Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0354

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000a) 45(3):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. (2000b) 21(3):317–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja M. K., Galletta D. F., Carley K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):21–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Albert M. B., Avery D., Narin F., Mcallister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy (1991) 20(3):251–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J., Cohen S. I. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14(1):12–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J., Tushman M. L., Lee D. M. S. Technology-transfer as a function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical-services. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22(4):694–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide (1995) (SAS Institute, Cary,NC) Google Scholar
  • Almeida P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:155–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Silverman B. S. R&D, organization structure and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. (2003) 25(8/9):929–958Google Scholar
  • Arthur W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99:116–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis R. A., Hitt M. A. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociology (1987) 92:1170–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. UCINET VI. (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Columbia, MD) Google Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Burkhardt M. E. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):441–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociology (1987) 92(6):1287–1335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):339–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociology (2004) 110(2):349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H. W., Teece D. J. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(1):65–74Google Scholar
  • Coleman J., Katz E., Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry (1957) 20(4):253–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1972) B34:187–220Google Scholar
  • Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy (1982) 11(3):147–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grabowski H. G., Vernon J. M. Brand loyalty, entry and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 Drug Act. J. Law Econom. (1992) 35:331–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. The future of organizational sociology: Forging ties between paradigms. Contemp. Sociology (2000) 29:476–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J., Borjas G. J. Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous-time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica (1980) 47(187):247–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm research and development. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1720–1747LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Cockburn I. Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):471–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalbfleisch J. D., Prentice R. L.The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data (1980) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Katila R. New product search overtime: Past ideas in their prime? Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):995–1010CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:424–440Google Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(1):81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32:129–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. (1995) 38:463–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 3:783–831CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebeskind J. P., Oliver A. L., Zucker L., Brewer M. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):428–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Sci. (1986) 32(2):173–181LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P., Campbell K. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces (1984) 63(2):483–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):121–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159:56–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narin F., Noma E., Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy (1987) 16(2–4):143–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:61–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nerkar A. Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Sci. (2003) 49(2):211–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver A. L., Liebeskind J. P. Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: Implications for studying interorganizational networks. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. (1998) 27:76–103Google Scholar
  • Patel P., Pavitt K. The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy (1997) 26(2):141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociology (1993) 98(4):829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociology (2001) 107(1):33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociology (1995) 100(5):1224–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E., Hannan M. T. Networks, knowledge and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociology (1996) 102(3):659–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Doubleday, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
  • Rappa M. A., Garud R. Modeling contribution spans of scientists in a field: The case of cochlear implants. R&D Management (1992) 22(4):337–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Aydin C. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):219–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):887–910CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R. Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):345–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk C. R. Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):111–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott Morton F. M. Barriers to entry, brand advertising and generic entry in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2000) 18:1085–1104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selznick P.Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (1957) (Row Peterson, Evanston, IL) Google Scholar
  • Silverman B. S. Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1109–1124LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational Learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:125–134LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A., Strahan A., Cadell T., Davies W.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1799) (London, UK)Google Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociology (2001) 106(6):1546–1588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1982) 3(1):39–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tichy N. M., Tushman M. L., Fombrun C. Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1979) 4:507–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tong X. S., Frame J. D. Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Res. Policy (1994) 23(2):133–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. P. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. P., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Special boundary roles in innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(4):587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision-making: A sociometric analysis. Management Sci. (1983) 29(1):12–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Scanlan T. J. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24(1):83–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D., Diamond P., Rothschild M. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Uncertainty in Economics: Readings and Exercises (1989) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 19–34Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking capital. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1999) 64:481–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G. Network position and cognition in a computer software firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(1):103–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C. Management conflict and sociometric structure. Amer. J. Sociology (1961) 67(2):185–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B. Intellectual capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. (1996) . Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.