175–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:83–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heery R. Review of metadata formats. Program (1996) 30(4):345–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holsapple C. W., Joshi K. D. An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9:235–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly G. A., Bannister D. Behaviour is an experiment. Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory (1970) (Academic Press, New York) 255–269Google Scholar
  • Klein H. K., Myers M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(1):67–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leifer R., McDermott C. M., O'Connor G. C., Peters L. S., Rice M. P., Veryzer R. W., Rice M.Radical Innovation (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Leonard D., Sensiper S. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):112–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):57–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osterloh M., Frey B. S. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):538–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Rogers E. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (1980) 1(4):499–514Google Scholar
  • Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schultze U., Boland R. J. Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9:193–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, “translations,” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1989) 19:387–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swan J. Knowledge management in action: Integrating knowledge across communities. Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2001) Oahu HI.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):9–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. (1981) 458:81–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):743–762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A.The Knowledge Management Toolkit (2002) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ) Google Scholar
  • Unsworth K. Unpacking creativity. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(2):289–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R.Case Study Research (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.