A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena

References

• Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 78(1):53–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2002) 6:107–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P. Attitudes, intentions and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1981) 41(4):607–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(1):74–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Baumgartner H., Yi Y. State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(March):505–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajaj A., Nidumolu S. R. A feedback model to understand information system usage. Inform. Management (1998) 33:213–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberg S., Ajzen I., Schmidt P. Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (2003) 25(3):175–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):439–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty S. E., Kahle L. R. Alternative hierarchies of the attitude-behavior relationship: The impact of brand commitment and habit. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(Summer):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck L., Ajzen I. Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J. Res. Personality (1991) 25:285–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem D. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psych. Rev. (1967) 74(3):183–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem D., Berkowitz L. Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1972) Vol. 6(Academic Press, New York) 1–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem D., McConnell H. K. Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1970) 16:23–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. H., Speckart G. Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1981) 40:226–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(3):351–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A.Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton R. N. A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):45–65Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton R. N., Drew J. H. A longitudinal analysis of the impacts of service changes on customer attitudes. J. Marketing (1991) 55(1):1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boomsma A., Hoogland J. J., Cudeck R., du Toit S., Sörbom D. The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Structural Equation Models: Present and Future. A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Jöreskog (2001) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) 139–168Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Kalra A., Staelin R., Zeithaml V. A. A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(February):7–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extentions. Psychometrika (1987) 52(3):345–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39(November):752–766Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adaptation study. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1996) Cleveland, OH:21–41Google Scholar
• Conner M., Armitage C. J. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1998) 28(15):1429–1464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crampton S. M., Wagner J. A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):67–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (1996) 45(1):19–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Fazio R. H., Zanna M. P. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1990) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 75–109Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(February):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foxall G. R., Goldsmith R. E.Consumer Psychology for Marketing (1994) (Routledge, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Gefen D., Straub D., Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2000) 7(August):1–78Google Scholar
• Goodhue D., Loiacono E. Randomizing survey question order vs. grouping questions by construct: An empirical test of the impact on apparent reliabilities and links to related constructs. Proc. 35th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2002) Big Island, HI:254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24(1):1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling (1999) 6(1):1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., Davis G. B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 11(4):87–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D. R. Panel analysis in family studies. J. Marriage Family (1988) 50(4):949–955Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K., Sörbom D.PRELIS2: User’s Reference Guide (1996a) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K., Sörbom D.LISREL8: User’s Reference Guide (1996b) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K., Sörbom D.LISREL8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1998) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K., Sörbom D., du Toit S., du Toit M.LISREL8: New Statistical Features (1999) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Karahanna E., Straub D., Chervany N. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):183–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline R. B.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998) (The Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• LaBarbera P., Mazursky D. A longitudinal assessment of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction: The dynamic aspect of the cognitive process. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(November):393–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemon K. N., White T. B., Winer R. S. Dynamic customer relationship management: Incorporating future considerations into the service retention decision. J. Marketing (2002) 66(January):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M., Hirt S. G. Force of habit and information systems usage: Theory and initial validation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 4:65–97Google Scholar
• MacCallum R. C., Browne M. W., Sugawara H. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psych. Methods (1996) 1(2):130–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R. P., Ho M. R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psych. Methods (2002) 7(1):64–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melone N. P. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sci. (1990) 36(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Mittal V., Kumar P., Tsiros M. Attribute-level performance, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions over time: A consumption system approach. J. Marketing (1999) 63(2):88–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver R. L. Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. J. Retailing (1981) 57(3):25–48Google Scholar
• Oliver R. L., Bearden W. O. Crossover effects in the theory of reasoned action: A moderating influence attempt. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 12(December):324–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouellette J. A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psych. Bull. (1998) 124(1):54–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical view of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronis D. L., Yates J. F., Kirscht J. P., Pratkanis A. R., Breckler S. J., Greenwald A. G. Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. Attitude Structure and Function (1989) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 213–239Google Scholar
• Schmittlein D. C., Cooper L. G., Morrison D. G. Truth in concentration in the land of (80/20) laws. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):167–183Link, Google Scholar
• Sheppard B. H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P. R. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(December):325–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J. E. M., Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(June):78–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J. E. M., van Trijp H. C. M. The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1991) 8:283–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342Link, Google Scholar
• Straub D., Marie-Claude B., Gefen D. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 13:380–427Google Scholar
• Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):85–92Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176Link, Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C.Interpersonal Behavior (1977) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Brown S. A. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):71–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27(3):451–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):115–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Ackerman P. L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(1):33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis F. D., Davis G. B. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises—the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):942–962Link, Google Scholar
• Verplanken B., Aarts H., van Knippenberg A. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1997) 27:539–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verplanken B., Aarts H., van Knippenberg A., Moonen A. Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British J. Soc. Psych. (1998) 37:111–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verplanken B., Aarts H., van Knippenberg A., van Knippenberg C. Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1994) 24(4):285–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woszczynski A. B., Whitman M. E., Whitman M. E., Woszczynski A. B. The problem of common method variance in IS research. The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 66–77Crossref, Google Scholar