Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186

References

  • Bierma T. J., Waterstraat F. L.Chemical Management: Reducing Waste and Cost Through Innovative Supply Strategies (2000) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bulow J. L. Durable-goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90:314–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bylinsky G. Manufacturing for reuse. Fortune (1995) 131:102–103Google Scholar
  • Corbett C., DeCroix G. Shared savings contracts in supply chains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(7):881–893LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C., De Groote X. A supplier's optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Sci. (2000) 46:444–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:110–129LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. Sales force compensation: A review of MS/OR advances. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1993) 5(Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland) Google Scholar
  • Debo L., Toktay B., Van Wassenhove L. N. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. (2002) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Discount Store News Discounters snap up lion's share of single-use camera sales. Discount Store News (1994) 33:31–32Google Scholar
  • Donohue K. Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1397–1411LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emmons H., Gilbert S. The role of return policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catelogue goods. Management Sci. (1998) 44:276–283LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fine C., Porteus E. Dynamic process improvement. Oper. Res. (1989) 37:580–591LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J. M., Dekker R., van der Laan E., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Van Wassenhove L. N. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103:1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fruchter G. E., Kalish S. Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Sci. (1997) 43:54–63LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert S. M., Cvsa V. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150(3):617CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsburg J. Once is not enough. BusinessWeek (2001) April 16Google Scholar
  • Guide D., Van Wassenhove L. N. Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):142–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide D., Srivastava R., Krause M. Product scheduling complexity and scheduling of operations in recoverable manufacturing. Internat. J. Production Res. (1997) 35(11):3179–3199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide D., Jayraman V., Srivastava R., Benton W. C. Supply chain management for recoverable manufacturing systems. Interfaces (2000) 30(3):125–142LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., Loulou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):301–316LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hickey K. Here and there. Traffic World Magazine (2001) 265(40):21Google Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:324–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A., Shugan S. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:239–271LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krikke H. Recovery strategies and reverse logistics network design. (1998) . Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Twente, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J. J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lee E., Staelin R. Vertical strategic interaction: Implications for channel pricing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:185–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Kotler P., Moorthy K. S.Marketing Models (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCartney W. Product takeback coming to a store near you. IEEE Spectrum (1999) 36:106–107Google Scholar
  • McGuire T., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:161–192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Manufacturer's return policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:81–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:166–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petruzzi N. C., Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. (1999) 47:183–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porteus E. Optimal lot sizing process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Oper. Res. (1986) 137–144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reiskin E. D., White A. L., Johnson J. K., Votta T. J. Servicizing the chemical supply chain. J. Indust. Ecology (2000) 3:19–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savaskan R. C., Van Wassenhove L. N. Strategic decentralization of reverse channels and price discrimination through buy-back payments. (2001) . Working paper #1329, Math Center, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Savaskan R. C., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Channel choice and coordination in a remanufacturing environment. (1999) . Working paper #99/14/TM, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Stern L. W., El-Ansary A. I., Coughlan A. T.Marketing Channels (1996) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Swan P. L. Optimal durability second hand markets, and planned obsolescence. J. Political Econom. (1972) 80:575–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M.Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • van der Laan E. The effects of remanufacturing on inventory control. (1997) . Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University, School of Management, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Weng Z. K. Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1509–1522LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitin T. M. Inventory control and price theory. Management Sci. (1955) 2:61–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xerox CorporationXerox Environmental Report (2001) (Xerox Corporation)Google Scholar
  • Zabel E. Monopoly and uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1970) 37:205–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Z. Raising awareness and signaling quality to uninformed consumers: A price-advertising model. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19:390–396LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.