Bertrand Supertraps

References

• Anderson E. Sharing the wealth: When should firms treat customers as partners? Management Sci. (2002) 48:955–971Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson Simon P., Leruth Luc. Why firms may prefer not to price discriminate via mixed bundling. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1993) 11:49–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson Simon P., de Palma Anderé, Kreider Brent. Tax incidence in differentiated product oligopoly. J. Public Econom. (2001) 81:173–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M., Vickers J. Competitive price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 32:579–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausubel Lawrence M., Deneckere Raymond J. One is almost enough for monopoly. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18:255–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Yannis, Brynjolfsson Erik. Bundling and competition on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19:63–82Link, Google Scholar
• Beggs A., Klemperer P. Multiperiod competition with switching costs. Econometrica (1989) 60:651–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkard Lanier C. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:1034–1054Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluestone Barry, Jordan Peter, Sullivan Mark. Aircraft Industry Dynamics (1981) (Auburn House, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Borenstein S. Price discrimination in free-entry markets. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16:380–397Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J. Durable goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90:314–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J., Geanakoplos J., Klemperer P. Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:488–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L., Riordan M. The learning curve, market dominance and predatory pricing. Econometrica (1994) 62:1115–1140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L., Villas-Boas M. Multiproduct oligopoly and Bertrand supertraps. (2001) . Working paper, New York University, New York, and University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Caminal R., Vives X. Why market shares matter: An information-based theory. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27:221–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Champsaur P., Rochet J.-C. Multiproduct duopolists. Econometrica (1989) 57:533–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church Jeffrey, Gandal Neil. Integration, complementary products, and variety. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1992) 1:651–675Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church Jeffrey, Gandal Neil. Systems competition, vertical merger, and foreclosure. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2000) 9:25–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts K. Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All-out competition and strategic commitment. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29:306–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai Preyas S., Purohit Devavrat. Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18:42–58Link, Google Scholar
• Driskill Robert. Durable goods oligopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2001) 19:391–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides Nicholas. Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:1165–1181Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:940–955Google Scholar
• Farrell Joseph, Monroe Hunter K., Saloner Garth. Vertical organization of industry: Systems competition versus component competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1998) 7:143–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Learning by doing and market performance. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14:522–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. The fat cat effect, the puppy dog ploy and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (1984) 74:361–368Google Scholar
• Hermalin B.Notes on Microeconomics (1993) (Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Soberman D. Markets for product modification information. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19:203–225Link, Google Scholar
• Katz M. Firm-specific differentiation and competition among multiproduct firms. J. Bus. (1984) 57:149–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94:822–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim B.-D., Shi M., Srinivasan K. Reward programs and tacit collusion. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20:99–120Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D. Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:490–499Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Tirole J.Markov Perfect Equilibrium, I: Observable Actions. (1997) (Harvard University, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Matutes Carmen, Regibeau Pierre. “Mix and match”: Product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:221–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58:1255–1278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S. Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7:335–355Link, Google Scholar
• Nalebuff B. Competing against bundles. (2000) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Newhouse John. The Sporty Game. (1988) (Alfred Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
• Panzar J., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Technological determinants of firm and industry structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1991) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)Google Scholar
• Prahalad C., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68:79–91Google Scholar
• Seade Jesus. Profitable cost increases and the shifting of taxation: Equilibrium responses of markets in oligopoly. (1987) . Working paper, University of Warwick, Warwick, UKGoogle Scholar
• Stokey N. Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12:112–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L. Nonlinear pricing and oligopoly. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4:529–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss S. Marketing strategies for products with cross-market network externalities. (1999) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Comparative statics of fixed points. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 73:183–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Consumer learning, brand loyalty, and competition. Marketing Sci. (2004a) 23:134–145Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M.Dynamic Competition with Experience Goods (2004b) (University of California, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• von Weizsacker C. The costs of substitution. Econometrica (1984) 52:1085–1116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whinston M. Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:837–859Google Scholar