Converting Technology to Mitigate Environmental Damage

References

• Angell L. C., Klassen R. D. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: An agenda for research in operations management. J. Oper. Management (1999) 17:575–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J., Oates W. E.The Theory of Environmental Policy (1988) 2nd ed.(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bovenberg A. L., Goulder L. H. Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General equilibrium analyses. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(4):985–1000Google Scholar
• Boyer M., Laffont J. Towards a political theory of the emergence of environmental incentive regulation. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 30(1):137–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brock W. A., Evans D. S. The economics of regulatory tiering. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(2):398–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrows P. Pigovian taxes, polluter subsidies, regulation, and the size of a polluting industry. Canadian J. Econom. (1979) 12(3):494–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortazar G., Schwartz E. S., Salinas M. Evaluating environmental investments: A real options approach. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1059–1070Link, Google Scholar
• Crandall R. W. Controlling industrial pollution: The economics and politics of clean air. The Regulation of Economic Activity (1983) (Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Cropper M. L., Oates W. E. Environmental economics: A survey. J. Econom. Lit. (1992) 30(2):675–740Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Goulder L. H., Parry I. W. H., Williams R. C., D Burtraw. The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. J. Public Econom. (1999) 72(3):329–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray W., Shadbegian R. Environmental regulation affects technology choice. (1998) . Working paper 6036, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Hahn R. W. The impact of economics on environmental policy. J. Environ. Econom. Management (2000) 39:375–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klassen R. D., Mclaughlin C. P. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1199–1214Link, Google Scholar
• Kwerel E. To tell the truth: Imperfect information and optimal pollution control. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44:595–601Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis T. R. Protecting the environment when costs and benefits are privately known. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(4):819–847Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirrlees J. A. The theory of optimal taxation. Handbook of Mathematical Economics (1986) 3(Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1197–1249Google Scholar
• Nault B. R. Equivalence of taxes and subsidies in the control of production externalities. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):307–320Link, Google Scholar
• Palmer K., Walls M. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal—taxes, subsidies, and standards. J. Public Econom. (1997) 65(2):193–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polinsky M. A. Notes on the symmetry of taxes and subsidies in pollution control. Canadian J. Econom. (1979) 12(1):75–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russel C. S., Harrington W., Vaughan W. J.Enforcing Pollution Control Laws (1986) (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Schmutzler A., Goulder L. H. The choice between emission taxes and output taxes under imperfect monitoring. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1997) 32:51–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segerson K. Uncertainty and incentives for non-point pollution control. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1988) 16:87–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spulber D. F.Regulation and Markets (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Swierzbinski J. Guilty until proven innocent—Regulation with costly and limited enforcement. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1994) 25:127–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Weitzman M. L. Optimal rewards for economic regulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1978) 68(4):683–691Google Scholar