Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems

References

• Ahuja R. K., Ergun O., Orlin J. B., Punnen A. P. A survey of very large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl. Math. (2002) 123(1–3):75–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander C.Notes on the Synthesis of Form (1964) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam Y.Dynamics of Complex Systems (1997) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Chapman W. L., Rozenblit J., Bahill A. T. System design is an NP-complete problem. Systems Engrg. (2001) 4:222–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R., Kaplan R. S. Activity-based systems: Measuring the costs of resource usage. Accounting Horizons (1992) 6(3):1–13Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy (2001) 30:1019–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg D. E.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1989) (Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Hamilton D. P. Intel gambles it can move beyond the PC with new microprocessor. The Wall Street Journal (2001) May 29):1Google Scholar
• Holland J. H.Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence (1992) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A.At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Langlois R. Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2002) 49:19–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678Link, Google Scholar
• Macduffie J. P. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1995) 48(2):197–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Marengo L., Dosi G., Legrenzi P., Pasquali C. The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9(4):757–788Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markoff J., Lohr S. Intel's huge bet turns iffy. New York Times (2002) September 29):3Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Parnas D. L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM (1972) 15(12):1053–1058Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R. The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica (1993) 61(5):1109–1146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayward-Smith V. J., Osman I. H., Reeves C. R., Smith G. D.Modern Heuristic Search Methods (1996) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Rivkin J., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–321Link, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaefer S. Product design partitions with complementary components. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1999) 38(3):311–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M., Steensma K. H. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1982) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. T., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (1999) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Vincenti W. G.What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (1990) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Wilson E., Bossert W.A Primer of Population Biology (1971) (Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA) Google Scholar