Trust Building Among Strangers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0350

References

  • Alchian Armen, Demsetz Harold. The property rights paradigm. J. Econom. History (1973) 33:16–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Berg Joyce, Dickhaut John, McCabe Kevin. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10:122–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J., Eccles R. Price, authority, trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Ann. Rev. Sociology (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer Colin. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Camerer Colin, Ho Teck-Hua. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer Colin, Hogarth Robin. The effects of financial incentives in economic experiments: A review and capital-labor production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19:7–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer Colin, Weigelt Keith. Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica (1988) 56(1):1–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho Teck-Hua, Chong Juin-Kuan. Sophisticated learning and strategic teaching. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104:137–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T-H., Chong J-K. A cognitive hierarchy model of one-shot games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiles T. H., McMackin J. F. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:73–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Craswell Richard. On the uses of “trust”: Comment on Williamson, “Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization.”. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36:487–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed W. E. D., Miles R. E., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 16–38Google Scholar
  • Forsythe Robert, Horowitz Joel, Savin N. Z., Sefton Martin. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econom. Behavior (1994) 6:347–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman D. Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica (1991) 58:637–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fukuyama F.Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (1995) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Glaeser Edward, Laibson David, Scheinkman Jose, Soutter Christine. Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):811–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociology (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene Graham. The Ministry of Fear (1943) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gurtman M. B. Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62:989–1002CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayashi Nahoko, Yamagishi Toshio. Selective play: Choosing partners in an uncertain world. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (1998) 2(4):276–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckathorn Douglas. Collective sanctions and the emergence of prisoner’s dilemma norms. Amer. Sociology Rev. (1988) 55:366–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertwig Ralph, Ortmann Andreas. Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists. Behavioral Brain Sci. (2001) 24:383–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho Teck-Hua, Weigelt Keith. Task complexity, equilibrium selection, and learning: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1996) 42:659–679LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ho Teck-Hua, Keith Weigelt. Trust building among strangers. (2004) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman Elizabeth, McCabe Kevin, Smith Vernon. Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):653–660Google Scholar
  • Hoffman Elizabeth, McCabe Kevin, Smith Vernon. Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Econom. Inquiry (1998) 36(3):335–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman Elizabeth, McCabe Kevin, Shachat Keith, Smith Vernon. Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econom. Behavior (1994) 7:346–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins Douglas, Mitra Atul, Gupta Nina, Shaw Jason. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83:777–787CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman Daniel, Knetsch Jack L., Thaler Richard. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(6):1325–1348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiyonari Tohko, Yamagishi T. A new game of trust: Letting the partner be the dictator. 7th Internat. Conf. Soc. Dilemmas (1997) Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  • Kiyonari Tohko, Tanida Shigehito, Yamagishi Toshio. Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic? Evolution Human Behavior (2000) 21(6):411–427CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kollock P. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociology (1994) 100:313–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra Deepak, Keith Murnighan J. Self versus social impression management in dictatorship games. (2000) . Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:24–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCabe K., Smith V., LePore M. Intentionality detection and “mindreading”: Why does game form matter? Proc. National Acad. Sci. United States of America (2000) 97(National Academies of Science Press, Washington, D.C.) 4404–4409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey R., Palfrey T. An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica (1992) 60:803–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orbell John, Dawes Robyn. A “cognitive miser” theory of cooperators’ advantage. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1991) 85:515–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orbell John, Dawes Robyn. Social welfare, cooperators’ advantage, and the option of not playing the game. Amer. Sociology Rev. (1993) 58:787–800CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:483–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. Games of perfect information, predatory pricing, and the chain-store paradox. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 25:92–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro S. P. The social control of impersonal trust. Amer. J. Sociology (1987) 93:623–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith Vernon, Walker James M. Rewards, experience, and decision costs in first price auctions. Econom. Inquiry (1993) 31:237–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright Robert. The Moral Animal. (1995) (Vintage Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation Emotion (1994) 18:9–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Cook K. A., Watabe W. M. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. Amer. J. Sociology (1998) 104:165–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavioral (1986) 8(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 53–111Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.