Resource Allocation Based on Efficiency Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0244

References

  • Athanassopoulos A. D. Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: Allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 87(3):535–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athanassopoulos A. D. Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(2):173–187LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1984) 30(9):1078–1092LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belton V., Goicoechea A., Duckstein L., Zionts S. Integrating data envelopment analysis with multiple criteria decision analysis. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (1992) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 71–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouyssou D. Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: Some remarks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1999) 50(9):974–978CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2(6):429–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Short communication: Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1979) 3(4):339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Chai D., Doyle J., Green R. Hierarchies and groups in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. (1998) 10(2):177–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Färe R., Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. (2000) 34(1):35–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 39(8):725–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B., Tamir E. Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs: A data envelopment analysis approach. Management Sci. (1995) 41(7):1172–1184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B., Phillips F. Y., Rousseau J. J. Models for improved efficiencies based on DEA efficiency results. IIE Trans. (1993) 25(6):2–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joro T., Korhonen P., Wallenius J. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):962–970LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Laakso J. A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1986) 24(2):277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Wallenius J. A Pareto Race. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35:615–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory Computation, and Application (1986) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stewart T. J. Relationships between DEA and MCDM. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996) 47(5):654–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thanassoulis E., Dyson R. G. Estimating preferred target input-output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 56(1):80–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A., Fandel G., Gal T. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Multiple Objective Decision Making, Theory and Application (1980) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 468–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A. On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum (1986) 8:73–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.