Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134

References

  • Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Allison P. Measures of inequality. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1978) 43:865–880CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992a) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992b) 3(3):321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):v–viiiLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J., Moreland R. Knowledge transfer in organizations. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J., Utterback J. Uncertainty and technical communication patterns. Management Sci. (1985) 31(3):301–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J., Sutcliffe K. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):875–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns L. Matrix management in hospitals: Testing theories of matrix structure and development. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:349–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S., Bailey D. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conrath D. Communication environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Sci. (1973) 20:586–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J., Cross R. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks (2003) 25(3):197–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S., Lawrence P.Matrix (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Monge P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):693–703LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K., Tabrizi B. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ford R., Randolph W. Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. J. Management (1992) 18(2):267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations (1994) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):360–373LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman R., Lorsch J. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K., Northcraft G., Neale M. Why differences make a difference. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D., LaVoie L. Separating individual and group effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:339–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler S., Cummings J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Maznevski M., Chudoba C. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J.Groups (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Monge P., Rothman L., Eisenberg E., Miller K., Kirste K. The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Sci. (1985) 31(9):1129–1141LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C., Caldwell D., Barnett W. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:21–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled L., Eisenhardt K., Xin K. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinto M., Pinto J., Prescott J. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. (1993) 39(10):1281–1297LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rulke D., Galaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):612–625LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teachman J. Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods Res. (1980) 5(3):341–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. Impacts of perceived environmental variability on patterns of work related communication. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22(1):482–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Moenaert R. The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):S1–S18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williams K., O'Reilly C. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behavior (1998) 20:77–140Google Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.