Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0251

References

  • Adiri I., Yechiali U. Optimal priority purchasing and pricing decisions in nonmonopoly and monopoly queues. Oper. Res. (1974) 22:1051–1066LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Altman E., Shimkin N. Individual equilibrium and learning in processor sharing systems. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:776–784LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armony M., Maglaras C. On customer contact centers with a callback option: Customer decision, sequencing rules, and system design. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(2):271–292LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckmann M., McGuire C. B., Winsten C. B.Studies in the Economics of Transportation (1956) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Bell C. E., Stidham S. Individual versus social optimization in the allocation of customers to alternative servers. Management Sci. (1983) 29:831–839LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Braess D. Über ein paradoxon der verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung (1968) 12:258–268Google Scholar
  • Cohen J. E., Kelly F. P. A paradox of congestion in a queuing network. J. Appl. Probab. (1990) 27:730–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai J. G. On positive Harris recurrence of multiclass queueing networks: A unified approach via fluid limit models. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1995) 5:49–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai J. G., Prabhakar B. The throughput of data switches with and without speedup. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 (2000) 2:556–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubey P. Inefficiency of Nash equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11(1):1–8LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Harrison J. M., Fleming W., Lions P. L. Brownian models of queueing networks with heterogeneous customer populations. Stochastic Differential Systems, Stochastic Control Theory and Applications (1988) (Springer, New York) 147–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison J. M., Van Mieghem J. A. Dynamic control of Brownian networks: State-space collapse and equivalent workload formulations. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1997) 7:747–771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F. P. Network routing. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A (1991) 337:343–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E., Papadimitriou C. Worst-case equilibria. 1563Proc. 16th Annual Sympos. Theoret. Aspects Comput. Sci. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(Springer, Berlin, Germany) 404–413Google Scholar
  • Kumar S., Kumar P. R. Performance bounds for queueing networks and scheduling policies. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1994) 39(8):1600–1611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar P. R., Seidman T. I. Dynamic instabilities and stabilization methods in distributed real-time scheduling of manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1990) 35:289–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La R. J., Anantharam V. Optimal routing control: A repeated game approach. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (2002) 47(3):437–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu C. H., Kumar P. R. Distributed scheduling based on due dates and buffer priorities. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1991) 36(12):1406–1416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maglaras C. Dynamic control of stochastic processing networks: A fluid model approach. (1998) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Maglaras C., Zeevi A. Pricing and capacity sizing for systems with shared resources: Approximate solutions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(8):1018–1038LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maglaras C., Zeevi A. Pricing and design of differentiated services: Approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res. (2005) . Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. (1990) 38:870–883LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naor P. The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37:15–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panwalker S. S., Iskander W. A survey of scheduling rules. Oper. Res. (1977) 25(1):45–61LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Papadimitriou C. H., Tsitsiklis J. N. The complexity of optimal queueing network control. Math. Oper. Res. (1996) 24(2):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pinilla J. M., Prinz F. B. Lead time reduction through flexible routing: Application to shape deposition manufacturing. Internat. J. Production Res. (2003) 41(13):2957–2973CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridemax.com. 2004. www.ridemax.comGoogle Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos E. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (2002) 49(2):236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rybko A. N., Stolyar A. L. Ergodicity of stochastic processes describing the operations of open queueing networks. Problems Inform. Transmission (1992) 28:199–220Google Scholar
  • Sharifnia A. Instability of the join-the-shortest-queue and FCFS policies in queuing systems and their stabilization. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(2):309–314LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. V. Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of Gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. (2000) 46(9):1249–1267LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitt W. Deciding which queue to join: Some counterexamples. Oper. Res. (1986) 34(1):55–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitt W. How multiserver queues scale with growing congestion dependent demand. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(4):531–542LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.