Multistage Monte Carlo Method for Solving Influence Diagrams Using Local Computation

References

• Bielza C., Müller P., Rios Insua D. Decision analysis by augmented probability simulation. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):995–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Black F., Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81:637–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M., Glasserman P. Pricing American-style securities using simulation. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1997) 21:1323–1352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geske R., Johnson H. E. The American put option valued analytically. J. Finance (1984) 39(5):1511–1524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilks W. R., Richardson S., Spiegelhalter D. B.Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (1996) (CRC Press, London, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P.Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (2003) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsman D., Nelson B. L. Comparing systems via simulation. Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice (1998) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertz D. B. Risk analysis in capital investment. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1964) 42(1):95–106Reprinted in Harvard Bus. Rev. 1979 57(5) 169–181Google Scholar
• Howard R. A. Proximal decision analysis. Management Sci. (1971) 19(9):507–541Link, Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1984) 2(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA) 719–762Google Scholar
• Jenzarli A. Modeling dependence in project management. (1995) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas Business School, Lawrence, KSGoogle Scholar
• Keefer D. L. Certainty equivalents for three-point discrete-distribution approximations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(6):760–773Link, Google Scholar
• Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller A. C., Rice T. R. Discrete approximations of probability distributions. Management Sci. (1983) 29:352–362Link, Google Scholar
• Niederreiter H. Random number generation and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. SIAM (1992) (CBMS-NSF, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Nielsen T. D., Jensen F. V., Laskey K. B., Prade H. Well-defined decision scenarios. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proc. Fifteenth Conf. (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) 502–511Google Scholar
• Olmsted S. M. On representing and solving decision problems. (1983) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Ortiz L. E., Kaelbling L. P. Sampling methods for action selection in influence diagrams. Proc. Seventeenth National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2000) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) . (AAAI-2000)Google Scholar
• Poland III W. B. Decision analysis with continuous and discrete variables: A mixture distribution approach. (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Raiffa H.Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty (1968) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1986) 34(6):871–882Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D., Kenley C. R. Gaussian influence diagrams. Management Sci. (1989) 35(5):527–550Link, Google Scholar
• Shachter R. D., Peot M. A., Henrion M., Shachter R. D., Kanal L. N., Lemmer J. F. Simulation approaches to general probabilistic inference on belief networks. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1990) 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)221–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenoy P. P. Valuation-based systems for Bayesian decision analysis. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(3):463–484Link, Google Scholar
• Shenoy P. P. Game trees for decision analysis. Theory Decision (1998) 44:149–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. E. Moment methods for decision analysis. Management Sci. (1993) 39(3):340–358Link, Google Scholar
• Smith J. E., Holtzman S., Matheson J. E. Structuring conditional relationships in influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(2):280–297Link, Google Scholar
• Tatman J. A., Shachter R. D. Dynamic programming and influence diagrams. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1990) 20(2):365–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic behavior (1944) 1st ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar